DotCommunist
So many particulars. So many questions.
you'd think of all publications, the Mail would be the one to get that correct
yes. when was germany defeated in the second war?What's wrong with it - am I missing something obvious?
when did they stop fighting, bi0boy? and where were they fighting in 1935?The Wehrmacht was officially dissolved in 1946, so that's probably where that came from. A bit like the first world war ending in 1919 on war memorials.
The Wehrmacht was officially dissolved in 1946, so that's probably where that came from. A bit like the first world war ending in 1919 on war memorials.
when did they stop fighting, bi0boy? and where were they fighting in 1935?
Dacre gets to publish his petulant rant in his own shitrag. What a strange universe he inhabits.
That's some cuntzpah!
Dacre gets to publish his petulant rant in his own shitrag. What a strange universe he inhabits.
sounds like the cunt Dacre is pretty rattled. Good. Someone should show him that cartoon every time his loathsome rag publishes yet another button-pushing act of incitement.
when did they stop fighting, bi0boy? and where were they fighting in 1935?
and 1947...Tbf Am sure that the Mail was no doubt still supporting Hitler in 1946..
View attachment 109901 The Daily Mail is that shit it didn't recognise Field Marshall Erwin Rommel sharing his canteen with a soldier whilst in command of the Afrika Korps.
I would have thought one of the propaganda staff editors would have recognised one of their great heroes.
You need to take into account that for the wankers a the Mail, it's a given that Generals etc lead from the rear, so seeing a picture of an officer mixing with an enlisted man would have provoked the assumption that it couldn't possibly be the Field Marshall, just some look-a-like junior.
Not an enlisted soldier however. Check his epaulettes, field glasses and map case.
The Guardian knows this, because the Mail has told it countless times,...
This from the paper who wrote "Hurrah for the Blackshirts".