Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

why the daily mail's going down the drain

What? Crowbarring the undefined term "woke" into today's front page. For some context, that's £1m out of a total NHS annual budget of £174b.

1661029110293.png

The Mail has a similar group for its own staff, for those who feel left out because they haven't yet been called a cunt by Dacre.
 
For whatever random reason, looked at their website this morning. An article states that Russia continues to 'tease' us with nuclear war. I've never heard it referred to quite like that before. Comments seem very pro Putin on the whole. One, someone very angry in Worthing, calls Zelensky a 'cycle path'.
 
Last edited:
Yes, I chuckle for a good while when I saw that this morning, as I'm sure did Paul "vagina monologues" Dacre.
Too many examples, but this one's good:

Swear it again
Good cunt, bad cunt


If Paul Dacre does end up getting the job at Ofcom, you can be sure that one of his first orders of business will be downgrading the C-word from 'Most Offensive' to 'Punctuation'.

Dacre's potty mouth is legendary on Fleet Street, but there's a particularly good anecdote about it in the Mail Men biography which sees Dacre picking up the phone to talk to one of his journalists, Jimmy Grylls, but actually ending up on the line with Tory MP Michael Grylls.

Immediately, Dacre launches into one of his famous tirades, barking orders liberally peppered with Fs and Cs – until a colleague, horrified, points out that he isn't speaking to one of his lackeys, but a member of Parliament.

Dacre realises an apology will be in order. So, barely missing a beat, the next words out of his mouth? "Oh, I'm a cunt! I really am a fucking cunt! What a stupid fucking cunt I am!"

Popbitch 4/11/21
 
Last edited:
Last week they reverted to implying that Ed Miliband is a communist, just as they did 2010-15, because, well, isn't it obvious?

1668624450936.png
 
This will hopefully be fun


Among the allegations against Associated Newspaper made by lawyers acting for the claimants were:

  • the hiring of private investigators to secretly place listening devices inside people’s cars and homes;
  • the commissioning of individuals to surreptitiously listen in to, and record, people’s live, private telephone calls while they were taking place;
  • the payment of police officials, with allegedly corrupt links to private investigators, for sensitive inside information;
  • the impersonation of individuals to obtain medical information from private hospitals, clinics, and treatment centres by deception;
  • the accessing of bank accounts, credit histories and financial transactions through illicit means and manipulation.
strangely though

... two months later, the paperwork setting out the allegations against the Daily Mail and its sister titles is still not public. Sources with knowledge of the case said this followed a legal intervention by Associated Newspapers which has delayed formal acknowledgment – and therefore publication – of the claims.

This is despite the Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday’s long record of campaigning against “secret justice” and for transparency in the court system. Spokespeople for the Daily Mail’s parent company did not respond to multiple requests for comment asking why the company had yet to acknowledge the claims.
 
Doreen Lawrence is an interesting one, as the DM likes to style itself, not inaccurately, as the champion of the campaign for justice for her son. I'm not an avid enough reader of this particular journal to know if she's previously done them wrong.
 
quite amusing that Prince Harry and a load of slebs turned up to court today. made much more of the case by doing so. particularly on a day when it sounded like a fairly dull day of legal argument which wouldn't have made the news if they hadn't attended.
 
Suddenly the Lords are bad because they are unelected. I salute this epiphany by the Mail, and look forward to their calling for the Monarchy to be abolished forthwith :thumbs:

View attachment 371522

Di74TC3XgAEziOZ.jpg
 
I wish they would make their mind up. I’m sure I remember the very same newspaper denouncing a mere three years ago dozens of democratically elected MPs as ‘enemies of the people’ for daring to vote for a measure contrary to its views. But surely I’m remembering it wrong.
 
Back
Top Bottom