Why Labour are Scum
- Thread starter redsquirrel
- Start date
DotCommunist
So many particulars. So many questions.
what a bunch of fucking cunts. You had one job Labour, one fucking job and you shit it again
stethoscope
Well-Known Member
danny la rouge
More like *fanny* la rouge!
Denis Skinner agrees with Tommy Sheppard's arithmetic:
spartacus mills
let's wee on each other
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-33608826
Timms accuses the 'rebels' of undermining the party. FFS, its the weasels who sat idly by that undermined the Labour Party in the eyes of their traditional voters.
Timms accuses the 'rebels' of undermining the party. FFS, its the weasels who sat idly by that undermined the Labour Party in the eyes of their traditional voters.
stethoscope
Well-Known Member
Blunkett was going down that route this morning on Radio 4 too 
DotCommunist
So many particulars. So many questions.
and in 2017 when they stand shoulder to shoulder with the vermin to browbeat and hector us all with dire warnings of becoming a third worl ghetto if we don't vote to stay in the greece-fucking european union...well. Well well well. If they lost scotland then they can lose everything
"Welfare" was always going to be the weakest of the weak spots of Labour given that they've lost two elections being painted as a party with spending out of control, accounts in a shambles while people on benefits live it up with flat screen tvs while the squeezed middle etc etc.
By giving it all the "undermining the party" instead of acknowledging that it's a difficult issue for the party they're playing into their opponents hands.
I liked what Corbyn said about needing to have a policy debate before a leadership debate, that makes a lot of sense.
By giving it all the "undermining the party" instead of acknowledging that it's a difficult issue for the party they're playing into their opponents hands.
I liked what Corbyn said about needing to have a policy debate before a leadership debate, that makes a lot of sense.
spartacus mills
let's wee on each other
Flip-flop: "Tonight I am firing the starting gun on Labour's opposition to this Bill. If I am elected leader in September, I am determined that Labour will fight this regressive Bill word by word, line by line."
DotCommunist
So many particulars. So many questions.
that cunt might as well have renege written on his sweaty businessmans forehead
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
I'd rather carve it into his forehead, given my druthers.
taffboy gwyrdd
Embrace the confusion!
Too late. The SNP have fired the gun and are leading the fight. Labour need to take their place in the queue behind Libdems, Greens (and DUP?)
J Ed
Follow Back Pro Expropriation
I hate (most) Labour more than the Tories. The lower than vermin pondscum are just doing what comes naturally to subhuman sociopaths but it took the Labour Party to be the midwife for the culture shift that delivered a Tory majority government. Any party not totally dedicated to being the servants of the financial industry and administering austerity could have challenged the narrative that public spending caused the recession and would have had the nous not to join in with the jocks under the beds narrative during and after the Scottish Independence Referendum.
belboid
Exasperated, not angry.
not that surprised by Blomfield, Harpham is more surprising, considering he pretends to be a 'proper leftwinger'
DotCommunist
So many particulars. So many questions.
He is fighting mightily in that parliament where he goes, mightily arguing down this iniquity.
taffboy gwyrdd
Embrace the confusion!
How much flak will Labours appeasing MPs be taking today?
Maybe less than you'd assume.
When you're on £80k plus expenses, feted by lobbyists, availing of dinners and free trips to the opera etc. there's little time for giving a shit what the untermensch think. Secretaries and interns can deal with the mail, answer machine and social media stuff.
Maybe less than you'd assume.
When you're on £80k plus expenses, feted by lobbyists, availing of dinners and free trips to the opera etc. there's little time for giving a shit what the untermensch think. Secretaries and interns can deal with the mail, answer machine and social media stuff.
ddraig
kicking against the pricks...
Jo Stevens? voted against iircCan some helpful person provide a linky so i can see how my MP voted. I really cannot be arsed to trawl through the .gov stuff trying to find it. TIA
teqniq
DisMembered
No Kevin Brennan
ddraig
kicking against the pricks...
shame on him!
on this list http://voxpoliticalonline.com/
on this list http://voxpoliticalonline.com/
nino_savatte
No pasaran!
Or Stephen Timid as I prefer to call him. What a useless lump he is.
teqniq
DisMembered
Right. Thanks for that, what a cunt.
youngian
Well-Known Member
The voters they're trying to impress are not listening to them anyway because the candidates don't look or sound like future PMs. And by pissing off most of the Labour Party two months before they ask for their vote demonstrates their lack of political nouse.
Whether you support Corbyn or not he's given an intelligent articulate explanation to his opposition to this bill making points that even Tory voters in London and Southeast will recognise in regards to housing.
But Harman got the reaction she wanted for this omnishables: "Look at us we can stand up to the head-in-the-clouds lefties who haven't got the balls to take on the scroungers and the deficit". But if you are serious about the alleged deficit problem you show leadership by telling everyone to take a haircut (as the IMF would make you): Pension freezes, VAT increases, corporation tax rises for eg. But the Tories have decided to attack the most vulnerable people who have no power and don't vote in great numbers. That's not tough leadership that's the work of cowards. So what does that make the Labour front bench who haven't got the guts to oppose?
Whether you support Corbyn or not he's given an intelligent articulate explanation to his opposition to this bill making points that even Tory voters in London and Southeast will recognise in regards to housing.
But Harman got the reaction she wanted for this omnishables: "Look at us we can stand up to the head-in-the-clouds lefties who haven't got the balls to take on the scroungers and the deficit". But if you are serious about the alleged deficit problem you show leadership by telling everyone to take a haircut (as the IMF would make you): Pension freezes, VAT increases, corporation tax rises for eg. But the Tories have decided to attack the most vulnerable people who have no power and don't vote in great numbers. That's not tough leadership that's the work of cowards. So what does that make the Labour front bench who haven't got the guts to oppose?
gosub
~#
Government vote was 308, tends to indicate whipping, probably two line. Will have had to pair to miss it
lazythursday
Averagely-Known Member
This is something that puzzles me. At present the candidates are trying to win the Labour Party leadership, not the general election. They seem to have no idea of their electorate. The obvious strategy to play, if you are a New Labour drone, is to give some red meat to the membership now (oppose the government, agree with some totemic policy like renationalising the railways) and then stab them in the back and lurch rightwards once elected. There are five years to suck up to middle England and ignore the grassroots - why do it now?
Similar threads
