Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Where did the idea that India is a spiritual country come from?

If you are looking to learn more about yourself there's plenty of routes to do it. Immersing yourself into a very different culture will make you question and see things from a different perspective. It may not be a spiritual nirvana but if you are open to new experiences observing a more spiritual way of living will surely make an impression.

Not necessarily. As Belushi said before, you can be exposed to this and still be merely projecting whatever junk you have in your mind about such a place and people.
 
Not necessarily. As Belushi said before, you can be exposed to this and still be merely projecting whatever junk you have in your mind about such a place and people.

Exactly. You could define spirituality as projecting what ever junk you have in your mind! Put yourself in an alien environment and unless you are determined not to you a human response is to think about the big things.
 
Exactly. You could define spirituality as projecting what ever junk you have in your mind! Put yourself in an alien environment and unless you are determined not to you a human response is to think about the big things.

Cobblers. Why does it have to be India? Put yourself into an alien environment closer to home and think about the 'big things.'
 
Cobblers. Why does it have to be India? Put yourself into an alien environment closer to home and think about the 'big things.'

But there's alien and there's alien. The culture shock of being abroad is likely to be more shocking isn't it? I think Pickman's is on to something with the historical stuff about the religious shock of India to European culture. The whole assumption of western cultural and religious superiority which was underwriting imperialism is laughable in a country like India. Polytheism is a bit of a eye-opener anyway but polytheists who completely outnumber you, regard your religion as just another interesting path, who've seen foreign rulers come and go a few times before - and *gasp* might have a superior culture to your own? That's a bit of a headfuck for a colonial culture that had got used to patronising noble savages like the maoris or whoever.
 
But there's alien and there's alien. The culture shock of being abroad is likely to be more shocking isn't it? I think Pickman's is on to something with the historical stuff about the religious shock of India to European culture. The whole assumption of western cultural and religious superiority which was underwriting imperialism is laughable in a country like India. Polytheism is a bit of a eye-opener anyway but polytheists who completely outnumber you, regard your religion as just another interesting path, who've seen foreign rulers come and go a few times before - and *gasp* might have a superior culture to your own? That's a bit of a headfuck for a colonial culture that had got used to patronising noble savages like the maoris or whoever.

Please, I've known what it's like to be living somewhere 'alien,' although not India. I've spent a lot of time in Russia, and my partner is Kyrgyz. I don't waffle on about it like some dunderhead.
 
The Kumbh Mela festival, the largest in the world by a long way (60m people :eek: ) is held periodically in India and is a religious/spiritual thang.
 
Please, I've known what it's like to be living somewhere 'alien,' although not India. I've spent a lot of time in Russia, and my partner is Kyrgyz. I don't waffle on about it like some dunderhead.

And indeed I wasn't saying you haven't. Just talking about the impact of India on westerners over the centuries. Why that might give rise to the idea it's a spiritual place. As per the thread title. Why that might be more likely to provoke that response than spending time in another part of your own society. As per your post.
 
I wonder if easteners turning to Britain comment on why do they consider it such an unspiritual place.

They only have the one god the poor things and he doesn't even have multiple arms or anything. Is it any wonder most of them rarely pray?
 
The difference, perhaps, is that a spiritualism is for those who don't have the conviction to accept the dogma of organised religion.
I suppose I could accept that, if that was a reasoned explanation. That's probably the best definition of "spiritualism" in that sense. But I rarely got that impression with some of those I met. It was more a pose to justify themselves as a thinker and came across as a self-imposed label. A very "western" individualised version of spirituality (with a copy of Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance almost a compulsory accessory!)

Yep, I know it's a crass generalisation, but hey...
 
28 replies and not a single reference to british buddhism, to theosophy, or even to british rule in india. florence farr, out of the hermetic order of the golden down, moved to ceylon, now sri lanka, for spiritual reasons. francis younghusband, who was in the expedition to lhasa in 1904, turned buddhist from his experiences in south asia. it's disappointing that there seems to be a belief that british interest in spirituality from the east began with the beatles, when it began a considerable time earlier.
for people who thought that the beatles were the first to tread the path to eastern spirituality, a book worth reading is gary lachman's 'turn off your mind'


Theosophy = load of racist wank.
Hermetic order of the Golden Dawn (or down LOL) fake order based on forgeries

Your post just consolidates for me the idea that India is somewhere where spiritually impoverished white people project their fantasies of spirituality
Also, let's not forget Pierre Barnard aka the Omnipotent Oom, the spiritual leader and guru* who brought tantric yoga to the west

*or sexual predator and serial con man - depending on how you look at it
 
The difference, perhaps, is that a spiritualism is for those who don't have the conviction to accept the dogma of organised religion.

Conviction?

Or the intelligence to recognise the inherent flaws you get when religion is organised. Namely self interest.
 
Theosophy = load of racist wank.
Hermetic order of the Golden Dawn (or down LOL) fake order based on forgeries

Your post just consolidates for me the idea that India is somewhere where spiritually impoverished white people project their fantasies of spirituality
Also, let's not forget Pierre Barnard aka the Omnipotent Oom, the spiritual leader and guru* who brought tantric yoga to the west

*or sexual predator and serial con man - depending on how you look at it
quite possibly it is where 'spiritually impoverished white people' project spiritual fantasies, the grass being always greener etc. but it is imo a bit disappointing that the genealogy of the notion of india as a store of eastern spiritual promise has become somewhat swept under the carpet to the extent that the johnny-come-lately beatles are seen not as following in a load of other people's footsteps but being forerunners.

as for the gd being based on forgeries, it's fair enough to say that the cipher manusciprt or whatnot was not in fact the work on one anna sprengler of stuttgart.
 
Gandhi and a couple of Beatles on holiday does not make a country "spiritual" :hmm:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...mir-all-girl-rock-band-forced-to-disband.html
You might find this interesting:

http://kenanmalik.wordpress.com/2013/02/10/oriental-enlightenment/

Reviewing JJ Clarke’s Oriental Enlightenment, Malik says:
The result is a work more nuanced in its understanding the encounter between East and West. Clarke follows the shifts and turns in Western appropriation of Eastern ideas, from the Enlightenment celebration of China and of Confucianism to the Romantic obsession with India through to contemporary New Ageism and the striking dalliance of a certain store scientists and atheists with Buddhism
 
I think having a shitload of people who are absolutely fucking dirt poor is the thing that comes to mind when I think of those countries that people call 'spiritual'.

I think it's absolutely not cricket to visit a place as a tourist where an averagely poor person wouldn't be able to afford to travel to wherever you're from.
 
Even apart from the economic benefits that tourism brings, that's an absurd thing to say.

Nah, tourism distorts the local economy. AFAIC anyone who travels to a third world country as a tourist is only one step up from a paedophile. Saying that though, they might well be a paedophile jetting around the world on some twisted sex tour jolly. Filthy bastards.
 
Even apart from the economic benefits that tourism brings, that's an absurd thing to say.

I hate poverty tourism. Like when people pay to get taken on tours of slums to gawk at the poor people and how they live.
Some slum occupier will get some money for letting peeps into their home for a gawk which though could be considered opening people's eyes still seems like using the desperate for sideshow purposes to me.

But normal tourism where real jobs are created and injects foreign income into the economy. Better that they do it in India than in rich South of France imo.
 
Gawking definitely brings money into the slum; and is more likely to be distributed locally than in "normal" tourism, where money accrues to land speculators and supranational hotel chains. The more stars your hotel has, the more likely the workforce is to be imported from a city.

The greater the income disparity between the tourist and the people with whom they interact, the greater the chances of income redistribution.
 
India may have a lot of poverty but it also has a current rate of economic growth that the British government would sell their mothers for.
A growth rate that they are moaning about atm because it was even higher previously but it still kicks the shit out of most countries.
 
I hate poverty tourism. Like when people pay to get taken on tours of slums to gawk at the poor people and how they live.
Some slum occupier will get some money for letting peeps into their home for a gawk which though could be considered opening people's eyes still seems like using the desperate for sideshow purposes to me.

But normal tourism where real jobs are created and injects foreign income into the economy. Better that they do it in India than in rich South of France imo.

Ugh. And here. What the middle classes like to get up to. Imagine the stories they can tell back home.
 
Back
Top Bottom