Two firsts for me, first Bresson and first Huillet-Straub.
Diary of a Country Priest - Robert Bresson's film of a young priest tormented by his faith. It's obviously a very good piece of film making and did provoke an emotional response, the case are good in their roles and even the narration works. That said while the film is such a good piece of work that you can't help but feel some of the crisis the priest is going through, there was a part of me that found the ennobling of suffering and pain quite unpleasant.
Antigone - this is less an adaptation of Sophocles play than a simple presentation of it on screen, that can work The Hollow Crown took a similar approach and a lot of those plays were rather good. Here Huillet-Straub take such an approach to an extreme, there is only a series of static shots, the actors only move to leave the "stage" and often the shots do not include the actor(s). I suppose on one level this approach does work as it produces a strong response in the viewer, and viewed as a piece of video art there's something to be said for the film, but as an actually movie, or even a filming of a play, it fails totally. I saw a brilliant version of Antigone live it brought the play to life and made you really feel the characters motives, it was a wonderful adaptation, but this is just totally dead, the actors declaim but the only emotional response is tedium. While seeing a play on screen cannot be the same as seeing it on screen The Hollow Crown and NT Live performances nevertheless show that such screenings can work but Antigone does not, largely because of how the play was shot, though I also felt the translation/subtitling was strange (perhaps because it was verse?). I think I'll take some convincing to watch another Huillet-Straub.