I think we have a winner in the "Trot analysis of Woolwich most likely to win mass working class support" competition:
For Adebolajo and Oluwatobi, Against Imperialist wars in Muslim lands"
http://socialistfight.com/2013/05/3...obi-against-imperialist-wars-in-muslim-lands/
I think we have a winner in the "Trot analysis of Woolwich most likely to win mass working class support" competition:
For Adebolajo and Oluwatobi, Against Imperialist wars in Muslim lands"
http://socialistfight.com/2013/05/3...obi-against-imperialist-wars-in-muslim-lands/
I would be interested in seeing any justification you can cobble together for staying in a party apparently solely on the basis of some historical sympathy with its previous policies while claiming scant support for its current policies.which is equally if not more short-sighted
A slightly more nuanced response would ...
no, not even on the basis of its previous policies (so much). But it's historical roots in the class, its claim to represent w/c interests and the structural ties to the unions - it is still an important site of struggle and occupies a key strategic place. In lots of respects it represents an obstacle - but the fight over the direction of any future Labour government needs to take place inside and outside the party.
Will this cant ever stop?
Is it? looks like that dog died years ago to me. All you have is a stinking, rotting corpaeit is still an important site of struggle
You may mock but the nutters who attempted to get into the cockpit of that aircraftbe an open season on taxi drivers?
and your a fucking troll
fuck off ye mountebank
'mountebank' What??? You do talk some garbage.
Sgt Maj. Or more correctly WO1.don't take just mine, his ex regiment sgnt mjr calls him a billy bullshitter in his bio 'Eye of the Storm'
SAS bio top trumped!
Your sole mention of Bobby SandsThis is exactly the point that was disputed by Bobby Sands. If the govt that runs the legal process does not recognise the war, the killing is not a war killing.