Shame that doesn't seem to translate onto voting when it matters, for example in 2010:
57% of the electorate voted for Con/LD/Lab
35% of the electorate didn't vote
8% of the electorate voted for other parties
Of these the most popular party on the left were the Greens but they only got 265,243 votes (0.6% of the electorate)
Going by the percentages:
23.4% of the total electorate voted Conservative
18.8% of the total electorate voted Labour
14.9% of the total electorate voted LibDem
7.8% of the total electorate voted for others
So in percentage terms of total electorate versus non vote 35% share:
vs Conservative vote share of 23.4% = 11.6% more non-votes
vs Labour vote share of 18.8% = 16.2% more non-voters
vs LibDem vote share of 14.9% = 20.1% more non-voters
vs Others vote share of 7.8% = 27.2% more non-voters
In numbers:
Total electorate: 45,597,461
Total who voted: 29,687,604
Total non-voters: 15,909,857
Total Conservative Votes: 10,700,000
Total Labour Votes: 8,600,000
Total LibDem Votes: 6,800,000
Total Others: 3,600,000 (actually rounded up from a remainder of 3,587,604)
So going from these figures (no shows/non-votes vs votes cast):
9.1 million MORE people didn't show than those who voted LibDem
7.3 million MORE people didn't show than those who voted Labour
5.2 million MORE people didn't show than those who voted Conservative
5.1 million MORE people didn't show than those who voted LibDem & Others combined.
0.5 million MORE people didn't vote than those who voted LibDem & Labour combined.
Only 1.2 million more voters voted for BOTH LibDem & Conservative combined than those who didn't vote at all.
If people felt that their vote mattered, why is it that the amount of non-voters outweighs those who vote for the government of the day? If voter apathy/disgust is the non-problem you seem to be making it out to be, why are political types worried about it?
It would be of interest to see how many of those who turned out to vote in 2010 were 'habitual' voters (those who always vote and always vote for the same party), how many of those who turned out were of the 'it's our duty to vote' types, how many of those who turned out to vote did so but under sufferance (the 'no-one I approve of is standing but i'm going to vote against xyz' type/'i'm going to hold my nose while I cast my vote' type), how many of those who turned out did so enthusiastically as they were all gung-ho about the forthcoming buttfucking and how many of those who turned out to vote were first-time voters. It would also be of interest to see how many of those who turned out in 2010 will not do so in 2015.
Turnout was up 3.7% in 2010 versus the 2005 GE, how much of that was the LD's and Tories smelling blood in the water and making a proper push to get their vote out? Even then they only managed to beat the effective 'none of the above' vote by 2.6% of the total electorate. That's fucking shit in anyone's book.
If voters turn out 'when it counts' then why do 35% of them not show for when it's supposed to
properly count in the general election?