Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Turkey, ISIS, Kurds and Syria

I suppose self-interest won out at the end of the day and really who can blame them when they've been consistently shat on from all directions for a very long time? Still it's a shame; it feels somewhat like a missed opportunity. I know its all vey well for me to sit here typing this when it's not me and my people whose lives are on the line, but even so.
 
Last edited:
Slightly surprised that both Plan C and the AFN are so formally supporting the "Kurdish Struggle" as it seems a little out of the AFN's remit (though can see why they'd stretch to it) and I'd have thought PlanC would be more cautious re. nailing their colours to a "National Liberation" cause.

Not that I'm against either of them doingit, just a little surprised.

I too was a little surprised at the AFN prescence. Some elements of Plan C have been keen supporters of the Rojava project for a while. I chatted to an active Plan C person on the demo and they were fully aware of the issues brought up by BA here, and did say they needed to engage a bit more critically rather than cheerleading it quite so much.
 
I suppose self-interest won out at the end of the day and really who can blame them when they've been consistently shat on from all directions for a very long time? Still it's a shame; it feels somewhat like a missed opportunity. I know its all vey well for me to sit here typing this when it's not me and my people whose lives are on the line, but even so.

I wouldn't be quite so quick to write the whole revolutionary potential of Rojava off yet personally.
 
I sadly think you're more likely than not going to be proved right. Betting on the failure of revolutionary moments to deliver their full potential is always the wise yet depressing reality. :(
 
I wouldn't be quite so quick to write the whole revolutionary potential of Rojava off yet personally.
The continued existence of Rojava is dependent on the health of the wider revolution though - and their current actions are directly undermining that revolution, in fact they're helping to kill it in the north and work to further isolate it and target it in the south. It's bonkers bruno stuff.
 
The continued existence of Rojava is dependent on the health of the wider revolution though - and their current actions are directly undermining that revolution, in fact they're helping to kill it in the north and work to further isolate it and target it in the south. It's bonkers bruno stuff.

This is very true. The situation they currently find themselves in could not have come about without events taking place elsewhere and has to be seen in that context. My feeling is that the regime will use them so long as it's convenient, but given the opportunity will not hesitate to crush them.
 
It's partly emotional though innit. For the Kurds who saw and experienced the ISIS invasion and destruction, taking revenge and beating ISIS obviously takes priority, both tactically and morally, when between 2011-2014 the destruction in Kurdish areas from regime forces was comparatively little compared to both what the regime was doing elsewhere (Homs, Hamaa, ecc) and what ISIS has done since. Kobane lingers on.
Doesn't excuse regime collaboration obviously, and I think as time wears on the reality will sink in with the European left and for the moment the desire for a beacon of inspiration is drowning out calls for a reality check.
 
That's all true and not just on the emotional level - there's good solid reasons for the concentration of the two eastern cantons concentration on steadily removing isis from their areas rather than rushing to raqqa and inviting isis counter-attacks. I'm talking about attacking the FSA from afrin canton in the north Aleppo area and cutting off their supply routes under the cover of russian and regime air-attacks - effectively putting a noose around the necks of the surviving rebels in allepo city and idlib - then kicking out and occupying FSA control supply etc centres in the north Aleppo countryside and strategic positions under clear regime/russia direction.

(There was little or no regime destruction of Kurdish areas btw - they were ceded those cantons without a fight, the regime decided it couldn't defend them/wanted to concentrate on the real enemy and even then the kurdish controlled part of aleppo city was largely left alone/viewed as neutral).
 
butchersapron I'm glad I'm not the only one who (at least) raised an eyebrow at this.

I'm feeling charitable so I wonder if it's comparable to the rush to support the EZLN* back in my day. A rush I enthusiastically joined tbh, and one I still would.

*I'm not comparing the PYD with the EZLN btw but rather the support being given by the types of people giving it?

There's an element of "but it's the new cause, dahling!", unfortunately. It happens with any remotely-radical occurrence that's amenable to co-optation by liberal types.
 
The continued existence of Rojava is dependent on the health of the wider revolution though - and their current actions are directly undermining that revolution, in fact they're helping to kill it in the north and work to further isolate it and target it in the south. It's bonkers bruno stuff.

I agree, but it's a bit unclear as to how much division there is on these actions amongst the people on the ground and also amongst the people making the decisions, and also between them both. I still think it has some potential rather than being a doomed project in its entirety.
 
And this bomb, from the news I've seen, had no clear military aim but was at a public transport intersection in a busy shopping area.
 
Doesn't seem like a very typical Kurdish attack tho. No military or political targrt even.

Bares more of a resemblance to a Daesh or Jihadi opperation.

Given the current situation in Syria, might even be in their interest to muddy the waters and cause problems for the Kurds.
 
Doesn't seem like a very typical Kurdish attack tho. No military or political targrt even.

Bares more of a resemblance to a Daesh or Jihadi opperation.

Given the current situation in Syria, might even be in their interest to muddy the waters and cause problems for the Kurds.
There is nothing for the turkish state to gain in terms of legitimacy or freedom to act - they just did whatever they wanted to across SE turkey and into iraq. They don't need anything else. The PKK though do need something to contain the energies of their younger members in these areas. And a hands off operation that everyone knows was committed with their work/approval would be one way of trying to do that.
 
There is nothing for the turkish state to gain i terms of legitimacy or freedom t act - they just did whatever they wanted to across SE turkey and into iraq. They don't need anything else. The PKK though do need something to contain the energies of their younger members in these areas. And a hands off operation that everyone knows was committed with their work/approval would be one way of trying to do that.
What I meant was IS or whichever Jihadi element (if they did carry out the attack, rather than the Kurds) seeking to make it seem like a Kurdish one. I dont know if that came across clearly in my post? Maybe not.

Since the vehicle was supposedly driven from Kurdistan, the attack targeted Ankara just like the previous one and it happened near to high importance stuff.... Is this a possibility we can rule out at this stage? No Kurdish claim of responsibility so far. There are claims it was a suicide bomber.

Might it not be in the interests of Daesh etc to create such a situation, given the current front against them in Syria?

I don't fully understand your post and im gonna re-read. I just wanted to clarify mine.
 
Turkey is fucked. This cycle of violence is only going to get worse. The state is already frustrated enough with the Russian involvement in Syria limiting its own influence. It's interesting to see how much of a blind eye nato / the United States are willing to turn to the misbehaviour of their allies. I fear that continued state repression combined with economic turmoil and the pressure of the migrant problem (how many Syrians in Turkey? I've heard 2-3 million) could create the conditions for full blown civil war there too.
 
I fear that continued state repression combined with economic turmoil and the pressure of the migrant problem (how many Syrians in Turkey? I've heard 2-3 million) could create the conditions for full blown civil war there too.

Full-blown civil war is impossible. Who would fight whom?
 
Definitely not 2-3 million Syrians left. There's major discrepancy about the numbers. Turkey likes to say they host several million Syrian guests - the reality is somewhat different.
 
Slightly surprised that both Plan C and the AFN are so formally supporting the "Kurdish Struggle" as it seems a little out of the AFN's remit (though can see why they'd stretch to it) and I'd have thought PlanC would be more cautious re. nailing their colours to a "National Liberation" cause.

It's a bit more complicated than 'National Liberation'.
 
Back
Top Bottom