I thought I explained that? Try taking emotion out of it and looking at the actual facts. One last try...:
His political action lead to him being persecuted by the state. He was persecuted for founding and leading the EDL. The EDL did not meet the threshold to be proscribed by the Home Secretary, meaning leading the EDL and protesting with the EDL was supposed to be anyone’s democratic/legal right.
The response of the state however appears to me to have been to prosecute him for something millions of other people commonly did at that time (that’s applying a different standard of justice to Tommy Robinson because he is Tommy Robinson, or, as one of Stalin’s Hench men used to put it ‘show me the man and I will find you the crime’). That’s clearly persecution motivated by politics, that’s not blind justice and fair and impartial application of the same law and standards for all.
The fact that he was officially in prison for mortgage fraud, but his early release conditions were not to associate with people from the EDL, is just more evidence that the ‘real’ reason he was in prison was for leading and organising the EDL.
Let me put it another way by asking you a question if I may: If Tommy hadn’t been the leader of the EDL and wasn’t involved in politics, then do you honestly believe he would have ended up been locked up for lending a family member money to get a deposit on a house when nobody (including the bank) lost a penny?