from the Metro
Lawyers for Mr Robinson said he contacted the then-15-year-old boy who pushed Jamal in the footage, who is known in the case as ‘B’, along with three parents of children who had allegedly been assaulted by Jamal. Their application said it was in the public interest to publicise B’s version of events as there was ‘far more to the story’.
But they will not get to make the defence in court as the judge said there was a ‘complete absence of chronology’ for Mr Robinson’s investigations.
Lawyers for Jamal argued Mr Robinson had very little time to carry out the interviews he claims to have conducted as his videos were published one and two days after the attack respectively.
Mr Justice Nicklin added: ‘In order to disclose a case with a real prospect of success, (Robinson) must make clear when the various interviews, and other steps upon which he places reliance, took place.’ He added the EDL founder has still failed to provide the names of anyone who accused Jamal of being violent towards them. However he said ‘the door is not finally closed’ to a public interest defence and will consider a more detailed application that properly explains the timeline.
The judge also accepted amendments to Robinson’s existing defence that his claims were true, which added further details to known allegations against Jamal as well as three new alleged incidents.
The trial continues.