She is indisputably British. If you recall the government’s argument was that on being rendered stateless she would be in a position to apply for Bangladeshi citizenship on the basis of her parents’ current or previous nationality. I am not sure she has been convicted of terrorist crimes. I’m not sure British courts are big on in absentia convicions.
Mr Yaxley-Lennon, in the other hand, has indisputably been convicted of serious (although non-terrorist) offences. One assumes that now being resident of Spain, under the EU freedom of movement rights, he is in a position to apply for Spanish nationality in due course, and therefore could have his Brutish citizenship withdrawn without leaving him stateless.
What’s source for goose..even if the analogy is a little stretched.