belboid
Exasperated, not angry.
Members writing for the 43 group paper according to this
From anti-fascist war to Cold War | Steve Silver
From anti-fascist war to Cold War | Steve Silver
It would be interesting to find out how the CP justified its juggling act between its national position and the 43 group.Members writing for the 43 group paper according to this
From anti-fascist war to Cold War | Steve Silver
Great stuff, haven't read this one yetChapter one of British Communism and the Politics of Race goes into this - if i remember right it was as simple as glorifying a fake pic of cable street as the key to building a mass movement concerned not just with 'race', but then v diff on the local level - much as Joe Jacobs recounts happening in the 30s in the lead up to Cable street.
Sadly, it's pretty shit - it's an explicitly 'intersectionalist' look at this history and reads a bit like a woke-whig.Great stuff, haven't read this one yet
Isnt the author some sort of Trot?Sadly, it's pretty shit - it's an explicitly 'intersectionalist' look at this history and reads a bit like a woke-whig.
He's an academic in australia who seems very focused on the CPGB rather than trotskysism - has a book on the History of No Platform in the NUS/CPGB/etc coming out - or was supposed to have been coming out for some time. Doesn't look to have ever been active in any orgs.Isnt the author some sort of Trot?
Sorry got him confused with Ewan Gibbs. Yes I contributed something to his book on No Platform when he put a call out but god knows if he'll use it.He's an academic in australia who seems very focused on the CPGB rather than trotskysism - has a book on the History of No Platform in the NUS/CPGB/etc coming out - or was supposed to have been coming out for some time. Doesn't look to have ever been active in any orgs.
The best I can explain it is like trades unionism. Everyone joins for a common goal (protect jobs, collectively bargain for pay and conditions) but not everyone has to fit a particular mould of what a trade unionist must look like.
As mentioned above there's some supposed anti fascists who are pushing it towards being a niche when actually the direction of travel should be opposite direction.
Some of the people calling themselves anti-fascists currently, are of similar politics to the pissants who've spent decades condemning anti-fascists for violence. This is merely a pose for them.
I got roped into addressing an Extinction Rebellion meeting - about 60 people present - recently. The evening's subject was "non-violent direct action". I asked how many had been on a protest where the police had got a bit lairy, and half a dozen hands went up. I asked how many would fight back if the police came in batons swinging. No hands went up. My reply to this was "and that's why you won't get your demands met - you still believe that the Gandhi route will work, in this time and this place. When the state gets fed up treating you with kid gloves, they'll break your heads, and you'll sit there and take it, and let yourselves be beaten and arrested". I find it hard to comprehend just how strategically bereft XR are. They have good tactics, but their strategy is so narrow that it's easy to derail. My point here is that XR members tend to call themselves anti-fascist too, but seem to wage "struggle" purely on the verbal level.
Some of the people calling themselves anti-fascists currently, are of similar politics to the pissants who've spent decades condemning anti-fascists for violence. This is merely a pose for them.
I got roped into addressing an Extinction Rebellion meeting - about 60 people present - recently. The evening's subject was "non-violent direct action". I asked how many had been on a protest where the police had got a bit lairy, and half a dozen hands went up. I asked how many would fight back if the police came in batons swinging. No hands went up. My reply to this was "and that's why you won't get your demands met - you still believe that the Gandhi route will work, in this time and this place. When the state gets fed up treating you with kid gloves, they'll break your heads, and you'll sit there and take it, and let yourselves be beaten and arrested". I find it hard to comprehend just how strategically bereft XR are. They have good tactics, but their strategy is so narrow that it's easy to derail. My point here is that XR members tend to call themselves anti-fascist too, but seem to wage "struggle" purely on the verbal level.
Have you come across XR referring to themselves as "anti fascists"? .
My experience of them is that that struggle hasn't even registered with them. For most this is the first political thing they've ever done.
Not sure you were actually addressing my point which was more we should be drawing people in who are up for fighting fascists but don’t see themselves as communists and (gasp) may identify more with national identity over class, rather than working with every Tom, Dick and Hippy who are vaguely in the sphere.
My point is that sadly the most politically-active group at the mo is a bunch of people who have got little clue. People who I'll work with on certain things, but who I wouldn't want beside me in physical force direct action because they think you can "work with" the state.
Anti-fascism doesn't draw that many people in, even when it would benefit them, for the same reasons it never has: Many people abhor violence even as a last resort (foolishly, IMO); many people avoid confrontation; many people are atomised from ideas of collective action, and the benefits to their community. Lastly, many people suffer from the popular delusion that "someone else will fight the fight for me".
As for national identity over class, I worked with many anti-Nazi skins in the '80s. Some people who lionise their British identity are fine, because they're clued up enough to understand that the nation is its people - all of them, not just the ones that sunburn easily. The people you want will rally to the cause when (not if) the time comes, just like they always have, but what you won't get is a movement in the way the term is currently understood. Movements can be suborned by wasters like the SWP, and members lose sight of their goals. Collective action through loose networks, on an as-needed basis has always worked better.
And you know what? Most of those who'll take up the fight will be working class. Why? Because we have the lived experience to know what's necessary, and the will to do it unmediated by middle class ideas about correct behaviour. That's why I mentioned XR and their narrowly-defined behaviours - because they're thoroughly m/c, and will founder on those behaviours, regardless of the righteousness of their aims.
TLDR: Political purity is bollocks,
It’ll soon grow in popularity. And politics. In a decade or two.
I think the point is we don't have a decade, let alone two.
Oh goody. It’ll happen sooner then.
Armageddon?
attacking a pensioner's fist?Anyone know what his court case in September is over?
Apparently tommy robinson could face a further custodial sentence, so I doubt its a to do with a pensioner, thats normally dealt with by the prison warden isn't it?attacking a pensioner's fist?
i had a quick search but couldn't dig anything outApparently tommy robinson could face a further custodial sentence, so I doubt its a to do with a pensioner, thats normally dealt with by the prison warden isn't it?
The police are applying for him to be given a football banning order, presumably because he keeps getting into fights at Luton and England games.Anyone know what his court case in September is over?