Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The Tuts make dubious allegations after Brixton Windmill gig

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hardly anyone on here is rushing to blindly back the venue. Mostly people seem keen to provide some balance to this ridiculous witch hunt based on ill considered statements of judgement like that highlighted above.

I know it's trite to say so, especially as I've already said similar, but pubs are very much "my house, my rules" establishments.
 
I think some bands do do it, and get away with it.

But they tend to be selling 15,000+ tickets; not getting some of their mates along to a pub who they then encourage to go elsewhere after their set. It's really poor form.
Just to be clear here, because a few people seem to have confused a couple of incidents:

The band telling people to go elsewhere was Allo Darlin' - that happened a couple of years (?) ago. They were encouraging people to go see another band, the Lovely Eggs. (Who AD fans would probably like). There's no connection with last night's incident, other than that both were at the Windmill and both thrown out.
 
Infinite Jest said:
Just to be clear here, because a few people seem to have confused a couple of incidents:

The band telling people to go elsewhere was Allo Darlin' - that happened a couple of years (?) ago. They were encouraging people to go see another band, the Lovely Eggs.
Just in case you weren't aware of it, the Lovely Eggs were playing an event put on by an urban75-related club that night.

So it was all our fault
;-)
 
Rushy said:
My suspicion is that the lady in question (and her friends) are resorting to trial by Tweet because they are not confident they would come out smelling of roses if the case were properly investigated.

Far easier to fuck up a venue and possibly damage a man's reputation and livelihood with rumour and innuendo than have 'the hassle' of him defend himself against the allegations with the possibility of inconvenient eye witnesses coming out of the woodwork. Which opens them up to accusations of slander. Hope they've got decent lawyers.
 
Just in case you weren't aware of it, the Lovely Eggs were playing an event put on by an urban75-related club that night.

So it was all our fault
;-)

You heartless monster! ;-)

(Oh well, this thread has reminded me that I had an account here and should spend some more time here, so not all bad...)
 
@ C66
Well, libel. They've tweeted all over the shop, exhorted people to retweet the accusations and destroy his business. And all because some lead singer got pissed and lairy, threw a few punches and then in the cold light of the morning decided that it was racist. Who'd've thunk it? Lead singers are normally such quiet types with tiny egos.
 
Infinite Jest said:
Just to be clear here, because a few people seem to have confused a couple of incidents:

The band telling people to go elsewhere was Allo Darlin' - that happened a couple of years (?) ago. They were encouraging people to go see another band, the Lovely Eggs. (Who AD fans would probably like). There's no connection with last night's incident, other than that both were at the Windmill and both thrown out.

Ah, OK. Fair dos.
 
@ C66
Well, libel. They've tweeted all over the shop, exhorted people to retweet the accusations and destroy his business. And all because some lead singer got pissed and lairy, threw a few punches and then in the cold light of the morning decided that it was racist. Who'd've thunk it? Lead singers are normally such quiet types with tiny egos.

*tuts*

*walks away*
 
Update:

My girlfriend has come in from work and she was in the room when it started:

Here's what she saw/witnessed:

I was in the room when the trouble started. Seamus dashed over to where the band were, there was some shouting, then he went to grab the singer in the way that bouncers grab someone to bundle them out of the room, I.e. arms around their body to contain them and so it's easier to move them. She moved so he actually ended up grabbing her hair. Then it all moved outside. I think he could have handled the situation better by talking rather than acting but it didn't look like an aggressive assault to me. Unfortunately the shouting that continued outside the venue from Seamus and a couple of their regular punters in the faces of people who weren't involved at all in the scuffle was aggressive and unnecessary.
 
I take it everyone rushing to back the venue on principle has never sneaked a drink into any gig/cinema/whatever? Good for you.
No-one comes out of a scuffle like this looking good, but there's a reason our natural instinct is to ask 'who started it?' and I hope we can all agree that breaking a rule is not on the same moral plain as verbal abuse and physical confrontation.
She had alcohol she shouldn't have had, and the landlord had every right to ask her to leave, or better still, ask the promoter to have a word. However, the landlord was also drinking and possibly his judgement was impaired, I don't know. What I do know is that he didn't ask her anything, or speak to the promoter - what he did was steam in swearing at her, which she responded to in kind. He then tried to grab her, and it kicked off. She may well have pissed him off by her actions, but the incident itself was entirely his fault because of the way he handled it. Would she have gone quietly? I don't see why not, but we'll never know, will we? No-one spoke to her in a reasonable and professional manner.
Now, I don't know the man, and for all I know he might be a lovely bloke 99.99% of the time or unless his sore points are pushed, but the point here is that it was his job to handle the situation, which he did incredibly badly, and things escalated from there.
As an observer attempting to be neutral, I have to admit I didn't see everything, but I did see the crowd outside the pub being completely calm, certainly not pissed (this was only 9pm) and trying to reason with the management, whereas the lads on the door were drunk, lary and sexist to a man.

In my experience a certain type of bloke has a problem with women asserting themselves, let alone defending themselves, and I think there's an element of that here, both from what I witnessed last night, and a lot of comments on this forum. Some people could also do with watching Jodie Foster in The Accused if you think it's ok to use a woman's 'history' and behaviour against her to justify violence. Good to know decades of feminist thought have affected you all so deeply.

I won't be going back to the Windmill. Which I'm sure they're gutted about.

You appear to think that merely being a woman gives one a license to behave like an arsehole and not expect consequences.
 
Blagsta said:
You appear to think that merely being a woman gives one a license to behave like an arsehole and not expect consequences.

Or that the consequences are driven by racial and gender prejudice.
 
Update:

My girlfriend has come in from work and she was in the room when it started:

Here's what she saw/witnessed:

I was in the room when the trouble started. Seamus dashed over to where the band were, there was some shouting, then he went to grab the singer in the way that bouncers grab someone to bundle them out of the room, I.e. arms around their body to contain them and so it's easier to move them. She moved so he actually ended up grabbing her hair. Then it all moved outside. I think he could have handled the situation better by talking rather than acting but it didn't look like an aggressive assault to me. Unfortunately the shouting that continued outside the venue from Seamus and a couple of their regular punters in the faces of people who weren't involved at all in the scuffle was aggressive and unnecessary.

Cheers Trev, that sounds a little saner and more like the sort of thing that happens...
 
sorry, jodie foster has covered the shop assistants?
not at all. she's had some traumatic times like when she was being pursued in a basement by a mad serial killer and all that to-do with hannibal lecter. so she can get away with some things you'd pull other people up for.
 
Update:

My girlfriend has come in from work and she was in the room when it started:

Here's what she saw/witnessed:

I was in the room when the trouble started. Seamus dashed over to where the band were, there was some shouting, then he went to grab the singer in the way that bouncers grab someone to bundle them out of the room, I.e. arms around their body to contain them and so it's easier to move them. She moved so he actually ended up grabbing her hair. Then it all moved outside. I think he could have handled the situation better by talking rather than acting but it didn't look like an aggressive assault to me. Unfortunately the shouting that continued outside the venue from Seamus and a couple of their regular punters in the faces of people who weren't involved at all in the scuffle was aggressive and unnecessary.

Based on what's been said already about the Tuts gig, that sounds quite plausible.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom