hogs of war?
hogs of war?
It would be interesting to know , as it might give a clue as to what kind of wars theyve got planned...or not. Maybe the money is going into non-frontline things?
Just so we don't forget Mike:
Pence attacked Clinton for email while conducting public business using AOL account that was hacked
“The fact that these emails are stored in a private AOL account is crazy to me.”
AOL Email? I didn't know it even still exists.
Its not the meeting the Russians that the problem its the lying about it. A principle legal officer of a government, that thinks purjury is OK is not a good look
With Trumps recently announced record increase in the military budget, does that include a breakdown of what it will be spent on?
Its not the meeting the Russians that the problem its the lying about it. A principle legal officer of a government, that thinks purjury is OK is not a good look
The US military suffers from a disease of the tool, the money will just be used to inflate contractor budgets and lobbying-costs, they'll spank it all on ridiculous things like high-tech robo-donkeys and electric spectacles or even the F35 and buy replacement pieces for a game where the only winning move is never to play.
Tbh, I think this baloney witch-hunt is bollocks. when people who are against Trump finally get their act together, perhaps they can stop chasing nonsense and start in on real issues.... surely by now we've all forgotten about whatever was in those dodgy emails and can stop with the "Russia! Boo!" distractions... I mean is it really that vital to box Trump in re détente with Russia? If not- I reckon the US should just do us all a favour launch it's pre-emptive nuclear strikes already... groundworks been laid, let's get on with it.
The fact that the Osprey is still flying is proof that they're stuck on expensive technology, to the detriment of other, more cost effective things.
Osprey Down: Marines Shift Story on Controversial Warplane’s Safety Record
'baloney witch-hunt' is an odd description of provable lies given under oath at a hearing to determine whether someone was fit to hold public office. That the role is Attorney General is even worse
He spoke to the Russian ambassador at ome event... was it about the campaign? To that he apparently said no. That he spoke to the guy is now caste as a lie. I'm not saying it's not a clever move, they took Trumps rook, now they want his bishop. No need to get all shrill about it though, I mean... let's try not to get quite so emotionally involved in these sensational narratives. I mean you can if you want, knock yourself out if you like being politiked so much.
Tbh, I think this baloney witch-hunt is bollocks. when people who are against Trump finally get their act together, perhaps they can stop chasing nonsense and start in on real issues.... surely by now we've all forgotten about whatever was in those dodgy emails and can stop with the "Russia! Boo!" distractions... I mean is it really that vital to box Trump in re détente with Russia? If not- I reckon the US should just do us all a favour launch it's pre-emptive nuclear strikes already... groundworks been laid, let's get on with it.
Or- how about holiding him to his big-arm-movement promises re infrastructure and the blue-collar class, if those promises meant anything why the big spend on stupid walls and shinny new tanks? Probably the new money that isn't there is being promised to the military to maintain their support... the "Russia! Boo!" stuff just plays into the same old logic. I mean fuckit I don't care, he's their president.... I'm jus sayin.
Alternative looks?Its not the meeting the Russians that the problem its the lying about it. A principle legal officer of a government, that thinks purjury is OK is not a good look
He spoke to Ambassador at one public event, and had another private one on one meeting with him in his office. Asked twice in his hearing whether he had had meetings with the Russians, he said no, first ask WAS in relation to the campaign, second ask two minutes later was about any meetings at all. Again he said no. Then he was presented with minutes of the hearing and signed off on them without amendment. To now say "I didn't discuss the election campaign" may seem to him like "did not have sexual relations" clever pin head dancing, but it isn't. Its purjury.
and is it the same money he wants to spend tarting up the nukes?With Trumps recently announced record increase in the military budget, does that include a breakdown of what it will be spent on?
and is it the same money he wants to spend tarting up the nukes?
"Worse than the McCarthy era", seriously?Look, I'm not going to come to the defence of the gimp-looking-like weirdo who hates female body-sovereignty, it's just that in amongst all the fiddly detail I can't help noticing the whopping great slab of agenda going on here and the overall direction it's taking us in. Take what happened to that block-head Flynn for example... while he's been taken off the board, John McCain and Lindsey Graham have been running around literally egging foreign governments on to waging wars, they were involved in the recent flare-up in Ukraine for example, and yet so far there's been no sign of this guy...
It's stupid, and hysterical, worse than the McCarthy era. Utterly blinkered. And it's not like there aren't plenty of better things to attack Trump on than going on about Russia all the time because the idea he wants detente there makes him Putins Puppet. I'm not being serious when I say fuckit, let's launch the nukes already... but honestly, where does seemingly everyone in the West think we're going with this? It's as if we're descended into the mentality of Holy War for some reason, in service to what god? Fuck knows. Some guy spoke to a Russian! OMG!!! Burn the witch!
never heard of Peggy Noonan before- but from this it does seem that way. Lying to themselves as well as everyone though? in noonans case it reads like she wouldn't know the differenceBesides their obviously cowardly, deferential and stupid nature I wonder whether centrist journos aren't also thinking along the lines that since something has happened that never should have happened, it must naturally come to an end. Initially that manifested itself in constant stories about how THIS NEXT THING was the end of Trump, now that is obviously not going to happen they have decided to invent themselves a change to this disruption of the natural order.
With Trumps recently announced record increase in the military budget, does that include a breakdown of what it will be spent on?
Um no. Perhaps read a bit more about the House Un American Activities Committee (and the versions that came before and after it) and you'll find there's little to compare with the situation now. It's really sloppy to make the comparison - bit like calling anyone who's right wing a Nazi.Look, I'm not going to come to the defence of the gimp-looking-like weirdo who hates female body-sovereignty, it's just that in amongst all the fiddly detail I can't help noticing the whopping great slab of agenda going on here and the overall direction it's taking us in. Take what happened to that block-head Flynn for example... while he's been taken off the board, John McCain and Lindsey Graham have been running around literally egging foreign governments on to waging wars, they were involved in the recent flare-up in Ukraine for example, and yet so far there's been no sign of this guy...
It's stupid, and hysterical, worse than the McCarthy era. Utterly blinkered. And it's not like there aren't plenty of better things to attack Trump on than going on about Russia all the time because the idea he wants detente there makes him Putins Puppet. I'm not being serious when I say fuckit, let's launch the nukes already... but honestly, where does seemingly everyone in the West think we're going with this? It's as if we're descended into the mentality of Holy War for some reason, in service to what god? Fuck knows. Some guy spoke to a Russian! OMG!!! Burn the witch!
Fascinating isnt it ?...within living memory ..... we had the Republicans McCarthyist reds under the bed ....destroyer of careers and lives.... with claims of the democrats being TRAITORS and COLLABORATORS with the RUSSIANS.....acting in TREASON against the american PEOPLE
and yet , here we are ....with a president in hock to Russian Oligarchs ...and don't mention the beds
a complete role reversal
amazing, no ,really....very amazing.....the most amazing thing ever
Just what would Ronnie say
Just what would Ronnie say
This doctor turned congressman who's at the forefront of dismantling the Affordable Care Act can get all the way to fuck
I'm no Bible scholar, but talk about quoting Jesus Christ out of context!
“Just like Jesus said, ‘The poor will always be with us,’” he said. “There is a group of people that just don’t want health care and aren’t going to take care of themselves.”
“Just, like, homeless people. … I think just morally, spiritually, socially, [some people] just don’t want health care,” he said. “The Medicaid population, which is [on] a free credit card, as a group, do probably the least preventive medicine and taking care of themselves and eating healthy and exercising. And I’m not judging, I’m just saying socially that’s where they are. So there’s a group of people that even with unlimited access to health care are only going to use the emergency room when their arm is chopped off or when their pneumonia is so bad they get brought [into] the ER.”
But a more fundamental element of smug disdain for Kim Davis went unchallenged: the contention, at bottom, that Davis was not merely wrong in her convictions, but that her convictions were, in themselves, an error and a fraud.
That is: Kim Davis was not only on the wrong side of the law. She was not even a subscriber to a religious ideology that had found itself at moral odds with American culture. Rather, she was a subscriber to nothing, a hateful bigot who did not even understand her own religion.
Christianity, as many hastened to point out, is about love. Christ commands us to render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. If the Bible took any position on the issue at all, it was that divorce, beloved by Davis, was a sin, and that she was a hypocrite masquerading among the faithful.
How many of these critiques were issued by atheists?
This, more than anything I can recall in recent American life, is an example of the smug style. Many liberals do not believe that evangelical Christianity ought to guide public life; many believe, moreover, that the moral conceits of that Christianity are wrong, even harmful to society. But to the smug liberal, it isn't that Kim Davis is wrong. How can she be? She's only mistaken. She just doesn't know the Good Facts, even about her own religion. She's angry and confused, another hick who's not with it.
It was an odd thing to assert in the case of Christianity, a religion that until recently was taken to be another shibboleth of the uncool, not a loving faith misunderstood by bigots. But this is knowing: knowing that the new line on Jesus is that the homophobes just don't get their own faith.
Kim Davis was behind the times. Her beliefs did not represent a legitimate challenge to liberal consensus because they did not represent a challenge at all: They were incoherent, at odds with the Good Facts. Google makes every man a theologian.
This, I think, is fundamental to understanding the smug style. If good politics and good beliefs are just Good Facts and good tweets — that is, if there is no ideology beyond sensible conclusions drawn from a rational assessment of the world — then there are no moral fights, only lying liars and the stupid rubes who believe them.
When Davis was first released from county jail, Mike Huckabee went to meet her. But the smug style sees no true ideology there, no moral threat to contend with. Only a huckster and a hick: one to be ridiculed, and the other to be refuted. What more, the smug man posts, could there be to say about it? They're idiots! Look, look: This Onion article nails it.