Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The Trump presidency

Status
Not open for further replies.
On Reuters Exclusive: Trump administration has found only $20 million in existing funds for wall - document
...
The rapid start of construction, promised throughout Trump's campaign and in an executive order issued in January on border security, was to be financed, according to the White House, with "existing funds and resources" of the Department of Homeland Security.

But so far, the DHS has identified only $20 million that can be re-directed to the multi-billion-dollar project, according to a document prepared by the agency and distributed to congressional budget staff last week.

The document said the funds would be enough to cover a handful of contracts for wall prototypes, but not enough to begin construction of an actual barrier. This means that for the wall to move forward, the White House will need to convince Congress to appropriate funds.

An internal report, previously reported by Reuters, estimated that fully walling off or fencing the entire southern border would cost $21.6 billion - $9.3 million per mile of fence and $17.8 million per mile of wall.
...
My bold, so there's enough in the kitty for just a tad over one mile of wall.
 
On Reuters Exclusive: Trump administration has found only $20 million in existing funds for wall - document
My bold, so there's enough in the kitty for just a tad over one mile of wall.
No problem. For that budget they’ll easily be able to build the full length wall.

So long is it is made of Lego and two bricks high (0.0318m*$20000000/($0.1 per brick)=6360km of bricks for a wall of ~3100km length).
Maybe they can run to four bricks high (38.4mm) if Donny can make a great deal, the best deal.
 
I know, I know, a tweet, but some of the reactions to yet another Trump team member meeting the Russians is pretty funny.

 
This is all the logical conclusion of the media relationship with politicians pre-Trump. These are people who have forgotten to think, they don't know how to talk about policy and have spent decades cultivating an audience for a reality TV show with a cast of politicians as characters.
One frightening thing the media ignored about the speech....
President Donald Trump’s proposal to establish an office for victims of immigrant crime may be the most controversial proposal of his controversy-ridden treatment of immigration.....The goal is to provide support to victims of crimes perpetrated by people who are in the country illegally. But that seemingly benign purpose drew the only audible protests during Trump’s speech Tuesday night before Congress, and the plan to establish the office, say critics, is intended to demonize immigrants by painting them as predators bent on victimizing Americans.
Why Trump’s victims’ rights plan drew boos during Tuesday night’s speech
 
C56h9IGWcAEK6ES.jpg


Donald Trump visit ‘will shift to Scotland to deter protests’


Yeah, How'd that work out for the G8?
 
Last edited:
On War On The Rocks DOOMSDAY CANCELLED: TRUMP IS GOOD NEWS FOR ALLIES AND WORLD PEACE
...
Good News for World Peace

Paradoxically, Trump’s tweets and the theatrics are most likely to enhance world peace. They create unpredictability and anxiety that the United States can use to obtain greater concessions from friends and foes. It is admittedly still early days, but all indications are that Trump will succeed in coercing his allies in both Asia and Europe to increase their defense spending significantly. Few of them will reach 2 percent of GDP in the next year or two, but he has set in motion a process that will make most allies spend far more much faster than they otherwise would have. His unpredictability is also an asset in America’s dealings with its opponents such as China, Iran, North Korea, and Russia. They will all need to think twice about provoking the United States and its allies militarily because they have no way of calculating how President Trump will react. Neither friends nor foes can be certain that Trump will not do something that a rational cost-benefit calculating actor would not. U.S. allies used to regard American threats to withdraw its forces as bluff because the costs of doing so would be prohibitive, and the same logic has induced American opponents to engage in military risk-taking with little fear of U.S. military retaliation. With Trump in the White House, this logic no longer applies. This is good news because the likely result is strengthened U.S. alliances and U.S. opponents that are more likely to favor negotiation over provocation in their efforts to settle differences with the United States and its allies.
Well it probably is true Trump will provoke more defence spending.

But is a bullshit ladened US President good for world security?

Presidents as Bashar Assad has pointed out rarely are good to their word in foreign affairs. Bush promised a humbler foreign policy and seized the unipolar moment after 9-11 to reshape the ME in the image of Mall America starting with Baghdad. Obama went to Cairo and promised a blossoming of democracy only to deliver wider drone warfare and effective support for dictators. Presidents rather than shaping the world tend to be overtaken by events and bent out of shape by them.

Trump comes into office at a fairly high point of US power. There's a large deficit but the US looks a better bet than most and so has access to practically free money. It has a relatively stable economy with low unemployment and slow growth. It's engaged in a scattering of minor wars against pathetically weak opponents. Iran's nukes are seemingly contained. North Korea's are not. The US at least a has relatively friendly relations with the only country that can help with that China despite some brinksmanship in the South China sea. The old Russian enemy sneaking out of containment but also determindly avoiding direct conflict with the US. Global Warming is a problem nobody wants to deal with but that's not new. This is objectively a pretty good hand to be dealt.

Yet Trump is practically running in emergency mode and its plainly chaotic. He appears genuinely driven by popular whims of the moment. He's wasted a great deal of energy on his "Muslim Ban". Popular with GOP voters but also a genuinely perverse policy from a US security perspective. He governs by stunts in which he is the hero sometimes saving a few jobs here and there. What will he be like when the first crisis hits? And it will hit because a chaotic Team Trump looks like an unmissable window of opportunity.
 
On War On The Rocks DOOMSDAY CANCELLED: TRUMP IS GOOD NEWS FOR ALLIES AND WORLD PEACE
Well it probably is true Trump will provoke more defence spending.

But is a bullshit ladened US President good for world security?

Presidents as Bashar Assad has pointed out rarely are good to their word in foreign affairs. Bush promised a humbler foreign policy and seized the unipolar moment after 9-11 to reshape the ME in the image of Mall America starting with Baghdad. Obama went to Cairo and promised a blossoming of democracy only to deliver wider drone warfare and effective support for dictators. Presidents rather than shaping the world tend to be overtaken by events and bent out of shape by them.

Trump comes into office at a fairly high point of US power. There's a large deficit but the US looks a better bet than most and so has access to practically free money. It has a relatively stable economy with low unemployment and slow growth. It's engaged in a scattering of minor wars against pathetically weak opponents. Iran's nukes are seemingly contained. North Korea's are not. The US at least a has relatively friendly relations with the only country that can help with that China despite some brinksmanship in the South China sea. The old Russian enemy sneaking out of containment but also determindly avoiding direct conflict with the US. Global Warming is a problem nobody wants to deal with but that's not new. This is objectively a pretty good hand to be dealt.

Yet Trump is practically running in emergency mode and its plainly chaotic. He appears genuinely driven by popular whims of the moment. He's wasted a great deal of energy on his "Muslim Ban". Popular with GOP voters but also a genuinely perverse policy from a US security perspective. He governs by stunts in which he is the hero sometimes saving a few jobs here and there. What will he be like when the first crisis hits? And it will hit because a chaotic Team Trump looks like an unmissable window of opportunity.

And, according to reports, he's trying to do a back room deal with Putin over the Crimea in order to lift sanctions.
Expect a tweet along these lines anytime soon.

"Me and Vlad offered a fabulous deal, fabulous,to the Ukrainian govt, the Russians offered to lease the Crimea for 99 years, and in return the US offered to lift sanctions on Russia,
However the Ukraine turned it down, sad so sad, if these losers,however, can't recognise a brilliantly negotiated deal, not my fault, but in respect to the Russians who have played fair and square we intend to lift the sanctions anyway.
And sadly, we must recognise if the Ukrainians can't accept brilliant deals such as I negotiated and offered, then they can't expect the US to step in and help if they insist on offending our dear friends in the Kremlin"
 
And, according to reports, he's trying to do a back room deal with Putin over the Crimea in order to lift sanctions.
Expect a tweet along these lines anytime soon.

"Me and Vlad offered a fabulous deal, fabulous,to the Ukrainian govt, the Russians offered to lease the Crimea for 99 years, and in return the US offered to lift sanctions on Russia,
However the Ukraine turned it down, sad so sad, if these losers,however, can't recognise a brilliantly negotiated deal, not my fault, but in respect to the Russians who have played fair and square we intend to lift the sanctions anyway.
And sadly, we must recognise if the Ukrainians can't accept brilliant deals such as I negotiated and offered, then they can't expect the US to step in and help if they insist on offending our dear friends in the Kremlin"
yeh. you know a tweet's 140 characters of text max?
 
In FP Donald Trump is Importing Asia’s Cronyism
Donald Trump’s ascension to the White House has brought with it a level of personal and family aggrandizement unprecedented in modern American life. Trump appears willing and eager to use all the powers of the executive branch at his disposal to reward his family, his businesses, and his friends. In the first month of his presidency, Trump held three official meetings at his own resort, Mar-a-Lago, reportedly costing U.S. taxpayers $10 million. But more than that, Trump and his family are also using the power of the U.S. government to attempt to punish real or perceived enemies. Not only has Trump directly criticized companies, but Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, recently called upon the leadership at Time Warner to punish its subsidiary CNN for running negative stories about the president and his family.

Half a globe away, South Korean President Park Geun-hye faces impeachment for her own abuse of office. Park — the daughter of strongman Park Chung-hee, who ruled Korea from 1961 to 1979 — reportedly used her political power to secure admission to an elite university for the daughter of her close confidante, Choi Soon-sil. She also used pressure and threats to extort close to $100 million in “donations” to set up a think tank that would serve as a sinecure for her and Choi upon leaving office. Lee Jae-yong, the de facto head of Samsung — the country’s biggest and most important conglomerate — and grandson of its founder, was arrested in early February, charged with offering Park up to $38 million in bribes.
...
Swampy.
trumpswamp-sack.png
 
On Bloomberg Rattled by Russia, Sweden Plans to Bring Back Conscription
...
After falling throughout the 1990s and the start of the millennium, Swedish defense spending has stabilized at 1.1 percent of gross domestic product. The government now wants to reverse the trend and is targeting an increase of more than 30 percent by 2020.

The minority government can push through compulsory military service without the backing of parliament since the initiative doesn’t require a law change.

In an interview Thursday with the Svenska Dagbladet newspaper, Foreign Minister Margot Wallstrom described a potential military build-up by the U.S. and talk by Donald Trump of nuclear rearmament as “very worrying.”

“If countries such as the U.S. increase military spending, there is a risk that other countries feel forced to follow,” Wallstrom said. “It feels like this takes us back many, many years in time. It feels outdated and counterproductive in our time.”

Trump has proposed raising U.S. defense spending by $54 billion, or 10 percent above the current defense budget cap, and to oversee “one of the greatest military buildups in American history."

In a further sign of discord toward the new U.S. administration, the Swedish government has decided to raise the amount of foreign aid for sexual and reproductive health and rights by 200 million kronor ($22.1 million). The move comes after Trump decided in January to reinstate a policy that blocks U.S. taxpayers’ dollars from funding abortions abroad.

"When they go low, we go high," Swedish Development Minister Isabella Lovin tweeted Thursday, citing former First Lady Michele Obama.
Obviously this is really to hold back the Muslamic hordes of Malmo.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom