Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The Kiss Your Arse Goodbye Thread

I have to say its nice to see us travelling back 50, 60, 80 years to find excuses for what Russia did last week :thumbs:
They're only excuses if you choose to forget history. These are only the latest atrocities in a vicious circle. Those on here still around will be talking about others in 10 or 20 years time, and any major or lesser power could be responsible.
 
tbf it like smashing up your neighbour car and then going you had a party last year

not sure why so many people still keep draggin up the same lines on this subject

:hmm:
 
They're only excuses if you choose to forget history. These are only the latest atrocities in a vicious circle. Those on here still around will be talking about others in 10 or 20 years time, and any major or lesser power could be responsible.

Your powers of prognostication will have done you proud I'm sure. I think you just don't like people expressing anger about war, or a war, but I wonder, is that just because you're tired of feeling angry about war or a war, and you want everyone else to stop expressing anger because it hurts you? So you keep telling them it's pointless - which it is, but when have people ever been daunted by pointlessness? Have you even read The Myth of Sysiphus? Anyway more power to your cynicism, you're a few years ahead of me I think.
 
Your powers of prognostication will have done you proud I'm sure. I think you just don't like people expressing anger about war, or a war, but I wonder, is that just because you're tired of feeling angry about war or a war, and you want everyone else to stop expressing anger because it hurts you? So you keep telling them it's pointless - which it is, but when have people ever been daunted by pointlessness? Have you even read The Myth of Sysiphus? Anyway more power to your cynicism, you're a few years ahead of me I think.
Be as angry as you like. It makes no difference to what I've said.
 
Anyway, back to kissing our arses goodbye...


This is the most interesting passage: 'Last week, Mikhail Kovalchuk, a close associate of Putin and head of the Kurchatov Institute research centre, said Russia could carry out a nuclear test “at least once” at Novaya Zemlya, an Arctic archipelago where the Soviet Union carried out testing.

Satellite images of Novaya Zemlya, published last month by the Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey, showed recent construction activity at the old test site.

The institute also found signs of activities at the old US testing ground in the Nevada desert, and the Chinese site in Xinjiang province, suggesting the CTBT is increasingly fragile as international tensions rise, and the nuclear powers expand or modernise their arsenals.'



 
Rifts on the Ukrainian side...

Zelenskiy's office rebukes top military commander for saying war at 'stalemate', saying it helped Russia and stirred 'panic'​

A rift has emerged in Ukraine’s leadership, the New York Times is reporting, with President Volodymyr Zelenskiy’s office on Saturday chastising Ukraine’s top military commander, Valerii Zaluzhnyi.

Gen Zaluzhnyi said in the Economist that the war was at a stalemate – with Zelenskiy’s office saying the comments could help Russia.

More from the Times here:

It was a striking public rebuke that signaled an emerging rift between the military and civilian leadership at an already challenging time for Ukraine.
Speaking on national television, a deputy head of the office of the president, Ihor Zhovkva, said Gen. Valerii Zaluzhnyi’s assertion that the fight against Russia was deadlocked “eases the work of the aggressor,” adding that the comments stirred “panic” among Ukraine’s Western allies.
At the same time, Mr. Zelensky disputed the general’s characterization of the fighting. “Time has passed, people are tired, regardless of their status, and this is understandable,” he said at a news conference on Saturday, adding: “But this is not a stalemate, I emphasize this once again.”
The public censure of General Zaluzhnyi came a day after the president’s office replaced one of his deputies, the head of special operations forces, who after his firing said he had been blindsided by the dismissal. It was unclear whether General Zaluzhnyi, the overall commander of Ukraine’s forces, knew in advance of the planned dismissal.
The emerging fissure between the general and the president comes as Ukraine is struggling in its war effort, militarily and diplomatically. Its operations along the roughly 600-mile-long trench line have failed to produce any advances, while resulting in high casualties on both sides, and Ukraine is facing intensified Russian attacks in the East.
At the same time, skepticism about Ukraine aid has increased in some European capitals and among members of the Republican Party in the United States.
 
Apparently rifts among the puppet masters as well.


Ukraine President Vladimir Zelenskiy said the war in Gaza is distracting focus from the war against Russia.

“The war in the Middle East, this conflict takes away the focus,” Zelenskiy said on Saturday.

The focus of humanitarian, diplomatic and media attention recently has shifted to the Israeli bombardment and troop advances in Gaza – leading to almost 9,500 casualties according to the Hamas-run Gaza health ministry – after Hamas’s 7 October rampage in Israel killed about 1,400 people.

Zelenskiy’s comments come amid emerging scepticism about long-term funding for Ukraine’s war effort in some European countries and from Republicans in the US. Ukraine’s counteroffensive failed to change the picture of the war and some lawmakers worry the conflict is at a stalemate. On Saturday, NBC reported, citing an unnamed US official, that western leaders including US and EU officials have discussed possible Ukraine-Russia peace negotiations.

But while visiting Kyiv, on Saturday European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen said the EU will stand by Ukraine “for as long as it takes”.
 
Zelensky will be soaking up the sun on Miami Beach within a month. He never gave a tinker's cuss for Ukraine, his usefulness to NATO is at an end, and he must be wishing he was still playing piano with his penis. Tbf he was quite good at that.
 
was broadcast around that time I was born ..

you poor fuckers who would of been old enough to comprehend that bleak piece of shit when it first came on


not seen a horror movie which would scare you more .. watched it 38 year later at the start of Ukraine invasion that was a bloody mistake..
 
was broadcast around that time I was born ..

you poor fuckers who would of been old enough to comprehend that bleak piece of shit when it first came on


not seen a horror movie which would scare you more .. watched it 38 year later at the start of Ukraine invasion that was a bloody mistake..
Why? I thought the consensus among the Ukraine/NATO cheerleaders on here was that the Russian nuclear weapons probably don't work anyway?
 


'Global military expenditure has reached a record high of $2440bn (£1970bn) after the largest annual rise in government spending on arms in over a decade, according to a report.

The 6.8% increase between 2022 and 2023 was the steepest since 2009, pushing spending to the highest recorded by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (Sipri) in its 60-year history.


For the first time, analysts at the thinktank recorded a rise in military outlay in all five geographical regions: Africa, Europe, the Middle East, Asia and Oceania and the Americas.

Nan Tian, a senior researcher with Sipri’s military expenditure and arms production programme, warned of the heightened risk of an unintended conflagration as governments raced to arm. He said: “The unprecedented rise in military spending is a direct response to the global deterioration in peace and security.


"States are prioritising military strength, but they risk an action-reaction spiral in the increasingly volatile geopolitical and security landscape.” '
 
Wasn't one theory that part of the cause of WWI was that everyone had been in an arms race and so just wanted to use them?
 
From the Guardian.


In a worrying sign of how tensions are spreading, Russian military personnel have entered an air base in Niger that is hosting US troops, a senior US defence official told Reuters.

The move that follows a decision by Niger’s junta to expel US forces.

It puts US and Russian troops in close proximity at a time when the nations’ military and diplomatic rivalry is increasingly acrimonious over the conflict in Ukraine.

The military officers ruling the West African nation have told the US to withdraw its nearly 1,000 military personnel from the country, which, until a coup last year had been a key partner for Washington’s fight against insurgents who have killed thousands of people and displaced millions more.

A senior US defence official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Russian forces were not mingling with US troops but were using a separate hangar at Airbase 101, which is next to Diori Hamani international airport in Niamey, Niger’s capital.
 

Russia testing nuclear weapons in response to West possibly sending troops to Ukraine​

Russia’s tactical nuclear weapon drills are a response to statements from the West about sending troops to Ukraine, the Kremlin said on Monday.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov cited comments by the French President Emmanuel Macron on possibly sending soldiers to Ukraine, as well as statements from the British and US Senate representatives.

Military and other special services are verifying reports about deployment of France’s foreign legion in Ukraine, Peskov added.

Peskov also said a Financial Times report saying that Russia was preparing acts of sabotage across Europe was “not serious” and was “groundless”.

The FT said in a recent report that European intelligence agencies had warned their governments that Russia was plotting violent acts of sabotage across the continent as it committed to a course of permanent conflict with the west.
 
Back
Top Bottom