Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The end of cash?

Here's something I don't get; if banks are so keen to get people to go cashless, then why the fuck aren't they structuring their card charges in order to encourage it? Because as things currently stand, they're basically incentivising many smaller businesses to hold on to cash transactions.

It's why I'm not convinced that banks actually want to get rid of cash, at least not completely. Certainly any such desire is no greater than their desire to squeeze more money out of businesses in the shorter term.
In a word profit. Use a card, we get paid a fee and our profits grow.
 
I am yet to come across a business that doesn't take cash, I think it should be illegal to refuse legal tender.
They may take cash from regulars tbf , my local pub in Hackney is card only but they probably would take cash from me & I know they do for a few of the regulars.
 
In a word profit. Use a card, we get paid a fee and our profits grow.

Right. So they are more interested in making money than in pushing everyone to go cashless. If the evil globalists really wanted to get rid of cash, then they'd lean on the card providers to change their way of doing business to make accepting cards more attractive than handling cash, even for smaller businesses.
 
So why are business choosing to go card only?

I wonder how many of those businesses are on the larger side. I suspect that there is an inverse relationship when it comes to the costs incurred by cash handling. Larger organisations will have to have staff trained and vetted for the task, while smaller operations can get away with the owner doing all of the work of carrying the cash to the bank.
 
I had to give a colleague some money today, they don't have a credit card machine so I gave them cash.

No worries. :)

:(
 
But banks charge for handling cash too.

Yes, but correct me if I'm wrong, the way the charges are structured means that it is cheaper on a per-transaction for smaller businesses to handle cash rather than accept card payments.
 
I am yet to come across a business that doesn't take cash, I think it should be illegal to refuse legal tender.

No.

That’s not the definition of legal tender. Nobody has to take any type of offered payment for anything. Legal tender is all about what you have to accept to settle an already existing legal debt, not what you have to accept for a new transaction.

Shops are under no obligation at all to accept cash payment. The idea of that has derived from a fundamental misunderstanding of what “legal tender” means. You are obliged to accept cash as payment for a debt, but you are not obliged to let the debt come into being in the first place.

It is and should remain up to you what you’re willing to accept as the terms of your trade.
 
It’s worth remembering that only 4% of GBP is held in the form of cash. 96% is just in the form of a recording on some ledger somewhere. I suspect that this underlies the reason for the popularity of non-cash payments amongst banks, businesses and consumers alike. It makes that 96% directly accessible without having some barrier between the money and the transaction.
 
I wonder how many of those businesses are on the larger side. I suspect that there is an inverse relationship when it comes to the costs incurred by cash handling. Larger organisations will have to have staff trained and vetted for the task, while smaller operations can get away with the owner doing all of the work of carrying the cash to the bank.
In my experience it is mostly smaller business that are going card only. I think this is due to the extra logistics needed for cash and it just is not worth it for a very small number of customers who can only pay in cash.

But then It is also small business that I see to be cash only. I would guess it depends on ther individual customer base which side they fall on.

Most just do both anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chz
No.





It is and should remain up to you what you’re willing to accept as the terms of your trade.
I get really uncomfortable with the idea that anyone should be forced to do something just because someone is willing to pay them.
 
Banks are certainly not lovely fluffy kittens, but going cashless (or reducing the % of cash payments) is not necessarily an attempt by the banks to squeeze more money.

Cash handling in a business is anything but "free". Hence why that boomer post about paying with a banknote and it going through loads of businesses and still holding its value is bollix.
 
In my experience it is mostly smaller business that are going card only. I think this is due to the extra logistics needed for cash and it just is not worth it for a very small number of customers who can only pay in cash.

But then It is also small business that I see to be cash only. I would guess it depends on ther individual customer base which side they fall on.

Most just do both anyway.
This was a few years ago and may have been complicated by their charity status, but when I worked for a cash-only small business the manager said something about the different options for opening a bank account would either let them take cash or card payments without extortionate charges, but not both.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chz
I'll pay for my pint in 1 & 2p's then?

Maximum payment in coppers is £1.

It's actually just 20p.

There are also some restrictions when using small coins. For example, 1p and 2p coins only count as legal tender for any amount up to 20p.

 
Back
Top Bottom