Tropi
Well-Known Member
The children of Windrush: 'I’m here legally, but they’re asking me to prove I’m British'
This is so appalling!
This is so appalling!
Racist policy in racist outcomes shocker.
Concerned there's a narrative of good immigrant (Windrush invitees) and bad immigrant (everyone else) being allowed to develop around this. The Windrush accidental deportees are just the most glaring outrage of an outrageously racist policy - they are the tip of the iceberg. We need to make sure the argument is widened out at all opportunity.
This June 22nd marks the 70th anniversary of the arrival of the HMS Empire Windrush to the Port of Tilbury.
The ship brought 492 passengers from Jamaica to the UK, many of whom were ex-servicemen who had fought for Britain in the Second World War, and all were in fact British subjects, rather than ‘migrants’, and as such came with full citizenship rights. It is often forgotten that those who lived under British colonialism only became subject to immigration controls in the UK after 1962.
The Windrush heralded the ‘irresistible rise of multiracial Britain’ and with it sparked debate and discussion about immigration, Britishness and ‘race relations’. The arrival of just a few hundred ‘coloured immigrants’ from the New Commonwealth sparked widespread consternation, despite the fact that many more ‘white’ migrants were arriving during this period. Concerns about ‘coloured immigration’ ultimately led to the implementation and hardening of border controls on those coming from the former colonies, and to the introduction of a descent-based (racial) model of citizenship. In fact, the racialised character of British immigration continues to influence who can move and who can stay in the country, and on what terms.
With this historic moment in mind, Consented brings you Rethinking Windrush, where, over two panel discussions, we will reflect not just on the significance of the Windrush in 1948, but on the legacies of the Windrush today, using the anniversary as an opportunity to discuss race, citizenship and immigration control in Britain, seventy years after the ship’s historic arrival.
Speakers TBA shortly.
This event will take place on the 17th June from 1.00 pm at Birkbeck’s Malet Street campus in room B34.
Kenan Malik recently:Concerned there's a narrative of good immigrant (Windrush invitees) and bad immigrant (everyone else) being allowed to develop around this. The Windrush accidental deportees are just the most glaring outrage of an outrageously racist policy - they are the tip of the iceberg. We need to make sure the argument is widened out at all opportunity.
Yes.Is it just a game for these people?
this isn't the home office coming up with an evil plan its unthinking fuckwits being fuckwits and refusing to back down when called on their fuckwittedness.
technically these people are illegal immigrants .
I was last aware of Johnson after he gave a sweet job in the DoE to his mate, the bigot Toby Young. Their dinner parties must be revolting.Yes.
Kenan Malik recently:
"In demonising a figure such as Hopkins, we often give a free pass to politicians and institutions that are far more influential in promoting reactionary ideas, both in policy and in shaping public opinion.
Consider one of her most infamous columns for the Sun, in which she described immigrants as ‘cockroaches’ and called for gunboats to ‘drive them back to their shores’. It was an obnoxious, hate-filled piece that drew a torrent of outrage.
Yet I am always struck by how silent liberals are when it comes to the actual use by European nations of gunboats against refugees and the attempt to wall off Europe by paying millions to the most unsavoury regimes from Turkey to Eritrea to Libya to lock up would-be immigrants in hell-hole detention centres just out of sight of Brussels, Paris and London.
If half the energy expended on denouncing Hopkins had been used to challenge European migration policy, migrants might be in a better place now. But, then, to have done so would not have satisfied the demand for cheap outrage." (My emphasis).
ON THE ASSASSINATION OF KATIE HOPKINS