Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

*The Archers thread

The critical period when the opinion of the jury went from largely guilty to 10-1 against was not heard. I don't know how they changed their minds so much.
Three would never go Guilty, and it seemed to be five all, before each other juror's prejudices were exposed, and their hypocrisy thrown back in their face to, presumably, make them crumble - exactly as in 12 angry Men. I did quite like the fact that it seems to have been Nigel who was the one who stayed Utter Bastard
 
Three would never go Guilty, and it seemed to be five all, before each other juror's prejudices were exposed, and their hypocrisy thrown back in their face to, presumably, make them crumble - exactly as in 12 angry Men. I did quite like the fact that it seems to have been Nigel who was the one who stayed Utter Bastard
Perhaps Helen was on the roof as well and prised Nigel's fingers off the ledge after David pushed him over? That would explain a lot.
 
Would Nigel Havers have been allowed to serve if his wife had made such (vague) allegations about him? Allegations seemingly upheld in a court.
 
Fucking abysmal.

Goes to show that years upon years of acting in familiar, well-known roles really does have an effect.

This was like a shamateur mishmash of arbitrary bollocks, over-voiced by individual non-archers-entities who were keen to take home the "Loudest Rendition of Individual Lines" trophy, 2016.
 
That's because it was based on the script of a 1950s film, I guess
The thing about a successful homage is that it doesn't rely on a dysfunctional understanding of a script from 60 years ago in order to work.

I've got 12 Angry Men somewhere.

I've watched it a couple of times.

Half way through tonight, I commented to my wife - oh, sounds a lot like they're taking off 12 angry men.

That doesn't mitigate the point that tonight was fucking shit. The acting was abysmal. The "all star cast" were a wet sack of shit, rubbed on the corpse of a month-old dead summer badger, and dunked in rancid cat puke. The script was fucking dire.

Total waste of 45 minutes of my life. Jury deliberations added nothing but exponentially spiralling levels of irritation and annoyance, over and above what the bog standard archers cast were able to deliver.
 
...That doesn't mitigate the point that tonight was fucking shit. The acting was abysmal. The "all star cast" were a wet sack of shit, rubbed on the corpse of a month-old dead summer badger, and dunked in rancid cat puke. The script was fucking dire.

Total waste of 45 minutes of my life. Jury deliberations added nothing but exponentially spiralling levels of irritation and annoyance, over and above what the bog standard archers cast were able to deliver.
So, did you like it or not?
 
Yes, unless the defence barrister knew about it, when she could have challenged him on selection.
Should have come up in a pre trial questionnaire, iirr. If he didn't mention it he should be in trouble. If he did n she ignored it, she's a fool!
 
As regular listeners might know (er... I mean listeners to the rubbish I post on here) I'm holidaying in 1950s Britain where the internet doesn't exist. So was only able to listen after a trip to a pub with WiFi where I could download, retire to Butlin's chalet and then listen.

To say it was fucking awful would be to undermine the once-shocking nature of the word "fucking".

It's fucking awfulness could be cameo'd by Pat's dialogue after the two not guilty verdicts ... and feel free to add layers of ridiculous overacting ... "Oh Tony! I don't know what it means".

:mad:
 
Back
Top Bottom