Perhaps someone googled iPlayer on their mobile in the jury room and listened to a few recent omnibus editions. No other way it could have happened.The critical period when the opinion of the jury went from largely guilty to 10-1 against was not heard. I don't know how they changed their minds so much.
I didn't recognise Havers' voice, nor Tate's ... Only realised afterwards.
Three would never go Guilty, and it seemed to be five all, before each other juror's prejudices were exposed, and their hypocrisy thrown back in their face to, presumably, make them crumble - exactly as in 12 angry Men. I did quite like the fact that it seems to have been Nigel who was the one who stayed Utter BastardThe critical period when the opinion of the jury went from largely guilty to 10-1 against was not heard. I don't know how they changed their minds so much.
Perhaps Helen was on the roof as well and prised Nigel's fingers off the ledge after David pushed him over? That would explain a lot.Three would never go Guilty, and it seemed to be five all, before each other juror's prejudices were exposed, and their hypocrisy thrown back in their face to, presumably, make them crumble - exactly as in 12 angry Men. I did quite like the fact that it seems to have been Nigel who was the one who stayed Utter Bastard
Yes, unless the defence barrister knew about it, when she could have challenged him on selection.Would Nigel Havers have been allowed to serve if his wife had made such (vague) allegations about him? Allegations seemingly upheld in a court.
That's because it was based on the script of a 1950s film, I guessIt felt like a dramatised instruction on How Juries Work from a 1950s educational film.
The thing about a successful homage is that it doesn't rely on a dysfunctional understanding of a script from 60 years ago in order to work.That's because it was based on the script of a 1950s film, I guess
So, did you like it or not?...That doesn't mitigate the point that tonight was fucking shit. The acting was abysmal. The "all star cast" were a wet sack of shit, rubbed on the corpse of a month-old dead summer badger, and dunked in rancid cat puke. The script was fucking dire.
Total waste of 45 minutes of my life. Jury deliberations added nothing but exponentially spiralling levels of irritation and annoyance, over and above what the bog standard archers cast were able to deliver.
Should have come up in a pre trial questionnaire, iirr. If he didn't mention it he should be in trouble. If he did n she ignored it, she's a fool!Yes, unless the defence barrister knew about it, when she could have challenged him on selection.
I don't remember being given a pre trial questionnaireShould have come up in a pre trial questionnaire, iirr. If he didn't mention it he should be in trouble. If he did n she ignored it, she's a fool!
Must be a new thing. Not a bad idea though.I don't remember being given a pre trial questionnaire
What did you think about the gun fight?listened to half of this this morning en route to work. glad i tuned in here and now know so i don't have to listen to the rest. what a load of utter fucking tosh that was with the jury
What did you think about the gun fight?
Actually it's done via a dbs check now, my mistake.I don't remember being given a pre trial questionnaire
God, I hate Catherine Tate - she only ever plays the same character.I knew Catherine Tate's voice but really couldn't place it, it was quite distracting.