Spymaster
Plastic Paddy
... you might try to avoid looking like a clewless tosspot wanker.
I might even try to spell correctly.
... you might try to avoid looking like a clewless tosspot wanker.
make shorterBriefen?
everyone can spell 'correctly'. set your sights higher.I might even try to spell correctly.
make shorter
Spymaster Pickman's model
Just have a gander at yersels,
Nothing more to add,other than a disappointment that two otherwise decent posters could bring their personal beefs onto this thread.
Sorry, not getting into it, plenty of other threads where you can tear each other a new arsehole, stuff like this demands a certain level of respect as to the issues under discussion, sorry if I sound like a 'stuffed shirt'Sorry. But I can't help it, Coley. The geezer's a fucking bellend.
Calling brown people 'savages'?
Haven't read the thread but fucking surprised if it's only pickman's tearing someone a new arsehole over it.
Sorry, not getting into it, plenty of other threads where you can tear each other a new arsehole, stuff like this demands a certain level of respect as to the issues under discussion, sorry if I sound like a 'stuffed shirt'
But even on here, mebbes certain levels of respect should be observed?
Cannabilism has nowt to do with skin colour.Do they have bones through their noses and cook white men in cauldrons?
i'll say one thing for lemon eddy, he was appalled by yesterday's attack. but where he's a master debater...
Calling brown people 'savages'?
Haven't read the thread but fucking surprised if it's only pickman's tearing someone a new arsehole over it.
i don't think anyone but you is saying god told them to do.it. god did of course play a part in gwb's decision-making processIts not brown people in general its people who shoot up a school are fucking savages because god told them to do it and I stand by it
oh dear. you can spell correctly but you don't have a clew about rarer words.It's all about punctuation. You "clewless" penis.
With reference to certain actions?
Of course.
Unspeakably savage bastards.
something i am sure you've often seen while swigging from your bottle of meths.It's like watching a pair of incontinent dossers having an argument about who's trousers are most piss-soaked.
Well done. You're reacting exactly in the way that they (be it the state of Israel, IS or TTP) want you to. They don't want you asking difficult questions like "why?", they prefer you calling them names and not thinking beyond that.
As for "unspeakably savage", I've absolutely no doubt you've spoken about how unspeakably savage they are, so cut the hyperbole, hmm?
there doesn't seem to have been much thinking about the root causes and contexts by many of the people insistent on calling the perpetrators savages on this thread. so while not impossible to combine the two the combined response not universally in evidence here.Surely it's possible to have a visceral response to an act of savagery by calling it as such while at the same time thinking more deeply about the root causes and context? One need not preclude the other.
Maybe we should start a separate thread about appropriate massacre terminology, anyway. It's badly stinking up this one at the same time as the bodies of a bunch of innocents are still fresh in the ground.
Cannabilism has nowt to do with skin colour.
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/europes-hypocritical-history-of-cannibalism-42642371/
there doesn't seem to have been much thinking about the root causes and contexts by many of the people insistent on calling the perpetrators savages on this thread. so while not impossible to combine the two the combined response not universally in evidence here.
if i'd wanted an example of the sort of simplistick thought going on i couldn't have asked for a better example than your ready contribution. thank you.The perpetrators shot, beheaded and set people on fire. Most of the dead are just kids. It's an act of savagery, no mistake about it. Root causes and all.
no shish?I can never read anything about the Donner party without asking myself "did they make each other into kebabs?".
something i am sure you've often seen while swigging from your bottle of meths.
perhaps if you unbefuddle your mind for a moment, you'll see spymaster joining the thread rather late and having a confused go at me. given your own predilection for leaving no post unanswered i would have thought you'd know why what happened happened.
what would you do, when someone like spymaster turns up as he did? i doubt you'd ignore him and if you've any suggestions of a better course of action i'd be pleased to hear them.My comment is about the unedifying spectacle the pair of you are making of yourselves with this childish point-scoring.
if i'd wanted an example of the sort of simplistick thought going on i couldn't have asked for a better example than your ready contribution. thank you.
as it is, it is utterly meaningless removed from what went before and what will come after.