What the fuck are you mumbling about now? He has admitted in the past AND on this thread to reading the Sun and has also quoted from it, he only started backtracking when pulled on it for accusing someone else of believing what they read in papersYeah, cos you really stick to the facts don't you?
They could well have made it up, yeah. I don't have your faith in journalistic integrity.
Ah, thanks for the clarification. Anyway, if you are right Henry Winter and the Telegraph are going to be facing a chilly start to the New Year, massive lawsuit heading their way from Liverpool FC and all that. They must be going fucking mental that journalists have made this story up.
Can you show me where on this thread SK has admitted to reading the sun, please?
I think he's clever enough to have it written as speculation.
Go and search.
I'm not losing any sleep over it, I find people - especially non-Liverpool supporters having a go at me for it a bit pathetic tbh.
Eh? That's where he admits to posting a link from the Sun, not reading the paper. And don't try and wriggle out of it by saying they are the same thing.
He posted a link to an article and admits to reading it, but is not a Sun reader?
Haven't had time to read the report in full, but I don't think he has admitted to making the remark repeatedly. And he hasn't admitted that it was racist either.
I can tell the difference between a looking at a website and buying a paper - It appears you can't.
This is where the dispute is, at least as to the intent, he has admitted saying it and in the context of when it was said it can only reasonably be taken as racist, as I am getting sick of repeating, you would not refer to a black man during a heated argument as "little black boy" unless you intended to cause maximum offence.
You can't even tell the difference between the words buying and reading.
What if it doesn't cause offence, where you come from?. Evra kicked off the exchange with a spanish/south american insult - but you then want to take an english view on that word??
If Evra should be charged as well then that is another matter, it does not make Suarez less guilty. If I am called a plastic paddy does that make it ok to call the person a nigger?
Where did he get called a nigger?
Not according to evra he didn't. And the case hinges on the fact that suarez's evidence was found not to be credible. I've only skim read it but the judgement seems a fair one to me. If nothing else this is a lesson to suarez not to try to bullshit a tribunal which is what he appears to have tried to do. Makes liverpool club's reaction look extremely foolish too.
