the latest socialist worker article here -
http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/article.php?article_id=9615
http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/article.php?article_id=9615
nwnm said:the latest socialist worker article here -
http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/article.php?article_id=9615
Tommy Sheridan spoke towards the end of the meeting.....
The opening of his speech seemed a little downbeat compared to the mood of the meeting.
He said, “We may collectively as socialists never realise our dream....
...
Dave Sherry, from the southside of Glasgow, said
...
“I was a little disappointed not to have heard Tommy Sheridan spell out more about what we need to do over the next few months.”
there were also members of the SSP there to see how things developed, the press and (ahem) quite a number of people with english accents not previously sighted on the left scene in scotland.
ncidentally there had been rumours flying round that Respect were bringing people up from England. I'm 98% sure that was not true and did not happen. I looked for it and could not see it.
treelover said:ah, now i see, why am I not surprised..
May 1st 2003 saw six SSP members elected to the Scottish Parliament. They will join Tommy Sheridan in fighting for the interests of working class people in Scotland and giving a voice for the struggles that are taking place in the workplaces and communities around the country.
Alan G said:Having checked the only one I can see with that figure was the herald which on second glance says a weekend tally of 900 - for both rallys. I was sure one had claimed 900 but given the number of articles Ive read over the past few days it might have been in another or I may have just mixed it up.
She went on to sayFullyplumped said:Nice bits from the SSP event...
Carolyn Leckie, MSP for Central Scotland, opened by observing that she had nowhere to park her broomstick - a reference to Tommy Sheridan’s attack on the “witches” in the party in the weeks after his resignation in 2004. .
She did not continue by sayingTommy Sheridan had participated in sexual activity where a profit was made, he had lied, he had cast women as gold-diggers and mentally ill, he had cross-examined women with whom he had had sexual relations about their sexual history and then accused them of lying. This behaviour was not socialism.
I'm a fucking moralising fruitcake, and exactly why I am saying what has been decided by a jury to be false has no bearing, except of course for cheap political points
Fisher_Gate said:In England, SWP are already purging ISG members from being delegates
I did a quick estimate.<of the SSP rally>There were two aisles of 9seats each. There were 28rows. More chairs were then brought in an people were still standing at the back. That means 504 seats then more brought in and people standing. So 400low end as there were a few seats around empty when I did a count. 500 more accurate said:Judging by your estimate you are on crack - 504 seats + more brought in and people standing. 400 is the low end of your estimate? if there were 504 seats <+more brought in> and people standing<why?> there would be more than a few empty seats wouldn't there? And the SSP are now claiming 400 btw - not that I'm questioning your/their 'integrity' or anything....
nwnm said:Judging by your estimate you are on crack - 504 seats + more brought in and people standing. 400 is the low end of your estimate? if there were 504 seats <+more brought in> and people standing<why?> there would be more than a few empty seats wouldn't there? And the SSP are now claiming 400 btw - not that I'm questioning your/their 'integrity' or anything....
nwnm said:but your original figure was 500.
mutley said:I think you two have done this to death..
Both meetings had a few 100, but the Solidarity one was a bit bigger. Agreed?
JimPage said:pleasing to see some SWP members up here sticking with the SSP as well
JHE said:I suppose they would be expelled, if they existed. Jim has provided no evidence that there are any such Social Workers.
small numbers maybe, i know 2 who arent leaving and maybe some more out there. not all SWPers are happy with their leaderships decision
They're definitely going with Sheridan. How not? Sheridan's soLIdARity has the endorsement of the Social Workers' masters in the MAB.
JimPage said:MAB arent endorsing Solidarity as far as i know. i dont think solidarity are stupid enough to try to split the working class vote on racial grounds as respect have in england
JimPage said:MAB arent endorsing Solidarity as far as i know. i dont think solidarity are stupid enough to try to split the working class vote on racial grounds as respect have in england
niclas said:Will the SWPers who stick with the SSP get kicked out of the SWP?
Fullyplumped said:What a wonderful example of rising above it all. The Daily Record sub-editor missed a trick with the headline, though - it could have been The Liar, The Witch and the Warzone.
exosculate said:I thought the working class vote in England was generally speaking split between Labour, Liberal and Tory?
With a fair bit of abstention to be fair