Looks good, but what's it play like? The few Fender acoustics I've tried struck me as mediocre, if not poor.
It plays real nice and easy in my hands , its mainly that for out and out sound quality theres better than the Fenders even the good old ones I agree and I too would usually skip Fenders for quality accoustics but lots of companies I think produces some classic stuff that for some reason sounds much better too as they age and with experimenting with setups / strings etc.
I had a great Welsh made Merlin Accoustic guitar thats been passed along family now that also played and sounded fantastic but Merlin made crap electrics that fell apart and got reviewed as such so the decent acoustics they made were short lived too , that one too wont leave the family.
Best acoustic Ive ever played and always been out of my price range when I find one and very rare now are the 70s Aria Paul Brett models , stunning guitars in my opinion , you know you are holding something special if you come across one of those but pretty rare now and most accoustics they have made since have never matched those , why do they stop making stuff like that
.
Ive got a real nice jack of all trades Ibanez too that was nice out the box but nothing Ive ever picked up plays as nice for me as the newporter can spend hours on it and no aches.
This Fender was different and Id played one before seeking my own out due to getting lots of cramp in hands at time , these have a real easy neck unlike the other models but I dont have banana fingers .
Soundwise it has a great blues tone , for licks and bendy sustains stuff or arpeggios /finger plucking not really a full on just hard strum sound its just ... nice for hammering on and vibratos stuff like that really stand out
I think The new Fenders accoustics are poor too and most the accoustics were imo but the Mahogany Newporters have aged really well in my opinion but its mainly about the feel they are the only accoustic Ive come across with a neck that makes it really comfortable for me to come straight on to after the electric due to the neck that they have .
mine is very picky on strings too light and it sounds silly , it took a while for it to sound great but always played fantastic very fast neck for leads with an action most acoustics wouldn't get close too without losing all the tone my nephew whos into heavy metal type shredding can even do that lightening fast on it .
But people didnt buy em so Later Newporter reissues were all veneer and ply cheaper and nastier anyway I think
mine sounds better than this guys though his sounds more tinny than mine but that could be his webcam mic or may have the one with a bolt on neck or dead strings , they have great sustain usually for lead work , as mad as that sounds some of the early Newporters have bolt on strat necks and they seem to lose some of the deep "jazziness" mine has the strat neck but its fixed , Strange talking about bolt on and fixed necks about acoustics but yeah Fender were always quirky with acoustics and some had bolt on necks like the cheap Ekos had , Fender they used the necks from the telecaster and stratocaster production lines on the Newporters and Malibus hence why they feel like an electric to play.
Going by the comments on this video some there have also noticed that Fender kept messing with the Newporter and Malibu range.
Youve probably noticed Im a bit attached to mine and geeky about them , not something I can say about most of my purchases that have come and gone.
Interesting idea for a thread though right up my street