Thats no doubt what he meant though, or atleast those are probably the ramifications of what he's supporting.David Lammy didn't say that tradespersons carrying tools and equipment should use the tube, did he?
Last edited:
Thats no doubt what he meant though, or atleast those are probably the ramifications of what he's supporting.David Lammy didn't say that tradespersons carrying tools and equipment should use the tube, did he?
The kids that die from pollution are the working class ones you know. Or do they not count because they can't carry a hod yet?Thats no doubt what he meant though, or atleast those are probably the ramifications of what he's supporting.
The kids that die from pollution are the working class ones you know. Or do they not count because they can't carry a hod yet?
The ones with their own vans are mostly petit bourgeois small business owners.
Those kids are dying from pollution in general, not particularly due to tradesmen carting their stuff around. We could do much more to reduce overall pollution by improving mass transit, instead of just having dogshit politicians wagging their fingers at people who actually work for a living
My window cleaning cousin in Edinburgh manages on a bicycle. Most window cleaners have very local routes, the guy who does mine doesn't even have a bike. Does he employ anyone? Either way he owns the means of production so yes, he's not a member of the working class unless you're identifying working class by superficial attributes rather than economic reality.Worra load of bollocks. One of my friends is a self-employed window cleaner and had his own van. It was second-hand and shitty, but he could just about afford it. Does having your own van make one p-bourgeois now?
The congestion charge literally reduces child asthma rates. Go look at the hospital admission rates for Kensington and Chelsea where the rich have been benefitting from it for years. In addition the money goes into public transport. Its redistributive.
My window cleaning cousin in Edinburgh manages on a bicycle. Most window cleaners have very local routes, the guy who does mine doesn't even have a bike. Does he employ anyone? Either way he owns the means of production so yes, he's not a member of the working class unless you're identifying working class by superficial attributes rather than economic reality.
It's in answer to the claim that the congestion charge is mainly a working class problem. Most working class people who work in the current and future cc zones travel to work by public transport. Most of the rest are driving company vehicles and are unaffected as the company will pay cc.Sure, but the congestion charge applies to a wide variety of road users, does it not?
More than a century ago the london county council had cheaper fares on public transport for workers. Be nice to see that brought back.
We need some of our scum GL politicians to find the political imagination and will to make public transport free at the point of delivery. Basically, only £5bn needs to be skimmed from the trillions flowing through the City to tax havens to make up the fares component of the TfL budget. Then we could really be Luxembourg-on-Thames.
AFAIR the 'Fair's Fares' scheme was about fare reductions through significant subsidy, rather than actual free transport for the majority. But yeah, it was the very scummy LB of Bromley that initiated the legal challenges that finally undid Livingstone's policy.Livingstone tried to bring in free transport about 40 years ago. Some scummy Tory run council, challenged it in the courts, and won.
He’s petite bourgeois.There's no boss exploiting his labour. Is everyone who doesn't have the resources to live independently now working class?
There's an echo in here.He’s petite bourgeois.
I skim-read the thread, so probably.There's an echo in here.
Genuinely not sure about the classic definition tbhThere's no boss exploiting his labour. Is everyone who doesn't have the resources to live independently now working class?
Well, the window cleaner was the example my dad used when it was drummed into me as a child.Genuinely not sure about the classic definition tbh
Working class is wider than proletariat, normally. That why sickles are included with the hammers.Genuinely not sure about the classic definition tbh
Is that not the peasantry in some other unorthodox formulation?Working class is wider than proletariat, normally. That why sickles are included with the hammers.
It is the peasantry, but it’s only unorthodox if they’re claimed as proletarian.Is that not the peasantry in some other unorthodox formulation?
Top debating skillz on show there.Thats no doubt what he meant though...
They will grow up to be capitalists so deserve to be wheezy...The kids that die from pollution are the working class ones you know. Or do they not count because they can't carry a hod yet?
Labour is part of capital.They will grow up to be capitalists so deserve to be wheezy...
To secure for theLabour is part of capital.
Is he the one who was wanked off into a champagne glass?