You'll love this one. It's a corker ...
http://www.returnofkings.com/78898/9-secrets-about-female-nature-told-by-a-hot-girl-dying-of-cancer
Number four is true. The headline at least. Not sure about the dogs.
You'll love this one. It's a corker ...
http://www.returnofkings.com/78898/9-secrets-about-female-nature-told-by-a-hot-girl-dying-of-cancer
returning unwillingly to your solution to misogyny...Number four is true. The headline at least. Not sure about the dogs.
The dogs act like alphas
he must be completely baffled as to how come those tiny little pecinese lapdog type things are so popular.
You think the article's bad, you should see some of the comments. Like this gem...
"Wi Tu Lo A.V. Yader • a day ago
Hot women are not fucking their dogs. But the 6's and below are fucking their dogs. Just go to a dog park in Seattle. You'll see mostly frumpy women, 35 and over, with male dogs. The dogs act like alphas, not like pets. The dogs are over-sexed, running around humping on anything and everything. Watch long enough and you'll see those dogs hump on their female "owner." You can be sure that when they get home, that dog will be humping and she will be on her hands and knees moaning.
Consider this: This woman is alone night after night. The dog is horny 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. Do you really think that frumpy, desperate woman is not going to test out getting fucked by that dog?
It's sad but it's just the way these women have been raised in a corrupted culture. Their minds are all twisted around. They are miserable and on psychotropic drugs. Their hearts are empty. All they know is that they want dick. Their minds are so fucked that they don't different between human and dog dick."
do tellPretty much.
I have to go away for a bit now. But if I can be bothered, I will return later to explain how I think misogyny can be eliminated altogether.
phildwyer's gone all brave sir robin. again.
we are lucky we will not hear his bollocks on the subject.
returning unwillingly to your solution to misogyny...
do tell
No doubt you're busy with more important things but that's just mean, isn't it, suggesting that you've got The Answer but just can't be arsed to share it.Will you stop pestering me please?
No doubt you're busy with more important things but that's just mean, isn't it, suggesting that you've got The Answer but just can't be arsed to share it.
we've known for years you're an answer short of a quizI suppose it is a bit mean. But Pickers loves it.
More projection than an IMAX theatre!You think the article's bad, you should see some of the comments. Like this gem...
"Wi Tu Lo A.V. Yader • a day ago
Hot women are not fucking their dogs. But the 6's and below are fucking their dogs. Just go to a dog park in Seattle. You'll see mostly frumpy women, 35 and over, with male dogs. The dogs act like alphas, not like pets. The dogs are over-sexed, running around humping on anything and everything. Watch long enough and you'll see those dogs hump on their female "owner." You can be sure that when they get home, that dog will be humping and she will be on her hands and knees moaning.
Consider this: This woman is alone night after night. The dog is horny 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. Do you really think that frumpy, desperate woman is not going to test out getting fucked by that dog?
It's sad but it's just the way these women have been raised in a corrupted culture. Their minds are all twisted around. They are miserable and on psychotropic drugs. Their hearts are empty. All they know is that they want dick. Their minds are so fucked that they don't different between human and dog dick."
we've known for years you're an answer short of a quiz
View attachment 83313
yeh it's clearly *me* pestering *you* for answers you have promised when you see nothing wrong with pestering me about e.g. ac.
So, eastern misogyny is caused by a culture of fatherhood i.e. patriarchy, and western misogyny is casused by a culture of a lack of fatherhood. But eastern misogyny is better.
Pretty much.
I have to go away for a bit now. But if I can be bothered, I will return later to explain how I think misogyny can be eliminated altogether.
yes, it is pretty weird when someone starts asking questions more than ten years after they first became aware of something. but share with us, o mighty prof, your secret means for the abolition of misogyny.I haven't pestered you at all. You're always banging on about your admiration for "the Beast" Crowley. You shouldn't be surprised when people pull you up on it. It's pretty weird, as you must admit.
but (sensible) answer came there none.But seriously, Phil, where are we with this? Do you really think that eastern and western misogyny have opposite casues, but that western misogyny is worse? And what can be done about either?
but (sensible) answer came there none.
But seriously, Phil, where are we with this? Do you really think that eastern and western misogyny have opposite casues, but that western misogyny is worse?
Nah.I do believe that postmodern misogyny--as incarnated by Roosh--is worse than traditional patriarchy. It's more clearly psychotic and delusional, and its more open in its hatred and contempt for women.
Merely 'modern' misogyny, in which a group of men go on the pull and refer to any conquest as 'it' is very much like Roosh's version. It is Roosh's version - there's nothing new here except the internet, which allows such men to display their ideas for the world to see.
The dichotomy is not between "western" and "eastern," but between "traditional" and "postmodern."
I do believe that postmodern misogyny--as incarnated by Roosh--is worse than traditional patriarchy. It's more clearly psychotic and delusional, and its more open in its hatred and contempt for women. Roosh is perfectly candid in his view of women as the enemy.
And in one of history's more pungent ironies, postmodern misogyny is made possible by the decline of traditional patriarchy. Not that traditional patriarchy is good, you understand, but it's preferable to its successor.
Oh I don't know, a spot of Malleus Maleficorum might be just the ticket.yeh cos an argument about periodisation and historical inaccuracy is what this thread really needs.
The Malleus MaleficarumOh I don't know, a spot of Malleus Maleficorum might be just the ticket.
A lot of truth in that. It's less 'men on the pull' and more like a rape-gang of conquering soldiers, only spread out on the internet rather than going from village to village.This is your fundamental mistake.
The men who follow Roosh are not the men who "pull" women. The men who follow Roosh are the men who do not "pull" women. They declare themselves the victims, rather than the beneficiaries, of C21st open hypergamy.
Never (and I do mean never) before have such men banded together into something that is beginning to resemble a movement. A bowel movement perhaps, but still a significant social phenomenon. We ignore it at our peril.
Women are basically far more valuable than men in biological/reproductive terms, like walking talking bars of gold they are... "what's that bar of gold? You want to run around out there in the world on your little golden legs making your own decisions in life do ya? Well we'll soon see about that... were's my strong-box!" <- Old skool mysogeny, versus "women are cum-dumpsters placed on Earth for my pleasure".
I think that's sort of what you're saying anyway, on the one hand the perceived need to control women and their fertility particular to property-orientated societies... versus a kind of consumerism-orientated approach (dominated by the male-coin) taken by spoilt man-brats like Roosh. Like lbj I doubt there's really a difference.
I think you just described the difference pretty accurately. Personally I'd put it like this:
Traditional Patriarch: women are delicate creatures in need of male guidance and protection.
Roosh: women are dirty sluts and filthy whores in need of a good fucking.
Neither is good. But the second is worst.