Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

RIP Sarah Everard, who went missing from Brixton in March 2021

The Met has admitted it didn't do the vetting properly before he transferred over, as they missed an indecent exposure incident linked to a vehicle registered to him.

They also said even if they had linked it, as he wasn't a named suspect, the outcome wouldn't have changed.

Which is just fucking brilliant.

Here's a thought, Metropolitan Police, maybe your vetting process and procedures aren't fit for purpose.
 
The WHO has this fact sheet: Violence against women

Amongst other things it mentions education for children and adults. "Norms on the acceptability of violence against women are a root cause of violence against women..Promising interventions include...school programmes that...include curricula that challenges gender stereotypes and promotes relationships based on equality and consent; and group-based participatory education with women and men to generate critical reflections about unequal gender power relationships." Does anyone know of education like this in the UK? There's probably a UN programme about it but I haven't found it yet.
There is the Good Lad initiative here in the UK works at uni level. But it's a drop in the ocean and receives nothing compared to the funds put into counter terrorism
 
There is the Good Lad initiative here in the UK works at uni level. But it's a drop in the ocean and receives nothing compared to the funds put into counter terrorism
And - while late is better than never - doing it at uni level is leaving it very late.

But then again, you only have to look at something like the back-to-school haircuts thread to realise what a complete Horlicks schools would make of this kind of training :hmm:
 
There's no night buses running near me in Glasgow. To be fair I'd flag down a black cab. If there was one.
why should bus drivers be expected to police the police anyway? imo any police force which says 'get a bus driver to assist you in dealing with us' should be disbanded and its staff dispersed to other jobs where they can do no harm to the public, feeding birds in the south shetlands for example
 
Sarah Everard: Challenge plain-clothes officers, Met Police says Sarah Everard: Challenge plain-clothes officers, Met Police says
In a letter to MPs, seen by the BBC, Scotland Yard admitted the case was part of a "much bigger and troubling picture".

The force advised people detained by a lone plain-clothes officer to ask "where are your colleagues" and "where have you come from?"

Here’s all their brilliant advice :facepalm:

ETA: My first ever contact with the Met was years ago when I was at a demo with my boyfriend and the Met were trying to get us off the road onto the pavement and my boyfriend got knocked back onto the road They arrested him. I had never been to London and didn’t know anyone else here. I was pleading with them to tell me where they were taking him and they told me to ‘shut up you slag or we’ll arrest you too’. Nothing much has changed since then has it?
 
Last edited:
She really needs to resign over this. Someone needs to tell her to go
I'm hoping that when the extent of the Whatsapp messages, the things that were said in police cars, the station, the allegations, the hundreds of sexual assaults that were reported and the probably thousands that were not, and the absolute culture is looked into, she'll get the sack. Bet she doesn't, though.
 
They absolutely knew, his colleagues nicknamed him 'The Rapist' remember, as a funny joke because they knew, knew that he hated women but hey whatever that's quite normal and no big deal.

That is what they need to look at, how that was 'ok'.
No easy answers obvs but it's definitely not a failure of paperwork its much bigger than that.
 
She really needs to resign over this. Someone needs to tell her to go

She's a disgrace. Unable to smell cannabis, apparently. But her comments when she ordered JCdM to be executed should have stopped her career dead in its tracks:

"I think about it quite often. I wish, wish, wish it hadn't happened, of course, but if anything it has made me a better leader, a better police officer and it has made me more resilient."


Killing him made her a better copper? And yeah, walking away with just a promotion and a damehood, can see why that's made her more resilient :rolleyes:
 
Dear women , we're sorry we have some rapists, misogynists and other assorted scumbags working for us. AKA baddons. If you think one of these may be trying to harm you on the pretext of Police work, please, erm... Shout at a bus or something. Or yes, challenge them for ID and ask about their authority. Thanks.
 
A woman in what is very, very evidently still very much a man's world.
Whilst I can't stand CD she is a woman in charge of men. Instead of being a safe pair of hands and facilitating the closing of ranks this time she needs to act. And act quickly and visibly.

Failure to do anything of meaning will make her incompetence outweigh her usefulness
 
The institution we look to to protect and serve us is staffed and managed by thick racist misogynists.
Dear women , we're sorry we have some rapists, misogynists and other assorted scumbags working for us. AKA baddons. If you think one of these may be trying to harm you on the pretext of Police work, please, erm... Shout at a bus or something. Or yes, challenge them for ID and ask about their authority. Thanks.
police-graduates-college.jpg
 
Dear women , we're sorry we have some rapists, misogynists and other assorted scumbags working for us. AKA baddons. If you think one of these may be trying to harm you on the pretext of Police work, please, erm... Shout at a bus or something. Or yes, challenge them for ID and ask about their authority. Thanks.
I think that summary is accurate, although you missed the 'you can still trust us, honest' after 'authority'
 
This is good, on how they’re all trying to absolve themselves of responsibility for one of their own & why they must not get away with it.

 
This is good, on how they’re all trying to absolve themselves of responsibility for one of their own & why they must not get away with it.

the met police, avoiding accountability for 192 years
 
her comments when she ordered JCdM to be executed should have stopped her career dead in its tracks:

I'm glad someone remembers the incident. Nobody else seems to.

The subsequent coverup drove Brian Paddick out of the force, a man who seemed to be that rarest of things, a copper with principles, who wouldn't go along with things for the sake of the team. When he ran for London mayor, I thought he'd receive a sizeable chunk of the vote, and maybe even win, given that Livingstone had become an embarrassment and Johnson had never been anything else. But he came nowhere, and we ended up with the idiot who's now ruining running the country.
 
I'm very glad you did though, in the end. And you've gained insight. I do understand that response - if anyone did anything to my daughter, I would probably feel the same way. But as you say - the person you did it on behalf of did not want you to do it. I felt like I was going mad, trying to stop them, just in a tornado of violence and I couldn't stand it.
I've been thinking about this overnight and speaking with my wife, as we have done loads of times - about why I personally was so violent and why/when it stopped.

Things happened when I was young which I later accepted made me very angry to begin, juxtapose that with a very tough boys only school where it was a toxic environment where you had to earn your stripes so to speak, violence was pretty much part of the fabric of the school and town I lived in on a daily basis, including boys against boys, teachers against boys, boys against teachers, corporal punishment, it was just violent. I embraced that wholeheartedly and loved, absolutely loved fighting, I was never a bully but was proud of being tough/tasty. I'd wear black eyes or busted eye sockets, broken noses/jaws like a badge of honour.

I wince to my very core now when I think back on it.

But what made me stop was 2 incidents.

Before my wife and I got together something happened to her by the partner of her sisters best friend, she told me about it as we were getting to know one another, and vice versa I told her things. But it made me so angry even tho' I didn't know him, didn't know her when it happened, it was none of my business except for me to show empathy to her. At a wedding I met him, instantly didn't like him but it didn't bother me enough to want to have a word or anything, until that is he made a comment about another woman there, something to the effect of 'I'd giver her one' - I can't remember exactly. Instantly I saw red mist and chinned him, 1% for that comment but 99% for what he had done years before. Long story short it (my actions) REALLY upset my wife (GF at the time), more than I'd ever seen her upset, until....

A couple of weeks later she was coming to visit me in my flat, she used to come up from Croydon to Ealing to stay for the weekend. This particular evening when she came in to my flat she was visibly distressed and told me what had happened, an unsavoury situation with a random bloke. Once again the red mist kicked in and I immediately went to leave my flat to find him but she tried to stop me and I pushed her onto my bed (fwiw it's the only time I've ever been physical with her) and left the flat, I spent an hour looking for this bloke, totally enraged and god knows what I would have done to him if I had of caught up with him. When I got back she was in tears and still badly shook up - I had left her there on her own in that state when I really should have stayed with her.

It was at that point I changed, it took a long time more to naturally not react, for years after I had to bite my lip/hold my temper in situations. I'm not saying there wasn't any more violence but it was only in situations where I was started on, or attempted robberies on me, that kind of thing.

It took a long time to go from loving violence which was bred into me from early to loathing it through self analysis and the love of my wife.

Bit of an irrelevant post, soz, just been thinking about it because this thread is an eye opener in many ways.
 
It's a tricky tightrope. Barristers are supposed to represent the best interests of their clients, while at the same time obeying the rules of the court (I know you know this, Athos :)). Nobody's going to like the idea of standing up for someone as loathsome as Sarah's murderer, but I agree with you that, for justice to be served and seen to be served, someone has to be there to speak for him. Which has duly been done, and I note that the judge was careful to acknowledge the defence's role in the running of the trial. And now, at least, the convicted party does not have the figleaf of being able to claim he was badly represented, or that justice was somehow not done in court.

That's well summed up... So I'll tack the most fucked-up thing mentioned when the judge discusses mitigation onto the end of that:

He has no prior previous convictions and some of his colleagues have spoken supportively of him.

(Paragraph 11)
 
Back
Top Bottom