David Clapson
Well-Known Member
Never mind colleagues catching on, what about professional psych evalautions? Don't they have those? Not even with the ones with guns?
They do, but they are not 100% reliable. Very few things are. People lie, people change, the police force notoriously has an internal culture of backing up colleagues even when they behave appallingly, all in all a lot of factors that could go wrong.Never mind colleagues catching on, what about professional psych evalautions? Don't they have those? Not even with the ones with guns?
I don't understand how a lunatic gets into the police and stays in the police. Before he becomes a murderer, isn't there some psych testing which could identify him as having dangerous bizarre sex crime thinking?
yeh like the number of times armed cops have threatened to lay down their guns when colleagues who've killed unarmed and innocent people have been threatened with prosecutionThey do, but they are not 100% reliable. Very few things are. People lie, people change, the police force notoriously has an internal culture of backing up colleagues even when they behave appallingly, all in all a lot of factors that could go wrong.
Imagine having to assess potential threats on the street every time you go anywhere. Like being in a war zone full of mines and snipers. Even if you're not attacked the accumulated stress must be ruinous to your mental health. If men had to deal with it I'm sure it wouldn't be long before solutions could be found.
I think the words, 'but he seemed so normal!' are uttered quite a lot, as though it ought to be obvious. It isn't, though. Women sometimes have a spidey sense that men just don't have from years of being exposed to this stuff. ('what, Steve? Naaaah. Steve's alright! etc) but even then you can't be sure. And anything that gets tested for has a fairly obvious 'correct' answer, so people are not going to give much away.I don't understand how a lunatic gets into the police and stays in the police. Before he becomes a murderer, isn't there some psych testing which could identify him as having dangerous bizarre sex crime thinking?
i think you're not being entirely realistic. these attitudes don't form overnight and so aren't going to be changed so quickly. and people have to admit they have a problem before they're going to change. it's not imo enough to say 'men must fix this' - it's going to require greater effort and change on the part of the media and wider socialisation to achieve that goal. not that it's not important to challenge those attitudes when encountered. but a greater societal effort has to be made, across education and culture as well as on an individual level. i'd expect it's much easier to prevent these attitudes, to instil different ones, than it is to change them.I hope this case can be a turning point. If more men start to pressure the misogynist men they know, maybe things can get better. The focus must be on men fixing this. Women are already doing far, far too much. How do we get men to step up?
Why did it take so long? Because the body had been disfigured/dismembered by the murderer?The body found has been confirmed as Sarah's.
Why did it take so long? Because the body had been disfigured/dismembered by the murderer?
because there's a process they go through, which includes formal identification of remains. this is for many people distressing enough without unfounded guff about mutilations being added to the mix, so perhaps you could give some thought to how you phrase your next posts.Why did it take so long? Because the body had been disfigured/dismembered by the murderer?
I can't see why you would murder someone for pleasure unless you were a lunatic. And if he is, wouldn't there be more chance of him being locked up for life, instead of getting parole after 20 years?Why are you calling him a lunatic there’s no reason to. He will probably try to claim that defence. Don’t buy it.
I dont want to speculate on his motivation, but human beings do horrendous things without being 'mad'.I can't see why you would murder someone for pleasure unless you were a lunatic. And if he is, wouldn't there be more chance of him being locked up for life, instead of getting parole after 20 years?
I don't understand how a lunatic gets into the police and stays in the police. Before he becomes a murderer, isn't there some psych testing which could identify him as having dangerous bizarre sex crime thinking?
It's not even been 2 full days which feels pretty quick to me.Why did it take so long? Because the body had been disfigured/dismembered by the murderer?
Isn't the point that the alleged (or indeed anyone committing such) is probably not a 'lunatic' in any sort of easily attributable mental health/psych sense at all? But that gender inequality, power relations empower men over women and are ubiquitous, and those imbalances are socialised so very young for boys/men so that the violent behaviours become 'normalised' amongst many men even if not enacted regularly. Just as people do all manner of horrible things often with power relations - racist attacks, homophobic/transphobic hate crimes, etc. but they're not attributable to mental illness.
For some reason, I seem to recall an old post of mine here about drawing a comparison between all cops as bastards and all men are rapists. Whilst clearly not all are in either case, it's about the use/abuse of power, and how do you know?
Hello HarmonyFlow , welcome to Urban.
But if you/we don’t engage with this kind of stuff , it stands unchallenged. Even if that person won’t change his mind it might help another person to develop their thinking.
I understand what you say about not bothering with someone so obviously entenched when it’s one-on-one, but in public (which SM is) then I think it’s worth the effort.
It's not even been 2 full days which feels pretty quick to me.
Because of things like you describe a little earlier stethoscope my heart actually sinks when a new person asks me for my number. Because it indicates to me that they weren’t just enjoying the chat, they had ulterior motives the entire time they were talking to me.
Yeah, that's exactly how it ended up making me look at it, and it totally floored me. I'm guarded enough at times because of past experiences and personal reasons, but I actually thought this could be something just nice and friendly and mutual. And that's how it turned out.
I don’t understand what this is about - there’s a court case (?) to determine if the vigils / protests can go ahead under covid law? People will just show up, either way, I’d imagine. And the police if they have an ounce of sense will stand well back.
Or maybe they develop such traits through being in the police? Perhaps with a certain amount of (latent or otherwise) predisposition to it in the first place.I don't understand how a lunatic gets into the police and stays in the police. Before he becomes a murderer, isn't there some psych testing which could identify him as having dangerous bizarre sex crime thinking?