beesonthewhatnow
going deaf for a living
what plane on a conveyor belt? explain this puzzle to me...
Don't. Just don't.
what plane on a conveyor belt? explain this puzzle to me...
what plane on a conveyor belt? explain this puzzle to me...
You ask a goat (chosen at random) what the plane would do if it drew a black ball from the bag.There are three doors. Behind one is plane taking off. What is the chance that the goats behind the other doors are both male?
That thread where we both shone like beacons of intellectual clarity and everyone else took ages to get it, which is a shame cos I accidentally deleted it.
yesSo, are we all in agreement now that the answer to the puzzle as stated in the OP is 13/27?
Plane crashes into the mountain. No survivors.
It's the difference between:
1. What is the probability of a two-child family having two boys?
and
2. What is the probability of a two-child family having two boys, given that we already know one of them is a boy?
They're not. Crispy failed at explaining his fail.
But we know what he meant, and he's back on form now.
Is this one of those puzzles where the answer's wrong because the question is?
No, it's one of those ones where you are wrong.
Right. So by the same logic:I concur. The day of the childs birth is irrelevant and if used gives a wrong result.
The second child is either a) a boy
or b) a girl
Therefore 50/50
Right. So by the same logic:
Today I will either a) die
or b) not die
Therefore, it is 50/50 whether or not I die today. Oh noes!
Right. So by the same logic:
Today I will either a) die
or b) not die
Therefore, it is 50/50 whether or not I die today. Oh noes!
Only if the amount of radioactive material in my box has been chosen such that the probability of at least one atom decaying over the specific time period in question (today) is exactly 50/50. And therein lies rover07's problem. He is not considering the quantity of material, only the number of possible outcomes. Which is why he is wrong (as are you).If you're a cat in a box then yes.
Only if the amount of radioactive material in my box has been chosen such that the probability of at least one atom decaying over the specific time period in question (today) is exactly 50/50. And therein lies rover07's problem. He is not considering the quantity of material, only the number of possible outcomes. Which is why he is wrong (as are you).
Im sticking to my own statistical analysis. Dont be bringing radioactive cats into this ...what day was the cat born on?