gosub
~#
It's dismal right enough.
The framework of demands from US capital is laid out plainly enough with both TTIP and P(acific)TP. Investor 'rights' trump public policy at all levels of their domestic arrangements, and they insist on exporting that arrangement worldwide.
As you say the current process is opaque and undemocratic so we have to guess which national governments are pushing which way, but there are hints:
The UK with its special relationship is already the Atlanticist bridgehead, the EU country militarily, politically and economically most closely aligned to Washington and Wall St. Post-Brexit indyUK would be in greater competition with the EU for profitability based inward investment, but with a government made up of Leave campaigners (in whatever alignment) - cue clear push that it's in national best interests to go further in liberalisation, light touch regulation and the rest.
None of us knows what will happen. Not all of us think the US economic, social and regulatory model is admirable. IMO we're likely to get some form of TTIP come what may, but an independent UK will get a much nastier version than rumpEU.
I can't say you are wrong, sadly. I'd add Farage and a lot of UKIP to those who'd sign up to it. But fighting it wouldn't be the shadow boxing it is now.Current President of US saying deal with an out UK may buy us some time, but 1 he won't be there and 2 politician s say stuff to influence things and do different when events go against.
But OUT would be the spanner in the works to the relentless drive towards global corporatism, that could be built on. IN isn't.