Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Pop Brixton (formerly Grow Brixton) Pope's Road development

I guess that from some folks perspectives the people in those photos might all look like young hipsters.
 
Update on Buzz:

Pop Brixton made an operating loss of £266,709 during the first eight moths of trading. It cost £1,589,960 to build the container village. £1,050,000 of this came from The Collective – a Mayfair based property development business who like to target “ambitious young professionals.”

The self-styled ‘community business park for the 21st Century‘ along Pope’s Road has finallypublished its accounts. The Future Brixton website originally stated that these would appear back in February of 2016.

The period of accountancy covers November 2014 through until January 2016. The main detail is focussed around the eight months of trading from when Pop Brixton first opened in May 2015.

A total turnover of £559,378 was achieved. The loss of £266,709 was largely due to the cost of constructing the pop up project.

The accounts show that the main income came from the rent paid by the tenants. This totalled £375,029 from 53 different businesses.
Pop Brixton accounts show operating loss of £266,709 during first eight months of trading at Pope’s Road
 
So they are actually donating to the community....well done Pop!

The accounts also show how Pop Brixton spent £121,975 on security for the green oasis. Garden maintenance costs came to £9,328. £250 was donated by Pop Brixton to charities
Brixton Buzz has managed well over £3,000 in charitable donations and we get zero income, so forgive me if I don't get too excited by their generous donation of just £250.
 
CTA appear to be making a profit of £8,575 a year (if my quick and dirty maths is right). It's lucky he's not paying rent.
 
But also aggressively depreciating the assets - not read the accounts but am struggling to see where that level of capital start up went?
 
I hope the loss-making is not going to be used now as yet another stick to beat Pop with. Given the amount of grief it gets here for not being enough community/ not-for-profit venture driven, it'd be hilarious if it's now criticised for not making enough profits.
 
I hope the loss-making is not going to be used now as yet another stick to beat Pop with. Given the amount of grief it gets here for not being enough community/ not-for-profit venture driven, it'd be hilarious if it's now criticised for not making enough profits.

Cllr Hopkins expected it to make a profit that the Council shared and invested elsewhere. Looks like this is overly optimistic.

We needed it to not run at a loss, better still to provide profits back into the Council as a revenue stream to begin the next wave of business and job creation

It may make a small profit by the last year of its time there. Or not as the case may be. But as Cllr Jack saw this as something the Council expected from this project its failing on this point.

He is implying that some of the profit share would go into the next "Pop" type project up in Loughborough Junction (minus the eateries). Realistically I don’t see that happening.
 
Surprised that Pop had to stump some of the money to move the Impact Hub into Pop. I assumed that would be all grant funded or funded by Council if there was a shortfall. Impact Hub was in the Town Hall so had to move whilst building works went on. So would have thought that the Council would have budgeted for this as part of the Town Hall scheme.
 
Cllr Hopkins expected it to make a profit that the Council shared and invested elsewhere. Looks like this is overly optimistic.



It may make a small profit by the last year of its time there. Or not as the case may be. But as Cllr Jack saw this as something the Council expected from this project its failing on this point.
Yeah but, so what, really? As you said yourself earlier many ventures make a loss in their first year. There have been no consequences out of these figures- it's just a financial sumnary of an ongoing project designed to run for several more years. To me is hardly newsworthy stuff, and certainly even less worthy of criticism.
 
Yeah but, so what, really? As you said yourself earlier many ventures make a loss in their first year. There have been no consequences out of these figures- it's just a financial sumnary of an ongoing project designed to run for several more years. To me is hardly newsworthy stuff, and certainly even less worthy of criticism.

Point being that you said :

"it'd be hilarious if it's now criticised for not making enough profits."

Cllr Jacko saw this as something that he expected. Im not criticising individuals here. This project was expected to produce a 50:50 profit share between the Council and Pop. This was on the agreement that the land would be given rent free. Brought up many times on this thread about the profit share.

It now looks like the projected profit share is low figure. And it will not happen until the end of the scheme.

So its not a sign of success of this project.
 
Brixton Buzz has managed well over £3,000 in charitable donations and we get zero income, so forgive me if I don't get too excited by their generous donation of just £250.

Don't get me wrong like - I'm sure a few people have been paid VERY equitably even though the loss*...they have also donated space\time to free projects ala calais kitchen.

*I'd like to see the accounts broken down and posted here as it means nothing to a charitable financial incompetent like me - but I know other people here are good at this sort of stuff if they can be bothered!
 
The real question is what is the underlying value this place has?


What resource does this place has that makes it a commodity?


I ask this because it is clear that the community aspects were disregarded

It seems to me that the whole idea seems hollow.

Some of the food places seem nice but not well represented. if they marketed this as a special food court i would be behind it. but no. it's deliberatly hipster bollocks crap
 
The promise:

2.jpg


The reality:

PopBrixton%2BThursday%2BNight.JPG

Looking a bit bloody green for my liking

ZPteRCX.jpg

Wow. They actually did exactly what they said they would!
 
Compare Pop Brixton's pitifully small £250 charitable donation with the thousands of pounds consistently raised for charity in the now flattened Canterbury Arms, which Pop Fields now sits on.
 
I hope the loss-making is not going to be used now as yet another stick to beat Pop with. Given the amount of grief it gets here for not being enough community/ not-for-profit venture driven, it'd be hilarious if it's now criticised for not making enough profits.
Why not? The money was supposed to go back to the council, so it's our fucking money. If they've spunked it all on trying to look like trendy Shoreditch park and shelling out hundreds of thousands on security guards and 'absorbing' money from elsewhere, why shouldn't people be critical?

I can't help thinking that if they just put on normal markets in that space - or rented it out to displaced Arch traders - and not bothered with all the trendy container park bollocks, they would have ended up raising more money than the comparatively tiny £98,000 predicted after three years. And that's on rent free land. Where's all the money gone?
 
Anyone got any thoughts on how and why a temporary pop up should cost £1.5m to build given that it's just a stack of shipping containers with some infrastructure attached? Those shipping units cost about £3k each second hand, so where the fuck did all the rest of the money go?
 
That is a lot isn't it. Architects fees less that £50,000 wasn't it. labour costs transport materials even if ten times that still not adding up to 1.5 millions worth of a great value for money temporary structure.
 
Back
Top Bottom