Serge Forward
Just enjoyin' my coffee.
How was it ever likely to get better with Starmer's new Tories?
I dunno, I think it's a bit harsh to cast the electorate as fickle; the very basis of the party system of Parliamentary 'democracy' is founded on the ability to change support. Most people are smart enough to know that the tory damage can't be undone in months, but I'm sure that the polling support for the new government would have held firmer if people had detected any actual determination to make people's lives any better. You'd have to be pretty politically illiterate not to see that the Starmer regime means nothing but a continuation of what has gone before.People are so fickle. What their lives didn't get immediately better 6 months after Labour were elected after 14 years of Tory austerity, Brexshit, and running public services into the ground. No shit.
People are so fickle. What their lives didn't get immediately better 6 months after Labour were elected after 14 years of Tory austerity, Brexshit, and running public services into the ground. No shit.
Continuing to support the crimes against humanity in the Gaza Strip.People are so fickle. What their lives didn't get immediately better 6 months after Labour were elected after 14 years of Tory austerity, Brexshit, and running public services into the ground. No shit.
Continuing to support the crimes against humanity in the Gaza Strip.
Abolishing the Winter Fuel Allowance.
Guaranteeing that council rents will rise above the rate of inflation every year for the next ten years.
Refusing to abolish the two-child limit on tax credits.
These are some of the reasons that people might be expected to be disappointed by a Labour government.
£3 bus fare as wellContinuing to support the crimes against humanity in the Gaza Strip.
Abolishing the Winter Fuel Allowance.
Guaranteeing that council rents will rise above the rate of inflation every year for the next ten years.
Refusing to abolish the two-child limit on tax credits.
These are some of the reasons that people might be expected to be disappointed by a Labour government.
I dunno, I think it's a bit harsh to cast the electorate as fickle; the very basis of the party system of Parliamentary 'democracy' is founded on the ability to change support. Most people are smart enough to know that the tory damage can't be undone in months, but I'm sure that the polling support for the new government would have held firmer if people had detected any actual determination to make people's lives any better. You'd have to be pretty politically illiterate not to see that the Starmer regime means nothing but a continuation of what has gone before.
Some people really must've had some high expectations of Labour if they thought any of these things were going to be rectified to their benefit in the short to medium term.
I think that you misunderstand.Some people really must've had some high expectations of Labour if they thought any of these things were going to be rectified to their benefit in the short to medium term.
Yes, I forgot that. An example of where Sunak was to the left of Starmer.£3 bus fare as well
I think that you misunderstand.
The Starmer government has not "failed to rectify" council rent increases and the abolition of the Winter Fuel Allowance. It has IMPLEMENTED them. It has not failed to "rectify" UK complicity in crimes against humanity in the Gaza Strip, it has actively continued it.
Not really, it would have ended Dec.31st under his plans.Yes, I forgot that. An example of where Sunak was to the left of Starmer.
They're proposing more of the same neoliberalism that got us here, so nothing will be rectified over any term. Some people thought they'd change their tune, once in govt, but they've doubled down on it.Some people really must've had some high expectations of Labour if they thought any of these things were going to be rectified to their benefit in the short to medium term.