Why? Who would have a problem with it? It's unused land. Nobody will hear us.
If there are signs up warning of undetonated explosives, and you throw a party there, and someone does somehow end up accidentally setting off one of these explosives you'd be so fucked it'd not be funny.The MOD site is unused. There is no camp. It's quite remote, fenced off and there are warning signs about undetonated explosives. Good, because there will be no dog walkers. I'm almost certain that the MOD never use it for exercises. This would be without any permission.
Just reading again...
I think if you get caught in an area labelled as such, you are not going to get any kind of "oh carry on until the morning then" type response. They will want you off immediately, will have you for everything, and any judge will come down like a ton of bricks, because they'll see you as recklessly endangering other people's lives.
Whether or not there really are any explosives is besides the point.
Maybe scout for another site? There's plenty around if you do your research.
as Snadge says, you'll be doubly fucked, and I think he's understating the risks... and as dan u says, google earth is your friend
ay - there's a reason I've been keeping my head down lately... can't believe the amount of shit we got away with.Yeah I am understating the risks, as one who had to talk to MOD cops whilst off my face, in the time before it all got crazy about the party scene.
I can't imagine how much pain would be dished out to cheeky, off their face, "we're only having fun" ravers on MOD land with clear warning signage about unexploded munitions in this day and age.
.
I'm getting a distinct urge to go to the beach again soon after this thread though
they did only ban me from doing warehouse parties in newcastle...Good Boy...
they did only ban me from doing warehouse parties in newcastle...
not an official asbo, was a bit odd as it was done by a council licensing officer that I actually know quite well from legit stuff, so it was more done as a formal caution followed by warning that they'd throw the book at me if I was even seen near a warehouse party again in newcastle (plus loose any future council events work, which at the time had been a fairly good money earner for me)ASBO?
not an official asbo, was a bit odd as it was done by a council licensing officer that I actually know quite well from legit stuff, so it was more done as a formal caution followed by warning that they'd throw the book at me if I was even seen near a warehouse party again in newcastle (plus loose any future council events work, which at the time had been a fairly good money earner for me)
they'd have let me off if I'd given them the names of the people who'd done it as well... grrr *shrugs*
ste9 said:The MOD site is unused. There is no camp. It's quite remote, fenced off and there are warning signs about undetonated explosives.
Bluestreak, would you like to join my counter revolution?
Can't quite believe them need to fess all to someone whose prolly a fed.....If each person at the rave owns only a tiny part of the rig, is it impossible for them to go through all the paperwork? What if alcohol is sold at the rave, does this change anything?
Recent precedents? Info much appreciated, TIA.
monste9
What the fuck is the world coming to???
The MOD site is unused. There is no camp. It's quite remote, fenced off and there are warning signs about undetonated explosives. Good, because there will be no dog walkers. I'm almost certain that the MOD never use it for exercises. This would be without any permission.
There are no explosives on the site. The signs only went up fairly recently. Kids used to play there. Locals walked their dogs there. There have already been smaller parties on the site. There is strong evidence that it is not used for military exercises.
you a copper then?
Isn't there some kind of etiquette on u75 about randomly accusing people of being feds/coppers?
There are no explosives on the site. The signs only went up fairly recently. Kids used to play there. Locals walked their dogs there. There have already been smaller parties on the site. There is strong evidence that it is not used for military exercises.
Freespirit, Can you explain the theory behind this? What if there is a spokesperson but they tell the police that nobody organised the event, nobody is responsible, and that it all just happened spontaneously. Obviously you'd need to go to a lot of trouble to make sure they can't blame any one individual, but I think it's possible.
Originally posted by edp24.co.uk
28 June 2008 15:55
Organisers of illegal raves were today given a stark reminder of the tough line taken by Norfolk police with the destruction of seized equipment valued at more than £30,000.
A giant scrap grabber scooped up the costly speakers, sound amps and electronic equipment and hoisted it into an industrial shredder at recycling company Pearsons's centre at Thetford where they were rapidly reduced to fragments.
Norfolk Police have a zero-tolerance to illegal gatherings in the county, and a van belonging to the organiser of an unauthorised rave on farmland was also crushed so it could not be used for unlawful purposes again.
Sgt Colin Barratt, of the Breckland area team, said: “We are sending out a clear message to rave organisers that their actions will not be tolerated. Knowing their equipment will be seized and disposed of will hopefully make them think twice about holding their
illegal events and fully realise the cost.
“For the public and landowners it is further evidence of our commitment to stopping raves from taking place anywhere in the county.”
All the equipment destroyed had been seized during the successful disruption of three unlicensed events held at Drymere and Cockely Cley in September and November last year. This also resulted in seven arrests, with the people involved being banned from rave events for two years. All of those arrested were also ordered to pay compensation to the landowners.
Sgt Barratt said the tough line is certainly paying dividends as demonstrated in the western area of the county where he and his team are based.
“Last year we had in the order of 35 raves in our part of the county. This year, to date, we have only had three. The big speakers are £1,000 each and it costs £10,000 for a rig, which is the whole kit and caboodle, so it is certainly hitting them in the pocket,” he stressed.
Sgt Barratt added that the police had offered the confiscated music equipment to various charitable organisations but none had declared any interest. “There comes to the point you have just got to shred it, to prevent it being returned to people who might try and use it again at other illegal rave events,” he explained.
The recycling firm's managing director, Jo Pearson, said the shredded material would be put to good use. Salvaged metal will go for smelting and the wood will be sent to a power plant for fuel.
Not that i'm aware of.Isn't there some kind of etiquette on u75 about randomly accusing people of being feds/coppers?
MooooostlyIgnore. It's post-pub time. They only come out at night. Well, mostly
Then they will just confiscate everything.
BTW, newish signs going up somewhere is a bad sign, especially for unexploded munitions, it's a "get to fuck off our land" and if you try arguing that with a MOD plod you're likely to end up with a rifle butt in the mush.
hope this helps.
So, if one person admits to owning the rig and being the organiser, they won't confiscate everything. But if they're told that everyone owns the rig and that everyone spontaneously decided to have a party, they will confiscate everything?
How does that make sense? How are we better off having one person to 'take the wrap'?
The signs are just there because people are paranoid about health and safety these days. There is a tiny chance that there are any explosives, and an even tinyer chance that someone could actually set one off. I would quite happily let my kids play on the site.
People who clearly know a shitload more about this than you are telling you not to hold your party there.
I'd listen to them if I were you.