They don't really prove m-l is true socialism, in comparison to other socialisms. But where stands the ussr now? Where is yugoslavia?Proven it was possible by Lenin's Bolsheviks who overthrew the Kerenskyite opportunists who were trying to sabotage the chance of a workers' revolution in 1917. Proven it was by Tito with his national liberation of Yugoslavia mostly on own without Allied help until 1943 and 1944. Castro managed to make Cuba stay firm against all odds from the US imperialists. Are these not the proofs that socialism did prevail against odds?
Marx and Engels first theorized that the dictatorship of the proletariat was necessary in order to achieve communism.Could you elaborate on what Marx said about the dictatorship of the proletariat as it's my understanding it wasn't a major aspect of his work. Certainly not sufficient to be number 1, the most important thing.
My robot and giant friends beg to differI think you got no. 6 wrong.
...7. Never wear brown shoes in town
Beats me, have you tried looking down the back of the sofa?.... Where is yugoslavia?
"the Serbian bourgeoisie"? I thought that it was the Dictatorship of the Proletariat?I agree. Yugoslavia was the closest to socialist perfection. Still the neoliberal IMF loans and the inner nationalism conducted by the Serbian bourgeoisie fucked it up in the end. Should have gone with Dolanc and you wouldn't have dealt with Milosevic that badly.
fellow anti-revisionist socialist like me and the rest of the unheard MLs, ostracized by the opportunists?
For I am very clear with what I am doing with the quotations. I am presenting the obvious, primary, and solid evidence that socialism is not what many in the West think it is and that they're all, by default, opportunistic and revisionistic.
So when I'm lying in my bed
Thoughts running through my head
And I feel that socialism is dead
I'm loving engels instead
"From each according to their needs to each according to their abilities"Just read the ML theory. It's not that hard. In details you get to learn the following:
1. Dictatorship of the Proletariat
2. Revolution is the only way for socialism
3. The vanguard serves the proletariat only!
4. A state cannot be abolished and will wither away only if capitalism is eradicated
5. The end goal is abolishing of classes and capitalism, followed by the gradual dissolution of the state apparatus
6. From each according to their needs to each according to their abilities
7. Reformism, revisionism, and opportunism are dangerous to the true socialism
In his head that's how it works"From each according to their needs to each according to their abilities"
You have got that the wrong way round. It according to abilities to according to need.
Leaf coriander (cilantro) abolished. People professing a like for it may grow it in their own gardens for personal use only, if they agree to be sterilised.
I just think he’d appreciate them. It’s nice to be nice.Sounds like a nacient Nomenklatura Comrade...
View attachment 447108
It’s nice to be nice.
10. Leaf coriander (cilantro) abolished. People professing a like for it may grow it in their own gardens for personal use only, if they agree to be sterilised.
That’s nice. For them in the short term; for everyone in the long term.
I'd forgotten that I had bought it! That is how much of a decadent anarcho-Fabian I am.Pannekoek's History of Astronomy is an excellent read and sits proudly on my bookshelf.
I suppose Marian-Leninism would be more your cup of tea?I'm not so good with the atheistic parts
Was Gorter's poetry much cop?Pannekoek's History of Astronomy is an excellent read and sits proudly on my bookshelf.
Moon and June stuff with a bit of proletarian revolution chucked in. Probably.I suppose Marian-Leninism would be more your cup of tea?
Was Gorter's poetry much cop?
Listened to an interesting interview with the editors of the Balkan anarchist journal Antipolitika a while back, they had quite a lot to say about how the Yugoslav CP actually nurtured national rivalries due to Stalinist ideas about the importance of nationalism. If anyone fancies tracking down a copy of Antipolitika #3, that's got a lengthy article about the Communist Party of Yugoslavia and nationalism in it.The working class, or proletariat, was in power in Yugoslavia for more than forty years, it is claimed. How, then, can it be explained that new bourgeoisies came to power in each Yugoslav republic, and working class people supported the nascent bourgeoisie in engaging in horrific nationalist slaughter?
I know that there were creditable examples of workers acting against the nationalist slaughter, but they were a very small minority.
It cannot be claimed that Yugoslavia was actually a proletarian state when it could fall apart without large-scaled proletarian opposition to the break-up. The very state that was supposedly a state based on the proletariat was complicit in the slaughter of working class people on all sides.
Yugoslavia, like other similar states claiming to be ruled by the proletariat, actually de-politicised the proletariat.
It cannot be claimed that Yugoslavia was actually a proletarian state when it could fall apart without large-scaled proletarian opposition to the break-up.
engaging in horrific nationalist slaughter?
Mine:
1. Participatory workers’ councils set up in place of community councils/parish councils.
2. Workplace councils in place of management.
3. These federated.
4. Palaces divided into flats.
5. Houses of Parliament made into stables. Even though nobody rides horses.
6. Public schools abolished. The buildings used as galleries of insulting cartoons of people in Bullingdon attire.
7. Free espresso for all.
8. Volvos for A380
9. Fleetwood Mac to be wiped from the archives. Anyone claiming they existed to be ridiculed.
10. Leaf coriander (cilantro) abolished. People professing a like for it may grow it in their own gardens for personal use only, if they agree to be sterilised.
The working class, or proletariat, was in power in Yugoslavia for more than forty years, it is claimed. How, then, can it be explained that new bourgeoisies came to power in each Yugoslav republic, and working class people supported the nascent bourgeoisie in engaging in horrific nationalist slaughter?
I know that there were creditable examples of workers acting against the nationalist slaughter, but they were a very small minority.
It cannot be claimed that Yugoslavia was actually a proletarian state when it could fall apart without large-scaled proletarian opposition to the break-up. The very state that was supposedly a state based on the proletariat was complicit in the slaughter of working class people on all sides.
Yugoslavia, like other similar states claiming to be ruled by the proletariat, actually de-politicised the proletariat.
Numbers 1 and 2 were the key (constitutional) features of Tito's Yugoslavia, replacing sections on democratic centralism. There is some really quite interesting discussion to be had about their attempt to forge a different path, their attempts to workers self-management (which wasn't all just theoretical) in particular.Mine:
1. Participatory workers’ councils set up in place of community councils/parish councils.
2. Workplace councils in place of management.
3. These federated.
4. Palaces divided into flats.
5. Houses of Parliament made into stables. Even though nobody rides horses.
6. Public schools abolished. The buildings used as galleries of insulting cartoons of people in Bullingdon attire.
7. Free espresso for all.
8. Volvos for A380
9. Fleetwood Mac to be wiped from the archives. Anyone claiming they existed to be ridiculed.
10. Leaf coriander (cilantro) abolished. People professing a like for it may grow it in their own gardens for personal use only, if they agree to be sterilised.