belboid
Exasperated, not angry.
Marillion(I've always thought Kayleigh by The Waterboys was ripe for reinterpretation with Lenin dancing in stilettos in the snow or whatever.)
Marillion(I've always thought Kayleigh by The Waterboys was ripe for reinterpretation with Lenin dancing in stilettos in the snow or whatever.)
I agree. Yugoslavia was the closest to socialist perfection. Still the neoliberal IMF loans and the inner nationalism conducted by the Serbian bourgeoisie fucked it up in the end. Should have gone with Dolanc and you wouldn't have dealt with Milosevic that badly.Of all the Leninist states, you could probably do best making a case that Yugoslavia was in many ways better than what came after, though that's only on a cursory acquaintance with the history.
There is that thing that presumably all the seeds of that were there during the Yugoslav era, the various national elites waiting to break out etc.I agree. Yugoslavia was the closest to socialist perfection. Still the neoliberal IMF loans and the inner nationalism conducted by the Serbian bourgeoisie fucked it up in the end. Should have gone with Dolanc and you wouldn't have dealt with Milosevic that badly.
You're right of course. I blush for myself and for you.Marillion
Yup. This is a Fabianite revisionist forum. I'm lovin' it!
We're all Lib Dems now, Comrade...See , I’m enjoying finding that my wanky reformism was in fact the dominant ideology on here.
We're all Lib Dems now, Comrade...
Fabian and Fash sounds like a hipster interior design company.I’m inmpressed by the fact that Urban today is both Fabian and Fash. Two posters say it so it must be true…
I knew as well but I thought “I’m fucked if I’m taking the hit: I’m not that pedantic!”You're right of course. I blush for myself and for you.
And it was none other than the Serb elite who were the most violent.There is that thing that presumably all the seeds of that were there during the Yugoslav era, the various national elites waiting to break out etc.
Waiting for falangist and farageiteI’m inmpressed by the fact that Urban today is both Fabian and Fash. Two posters say it so it must be true…
I hope you have paid all due royalties to Idris2002Son, have you ever kissed a girl?
Darn right you are a liberal democrat. Thank you for openly admitting that you're not a socialist.We're all Lib Dems now, Comrade...
Still waiting for YOUR working rather than quotes that don't say quite what you think they do"We have already said above, and shall show more fully later, that the theory of Marx and Engels of the inevitability of a violent revolution refers to the bourgeois state. The latter cannot be superseded by the proletarian state (the dictatorship of the proletariat) through the process of ”withering away”, but, as a general rule, only through a violent revolution. The panegyric Engels sang in its honor, and which fully corresponds to Marx’s repeated statements (see the concluding passages of The Poverty of Philosophy[5] and the Communist Manifesto,[6] with their proud and open proclamation of the inevitability of a violent revolution; see what Marx wrote nearly 30 years later, in criticizing the Gotha Programme of 1875,[7] when he mercilessly castigated the opportunist character of that programme) — this panegyric is by no means a mere “impulse”, a mere declamation or a polemical sally. The necessity of systematically imbuing the masses with this and precisely this view of violent revolution lies at the root of the entire theory of Marx and Engels. The betrayal of their theory by the now prevailing social-chauvinist and Kautskyite trends expresses itself strikingly in both these trends ignoring such propaganda and agitation."
- The State and Revolution — Chapter 1
You're as much of a socialist as keir starmer isDarn right you are a liberal democrat. Thank you for openly admitting that you're not a socialist.
"Just as the old opportunists and reformists betrayed Marxism-Leninism, the cause of the working class, of the revolution and of socialism, so do the modern revisionists betray these ideals and are pursuing the same road as their forerunners who are at the same time their spiritual inspirers. Those who have changed are not the social-democrats but the modern revisionists, who have fallen into the treacherous positions of social-democracy."
- The Modern Revisionists
It means you clearly have no intention to understand real socialist theory then.Still waiting for YOUR working rather than quotes that don't say quite what you think they do
You don't, clearly, if you can't articulate your politics yourselfIt means you clearly have no intention to understand real socialist theory then.
Hah. What does the Fabianite gentleman who has no interest in the working class have in common with a fellow anti-revisionist socialist like me and the rest of the unheard MLs, ostracized by the opportunists? For I am very clear with what I am doing with the quotations. I am presenting the obvious, primary, and solid evidence that socialism is not what many in the West think it is and that they're all, by default, opportunistic and revisionistic.You're as much of a socialist as keir starmer is
That's you telt Pickman's modelIt means you clearly have no intention to understand real socialist theory then.
Yeh but you've yet to prove that marxism-leninism is true socialism. And as you apparently have neither the intention nor the wit to prove it you might as well give up now.Hah. What does the Fabianite gentleman who has no interest in the working class have in common with a fellow anti-revisionist socialist like me and the rest of the unheard MLs, ostracized by the opportunists? For I am very clear with what I am doing with the quotations. I am presenting the obvious, primary, and solid evidence that socialism is not what many in the West think it is and that they're all, by default, opportunistic and revisionistic.
Not much I can say on your rejection.You don't, clearly, if you can't articulate your politics yourself
You could say 'goodbye' and departNot much I can say on your rejection.
Marxism-Leninism is indeed true socialism had you read up theory from Marx, Engels, Lenin, and what others had to comment on it. I provided you the chance to read on it and you're telling me that it's not "enough". How sad.Yeh but you've yet to prove that marxism-leninism is true socialism. And as you apparently have neither the intention nor the wit to prove it you might as well give up now.
Just read the ML theory. It's not that hard. In details you get to learn the following:You could say 'goodbye' and depart
Obviously marx, engels and lenin are going to say they're right. No political theorists say oops my bad do they. Given Marxist pretentions to their thing being scientific it can surely be proved. So go on. Build it up from first principles and prove it.Marxism-Leninism is indeed true socialism had you read up theory from Marx, Engels, Lenin, and what others had to comment on it. I provided you the chance to read on it and you're telling me that it's not "enough". How sad.
Could you elaborate on what Marx said about the dictatorship of the proletariat as it's my understanding it wasn't a major aspect of his work. Certainly not sufficient to be number 1, the most important thing.Just read the ML theory. It's not that hard. In details you get to learn the following:
1. Dictatorship of the Proletariat
2. Revolution is the only way for socialism
3. The vanguard serves the proletariat only!
4. A state cannot be abolished and will wither away only if capitalism is eradicated
5. The end goal is abolishing of classes and capitalism, followed by the gradual dissolution of the state apparatus
6. From each according to their needs to each according to their abilities
7. Reformism, revisionism, and opportunism are dangerous to the true socialism
Proven it was possible by Lenin's Bolsheviks who overthrew the Kerenskyite opportunists who were trying to sabotage the chance of a workers' revolution in 1917. Proven it was by Tito with his national liberation of Yugoslavia mostly on own without Allied help until 1943 and 1944. Castro managed to make Cuba stay firm against all odds from the US imperialists. Are these not the proofs that socialism did prevail against odds?Obviously marx, engels and lenin are going to say they're right. No political theorists say oops my bad do they. Given Marxist pretentions to their thing being scientific it can surely be proved. So go on. Build it up from first principles and prove it.
1. Dictatorship of the ProletariatJust read the ML theory. It's not that hard. In details you get to learn the following:
1. Dictatorship of the Proletariat
2. Revolution is the only way for socialism
3. The vanguard serves the proletariat only!
4. A state cannot be abolished and will wither away only if capitalism is eradicated
5. The end goal is abolishing of classes and capitalism, followed by the gradual dissolution of the state apparatus
6. From each according to their needs to each according to their abilities
7. Reformism, revisionism, and opportunism are dangerous to the true socialism
I think you got no. 6 wrong.Just read the ML theory. It's not that hard. In details you get to learn the following:
1. Dictatorship of the Proletariat
2. Revolution is the only way for socialism
3. The vanguard serves the proletariat only!
4. A state cannot be abolished and will wither away only if capitalism is eradicated
5. The end goal is abolishing of classes and capitalism, followed by the gradual dissolution of the state apparatus
6. From each according to their needs to each according to their abilities
7. Reformism, revisionism, and opportunism are dangerous to the true socialism