revol68
what, fucking what?
Except I, er, haven't ... you fucking moron.
Go away pig...
Except I, er, haven't ... you fucking moron.
Who's being "chummy" and pretending nothing has happened?
You even manage to lie about being told to fuck off because I have no intention of ever engaging with you again.
Fucking classic!
Frankly if Urban is going to become something of a resource for discussing and planning activity against the cuts then I think a cop like him should be banned from such discussions.
I'm not sure that their statement is particularly convincing when viewed in the context of what happened at 30 Millbank. Thousands of protestors had beseiged the place and there were some inside. This continued for some considerable time with no smashing of windows, mass invasion of the building, etc. Then a few individuals (conspicous by the fact that they were particularly heavily masked and hooded, especially by comparison with the majority of the protestors) started to smash the windows and encourage more aggressive activity.Anyway here's a statement for the Solidarity Federation on the claims that they and a handful of other "hardcore anarchists" and "protest junkies".
More lies from rent-a-twat ...actually I don't really, I hate db boy cos he actively spends his free time defending the state, most cops just do it for the pay check, he is ideologically committed to his masters.
(Awaits assorted lying bitches, fuckwits and cunts
I'm not sure that their statement is particularly convincing when viewed in the context of what happened at 30 Millbank. Thousands of protestors had beseiged the place and there were some inside. This continued for some considerable time with no smashing of windows, mass invasion of the building, etc. Then a few individuals (conspicous by the fact that they were particularly heavily masked and hooded, especially by comparison with the majority of the protestors) started to smash the windows and encourage more aggressive activity.
Now I have no idea who these people are. They may have been members of the original protest. But it is laughably ridiculous to suggest that if, say, half a dozen rent-an-anarchists turned up at that stage (bear in mind it was being shown live on TV and was in central London on a weekday, so it wouldn't take long to get there from pretty much anywhere in London if you fancied a punch-up, even if you weren't lurking around anyway, just in case) "the chances of us successfully [manipulating and controlling the crowd]" would be "minimal". It would be an absolutely ideal situation for them to exploit!
(Awaits assorted lying bitches, fuckwits and cunts quoting this post and claiming that I am stating that it was absolutely certain that anachist troublemakers were definitely, totally and utterly entirely responsible for everything ...)
Why don't you fuck off?Why don't you leave this thread?
You're unwelcome.
You really are a sound advocate for the principle of freedom of speech ...You should have no place on a board like this and I hope more people join in hounding you off it.
I'm not sure that their statement is particularly convincing when viewed in the context of what happened at 30 Millbank. Thousands of protestors had beseiged the place and there were some inside. This continued for some considerable time with no smashing of windows, mass invasion of the building, etc. Then a few individuals (conspicous by the fact that they were particularly heavily masked and hooded, especially by comparison with the majority of the protestors) started to smash the windows and encourage more aggressive activity.
Now I have no idea who these people are. They may have been members of the original protest. But it is laughably ridiculous to suggest that if, say, half a dozen rent-an-anarchists turned up at that stage (bear in mind it was being shown live on TV and was in central London on a weekday, so it wouldn't take long to get there from pretty much anywhere in London if you fancied a punch-up, even if you weren't lurking around anyway, just in case) "the chances of us successfully [manipulating and controlling the crowd]" would be "minimal". It would be an absolutely ideal situation for them to exploit!
(Awaits assorted lying bitches, fuckwits and cunts quoting this post and claiming that I am stating that it was absolutely certain that anachist troublemakers were definitely, totally and utterly entirely responsible for everything ...)
Why don't you fuck off?
You're an idiot.
It's been clearly stated anyone calling anyone a cunt will be banned.
.
Where?
From the FAQ:
OK, here's how it's going to play from now on. Anyone calling anyone else a cunt gets banned for the weekend because this topic is far too important to be trashed by childish name calling and endless personal attacks.
To repeat: anyone calling anyone else a cunt in this thread gets banned for the weekend. Starting from now.
Where?
I wouldn't necessarily disagree ... I've met enough in that category over the years. But my point was that the situation at 30 Millbank was actually pretty much the ideal situation if half a dozen agitators wished to precipitate something more aggressive rather than representing a situation in which their chances of success would have been minimal.Hmmmmm. I've been on demos where there's been a black bloc, radical workers bloc, whatever you want to call it. They've always been largely ineffective in anything except being kettled and getting their details taken by the police.
Both of these would be bad for Urban.
There.
There.
You were not even there. You really are a c-c-c-cunt.
You really are a sound advocate for the principle of freedom of speech ...
And thank you for acknowledging that there is a group of people trying to hound me off it! After all these months of denials that The Collective exists we finally get the evidence ... courtesy of a careless admission from their most retarded member!
Whereas, in your case, who needs to hear anything from you, you have nothing to say full stop.
I wouldn't necessarily disagree ... I've met enough in that category over the years. But my point was that the situation at 30 Millbank was actually pretty much the ideal situation if half a dozen agitators wished to precipitate something more aggressive rather than representing a situation in which their chances of success would have been minimal.
Oh I only wish that was more the case.
You should have no place on a board like this and I hope more people join in hounding you off it.
Infact the actions of the students have done quite a bit to enliven Urban, with alot of us cynical old fucks getting a nice shot in the arm.
I may not agree with a poster, but I definitely disagree with this. I'd hate it to become a political monk's circle.
I've been on more riots than you've had wanks over Juliet Bravo.
It's never the desire of the few wanting confrontation hijacking the will of the demo.
I may not agree with a poster, but I definitely disagree with this. I'd hate it to become a political monk's circle.
Post 1222 and a few that follow on in the pages immediately after that sum up my feelings about the protest itself.DB, I know you're coming at this from a police perspective (unsurprisingly), but what do you feel about the reasons behind the students protesting? Is there a justification for this protest, and the wave of protests that might well follow from other walks of life? Apologies if you've already answered this somewhere in this gargantuan thread.