I appreciate that ... but the point was that it had been suggested that it was Parliament's approval of the decisions of the executive which gives them force. I was saying that surely the decisions of the executive were approved by the judiciary. Obviously Parliament can subsequently overrule those decisions by changing the law but the basic rule is Parliament makes law, executive acts on it, judiciary rule on whether the actions of the executive are lawful. I wasn't suggesting that the judiciary were the highest power, just that it was their approval of the executive's decisions which gave those decisions force.