But if there's hours of footage and thousands of pictures a simple google image/video search would easily find one that backs up your 'assumptions'
Have you found none then?
NUS national protest against the cuts 10.11.10 [London]
- Thread starter where to
- Start date
Have you found none then?
Onket
Je suis [CONTENT REMOVED]
Well, it's good that we're really discussing the important points here, isn't it.
madzone
Physically unfavourable
Just out of the blue like? Or was I responding to gunner's view that it was wrong to intimidate the people working in the building?
Steel Icarus
ersatz maven
I think they might have been covered in the one or two other pages of the thread. Now it's just a turkey shoot.
madzone
Physically unfavourable
Nope - all the pictures/video I can find are of the reception area being empty of workers by the time chairs etc were being thrown through the windows.
Onket
Je suis [CONTENT REMOVED]
Because DB was using it as a reason we should all be cross with the naughty protestors. Now he can't actually produce any evidence he's making out he never wanted to talk about it in the first place
If that's the best reason someone can come up with to be against the protestors then, well........
So are you convinced none of the receptionists felt intimidated?
Jusyt for the record, as anyone who has actually been following what I have posted on this thread from the start will know, I have not used the fact that the reception staff were terrified as a reason why "we should all be cross with the naughty protestors" at all I have not used it for any other reason. I have not even suggested that we "should be cross with the naughty protestors". All of that is lies from madzone. Who simply cannot bring herself to acknowledge that she gobbed off about the situation, based on assumptions made from one piece of footage, and who is pathologically incapable of acknowledging her mistake.
She is the one making some big deal out of this, not me.
She is the one making some big deal out of this, not me.
madzone
Physically unfavourable
Read my posts
That's how it looked to me.
Steel Icarus
ersatz maven
Just for the record again, so that this lying bitch isn't able to succeed in her lying attempts to re-write history, here is one of my earliest posts (#1222):Because DB was using it as a reason we should all be cross with the naughty protestors. Now he can't actually produce any evidence he's making out he never wanted to talk about it in the first place
detective-boy said:Personally I don't think there should be a major reactive investigation here - yes there have definitely been some serious criminal offences which merit enquiries to trace principal offenders and put them before the courts (and perhaps some effort to idenitify agitators if any such did exist and stir things up from the initial burning of placards and pushing and shoving (which continued for good thirty or forty minutes at the time I posted on the day) ... but in the big scheme of things not many that are worth that degree of effort.
Sadly the comments by the Commissioner (especially his saying it was an "embarassment" for the Met) and the schizophrenic media coverage (now slagging the police off for not being robust enough having spent the G20 aftermath slagging them off for being too robust ...) suggest that this will not be the case and there will be a massive investigation.
That has been my view from the start. It is my view now. There are other posts which expand on the points I make if you want to go and find them.
madzone is one of the worst liars here and she should be shown up for what she is.
No. You're lying.Am I fuck arguing from ignorance
Steel Icarus
ersatz maven
Way to take the moral high ground. Calling Madzone a lying bitch is showing you up for what you are.
From reporter Paul Lewis, 1.51 p.m. on the day itself:
madzone
Physically unfavourable
You're behaving like we have some long running grudge against each other. I've barely interacted with you in the years I've been here.
stethoscope
Well-Known Member
Madz - D-b does this you'll find.
madzone
Physically unfavourable
Fair enough. I'm bored with him now. He resorts to petty nastiness very quickly. Nasty little person
fractionMan
Custom Title
d_b is the permanent victim who pollutes all the threads he's on with the same routine.
It's boring and disruptive.
It's boring and disruptive.
madzone
Physically unfavourable
It's bizarre. It's one fo the reasons I don't spend much time in the politics forums. I wonder if he behaves like this in real life
.
Onket
Je suis [CONTENT REMOVED]
Fair enough. I'm bored with him now. He resorts to petty nastiness very quickly. Nasty little person
You've wound him up and he's bitten. Well done madz, hope you enjoyed it.
fractionMan
Custom Title
Oh yeah, and he calls everyone liars yet cries like a baby when subjected to the same.
madzone
Physically unfavourable
Or what? You going to call me a bitch again?
Onket
Je suis [CONTENT REMOVED]
Why do so many people seem intent on winding him up, then? There is no need for it and it make every thread he posts on go the same way.
madzone
Physically unfavourable
You've wound him up and he's bitten. Well done madz, hope you enjoyed it.
Wound him up by stating my opinion? He was the one who launched into the abuse.
madzone
Physically unfavourable
I didn't wind him up intentionally. I stated my opinion and then he wades in with his own brand of nastiness.
Similar threads
