Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Netflix recommendations

Virtual high fives sojourner
giphy.gif
 
Trailers make me murderous. A lot of tv series show 'next time' bits at the end, and me and the fella have to race for the mute button, whilst simultaneously blocking our ears and shouting LA LA LA :mad:
I agree with that, some give the whole plot away. The only blessing of being my age is that my memory is getting so bad, that by the time I see the film, I’ve forgotten the trailer.

Another pet hate are DVDs and Blu-rays with menus which give away the best scenes. The blu-ray of Gravity plays its most spectacular set piece in a loop under the menu, a scene which should come as a surprise in the film. Why would I want to be shown that, just before I watch the film ?
 
My worst spoiler experience was when I grew up in Germany in the 70s we had a tv series with our equivalent of Barry Norman. They started their review of Alien by playing the entire chest burster scene.
Mark Kermode gave away the Sadako bit in Ringu in a C4 introduction. (long before I did)
 
Just watched the first 5 episodes of the haunting of hill house.

It's really good.
I’m two episodes in. Not totally sold on it yet, but I assume it’s the type of slow burn which gives up its secrets slowly and so far it’s promising.

I’ve read the novel when I was in my teens and I have seen the 60s movie several times (let’s never mention the remake). I’m curious about the characters.
Theo in the series is one of the kids and when she grows up she is gay, just like the Theo in the novel and the film (it’s hinted at that she is gay) But in the novel/film she was new to Hill House and not part of the family.
Am I right or getting something wrong ? I still can’t figure out whether this is a prequel to the novel/film or a variation on the story, which takes liberties with the characters. The servants from the novel are in this too.

Edit: Not very spoilery spoiler spoilered for the spoiler sesnitive ;)
 
Last edited:
I’m two episodes in. Not totally sold on it yet, but I assume it’s the type of slow burn which gives up its secrets slowly and so far it’s promising.

I’ve read the novel when I was in my teens and I have seen the 60s movie several times (let’s never mention the remake). I’m curious about the characters. Theo in the series is one of the kids and when she grows up she is gay, just like the Theo in the novel and the film (it’s hinted at that she is gay) But in the novel/film she was new to Hill House and not part of the family. Am I right or getting something wrong ? I still can’t figure out whether this is a prequel to the novel/film or a variation on the story, which takes liberties with the characters. The servants from the novel are in this too.
I wouldn't want to say, I wouldn't worry about either the book or the film although there are many nods to them.

And it is a slow burn...I'm not saying anything else if you're watching it...I'm away to watch the last two. I will say I love it when Netflix just throws out gems like this.
 
Another pet hate are DVDs and Blu-rays with menus which give away the best scenes
I’ve got the DVD of the (1978) Invasion of the Body Snatchers, which, when you put it on, plays the denouement as the background to the menu. OK, so I’ve seen it. And it’s a famous scene. But, come on, ffs, not everyone knows the end.

Plus, when I play even a film I know well, I still want to pretend I can’t remember the ending!
 
Fucking hell, was going to make a post telling people that horror is not really the main genre or point of the series, but a certain scene on ep ((?) made me jump to the ceiling! :D
 
Last edited:
I’ve got the DVD of the (1978) Invasion of the Body Snatchers, which, when you put it on, plays the denouement as the background to the menu. OK, so I’ve seen it. And it’s a famous scene. But, come on, ffs, not everyone knows the end.

Plus, when I play even a film I know well, I still want to pretend I can’t remember the ending!
i sometimes find myself wondering if the ending will be different this time :facepalm:
 
Yup, that’s just as bad. Never been a fan of Kermode.
Eh, while I frequently disagree with him, he really knows his shit and isn't precious about it the way some critics are. Plus he's a total geek. He loves a shitty horror flick, John Hughes, etc.
 
Eh, while I frequently disagree with him, he really knows his shit and isn't precious about it the way some critics are. Plus he's a total geek. He loves a shitty horror flick, John Hughes, etc.
Kermode is a media personality and obviously engaging as such but he’s not a film critic who I respect. I wouldn’t even mind that he has a massive gaps in his film history knowledge and often muddles stuff up, if he wasn’t so pompous about his almighty expertise. He has convinced people that he is the most knowledgeable film critic around, by constantly signalling that he is. He knows a lot about the films he’s obsessed about but lacks the comprehensive knowledge of film history and art in general, which I’d expect from a genuinely great critic. He’s certainly no deep intellect.

His fanboy devotion to The Exorcist is also something I find questionable, especially as it comes from a place of devout Christianity. I can’t take any film critic seriously who regards The Exorcist as the greatest movie ever made. It’s a very well made and effective film, but it’s deeply dodgy unless you buy into its Catholic propaganda.

If you want a genuinely knowledgeable critic who writes on horror and cult cinema, read some Stephen Thrower. He whipes the floor with Kermode in terms of knowledge and insight but of course he’s not as well known as he writes books and articles rather than have shows on the telly and the radio. The programmes Mark Gattis has made on horror films are far more insightful than any of Kermode’s self-regarding bluster.
 
Last edited:
I’m now six episodes into The Haunting of Hill House. I can see why Flanagan didn’t adapt the novel, as it takes place over a short space of time and wouldn’t have stretched to ten episodes, but I would have preferred they’ve changed the title. It’s the least faithful of the adaptations but the first which uses the full title of the novel.

In many ways this is more Stephen King than Shirley Jackson, with the back and forth time hopping between childhood and adults (which is reminiscent of It) and the ghosts remind me more of the novel of The Shining than Hill House. One more niggle, they shouldn’t have stuck that terrible wig on Carla Gugino, it bothers me every time she’s on screen. Otherwise, taken on its own terms it’s pretty great. The kids are very good too, especially the child actress who plays Theo.
 
I thought all the child actors did very well especially the two who were Luke and Nell.

Episode 7 stood out for me.
 
I thought all the child actors did very well especially the two who were Luke and Nell.

Episode 7 stood out for me.
Cool, that one is up next.

The kid who plays young Luke is incredibly cute,
so it’s all the more heartbreaking what happens to him. The Luke-centric episode had me shed a tear, the one devoted to Nell, too.
 
Cool, that one is up next.

The kid who plays young Luke is incredibly cute,
so it’s all the more heartbreaking what happens to him. The Luke-centric episode had me shed a tear, the one devoted to Nell, too.
Yes. I didn't say before but the way the show repeats the same scenes but adds in more information or shows it from another pov works really well. It does that all the way to the end.
 
Back
Top Bottom