Weirdo !Err no it's not, I've always been like that.
Just always been obsessed with stories and how they unfurl. Any detail of that beautiful unfurling being revealed beforehand proper gets my goatWeirdo !
Me too. I’ve always objected to trailers. I remember in the days of VHS saying “why bother watching the film now?”Err no it's not, I've always been like that.
Trailers make me murderous. A lot of tv series show 'next time' bits at the end, and me and the fella have to race for the mute button, whilst simultaneously blocking our ears and shouting LA LA LAMe too. I’ve always objected to trailers. I remember in the days of VHS saying “why bother watching the film now?”
Virtual high fives sojourner
Virtual high fives sojourner
I agree with that, some give the whole plot away. The only blessing of being my age is that my memory is getting so bad, that by the time I see the film, I’ve forgotten the trailer.Trailers make me murderous. A lot of tv series show 'next time' bits at the end, and me and the fella have to race for the mute button, whilst simultaneously blocking our ears and shouting LA LA LA
Mark Kermode gave away the Sadako bit in Ringu in a C4 introduction. (long before I did)My worst spoiler experience was when I grew up in Germany in the 70s we had a tv series with our equivalent of Barry Norman. They started their review of Alien by playing the entire chest burster scene.
I’m two episodes in. Not totally sold on it yet, but I assume it’s the type of slow burn which gives up its secrets slowly and so far it’s promising.Just watched the first 5 episodes of the haunting of hill house.
It's really good.
Mark Kermode gave away the Sadako bit in Ringu in a C4 introduction. (long before I did)
I wouldn't want to say, I wouldn't worry about either the book or the film although there are many nods to them.I’m two episodes in. Not totally sold on it yet, but I assume it’s the type of slow burn which gives up its secrets slowly and so far it’s promising.
I’ve read the novel when I was in my teens and I have seen the 60s movie several times (let’s never mention the remake). I’m curious about the characters. Theo in the series is one of the kids and when she grows up she is gay, just like the Theo in the novel and the film (it’s hinted at that she is gay) But in the novel/film she was new to Hill House and not part of the family. Am I right or getting something wrong ? I still can’t figure out whether this is a prequel to the novel/film or a variation on the story, which takes liberties with the characters. The servants from the novel are in this too.
I’ve got the DVD of the (1978) Invasion of the Body Snatchers, which, when you put it on, plays the denouement as the background to the menu. OK, so I’ve seen it. And it’s a famous scene. But, come on, ffs, not everyone knows the end.Another pet hate are DVDs and Blu-rays with menus which give away the best scenes
YupUp to the end of ep 6 of Tge Haunting of Hill House. Superb.
Ep 6 in particular and the way it was filmed... just wow
i sometimes find myself wondering if the ending will be different this timeI’ve got the DVD of the (1978) Invasion of the Body Snatchers, which, when you put it on, plays the denouement as the background to the menu. OK, so I’ve seen it. And it’s a famous scene. But, come on, ffs, not everyone knows the end.
Plus, when I play even a film I know well, I still want to pretend I can’t remember the ending!
Eh, while I frequently disagree with him, he really knows his shit and isn't precious about it the way some critics are. Plus he's a total geek. He loves a shitty horror flick, John Hughes, etc.Yup, that’s just as bad. Never been a fan of Kermode.
Kermode is a media personality and obviously engaging as such but he’s not a film critic who I respect. I wouldn’t even mind that he has a massive gaps in his film history knowledge and often muddles stuff up, if he wasn’t so pompous about his almighty expertise. He has convinced people that he is the most knowledgeable film critic around, by constantly signalling that he is. He knows a lot about the films he’s obsessed about but lacks the comprehensive knowledge of film history and art in general, which I’d expect from a genuinely great critic. He’s certainly no deep intellect.Eh, while I frequently disagree with him, he really knows his shit and isn't precious about it the way some critics are. Plus he's a total geek. He loves a shitty horror flick, John Hughes, etc.
You should take out the episode numberFucking hell, was going to make a post telling people that horror is not really the main genre or point of the series, but a certain scene made me jump to the ceiling!
Cool, that one is up next.I thought all the child actors did very well especially the two who were Luke and Nell.
Episode 7 stood out for me.
Yes. I didn't say before but the way the show repeats the same scenes but adds in more information or shows it from another pov works really well. It does that all the way to the end.Cool, that one is up next.
The kid who plays young Luke is incredibly cute,so it’s all the more heartbreaking what happens to him. The Luke-centric episode had me shed a tear, the one devoted to Nell, too.