Artaxerxes
Look out, he's got a gnu!
Detention is so good.
Absolutely. Just finished it and bloody loved it. A million times better than I had expected.Also watching Bridgerton - did a few episodes earlier.
Really good cast, highly entertaining.
Absolutely. Just finished it and bloody loved it. A million times better than I had expected.
Thoroughly recommended, and this coming from someone who doesn’t usually have any time for that kind of genre.
Great production values as well, and the soundtrack was superb throughout.
Exactly! Perfect Christmas fun Pisses all over Downtown Abbey and the BBC period dramas as far as enterteinment is concerned.I just found Bridgerton... well a bit silly really.
Sorry, vapid plot, ludicrous characters. They've clearly just chucked bundles of cash at someone who said "raunchy period drama".
Exactly! Perfect Christmas fun Pisses all over Downtown Abbey and the BBC period dramas as far as enterteinment is concerned.
This was deathly dullThe Midnight Sky.
Any other year, I'd recommend it. But not for 2020. It's too bleak.
This was deathly dull
Season 3 of Occupied is out now. You need to watch S1 and S2 first if you haven't already. Norwegian political thriller about a Russian invasion of Norway, resistance, etc.
Much better than it sounds.
Started watching today. First episode is very good. I read S3 is a bit of a let down, but I'll enjoy S1&S2.
I certainly rather liked it, and don’t get for the life of me the massive panning it’s received from critics. It’s a fucking satirical comedy programme ffs, and an undoubtedly decent one at that, and as good as most programmes in that type of genre. Is it because the critics saw the name Charlie Brooker and immediately expected something else?Death To 2020 was the best thing I've seen over the Christmas period.
Death To 2020 was the best thing I've seen over the Christmas period.
Yeah, I found the same. Turned it off after 20mins.Ah shit I watched it last night and didn't like it or find it that funny.
Same here, unbelievably shite. Drafting big names to read your poor jokes doesn't make them more funny.Yeah, I found the same. Turned it off after 20mins.
The Midnight Sky looks like it could be good. Out on the 23rd Dec.
I didn't mind it, but Brooker's own Antiviral Wipe was quite a bit sharper despite being the same content from half the same team.Ah shit I watched it last night and didn't like it or find it that funny.
I certainly rather liked it, and don’t get for the life of me the massive panning it’s received from critics. It’s a fucking satirical comedy programme ffs, and an undoubtedly decent one at that, and as good as most programmes in that type of genre. Is it because the critics saw the name Charlie Brooker and immediately expected something else?
I’m going to make the same statement I’ve made once or twice before (my apologies in advance, Reno ), and say that in this case the critics are talking out of their fucking arse, and being as much in tune with the general public as an Eton-educated Tory MP.
It’s not superb, but it’s certainly good enough for its genre, and nowhere near as bad as the laughably dismal reviews it’s getting.
I certainly rather liked it, and don’t get for the life of me the massive panning it’s received from critics. It’s a fucking satirical comedy programme ffs, and an undoubtedly decent one at that, and as good as most programmes in that type of genre. Is it because the critics saw the name Charlie Brooker and immediately expected something else?
I’m going to make the same statement I’ve made once or twice before (my apologies in advance, Reno ), and say that in this case the critics are talking out of their fucking arse, and being as much in tune with the general public as an Eton-educated Tory MP.
It’s not superb, but it’s certainly good enough for its genre, and nowhere near as bad as the laughably dismal reviews it’s getting.
You really need to lighten up a bit. I do find it highly amusing that you cannot tolerate a suggestion of a single failing (for I have never ever said that cinema critics are generally incompetent) in the professional reviewers' industry. For the most part they are either completely right or broadly right in my view.As you felt the need to mention me:
Thanks, we all got that this is supposed to be satire, whether it's any good is where we diverge. If stating the bloody obvious over and over, preaching to the choir and celebrities straining to be anywhere near as absurd or funny than the types they impersonate is hilarious to you, then Death to 2020 is comedy gold.
You need to stop invalidating the opinions of others by speculating about what they were expecting or thinking, that's a strawman argument. It's a little presumptions to elect yourself to speak for "the general public". I too am the general public and you aren't speaking for me. Just because because the standards critics for satire aren't as low as yours, that doesn't make everybody who hated this dismal programme is equal to an "Eton educated Tory MP". What utter bollock.