Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Netflix recommendations

Also watching Bridgerton - did a few episodes earlier.
Really good cast, highly entertaining.
Absolutely. Just finished it and bloody loved it. A million times better than I had expected.

Thoroughly recommended, and this coming from someone who doesn’t usually have any time for that kind of genre.

Great production values as well, and the soundtrack was superb throughout.
 
Absolutely. Just finished it and bloody loved it. A million times better than I had expected.

Thoroughly recommended, and this coming from someone who doesn’t usually have any time for that kind of genre.

Great production values as well, and the soundtrack was superb throughout.

Sorry, vapid plot, ludicrous characters. They've clearly just chucked bundles of cash at someone who said "raunchy period drama".
 
Last edited:
I just found Bridgerton... well a bit silly really.

Sorry, vapid plot, ludicrous characters. They've clearly just chucked bundles of cash at someone who said "raunchy period drama".
Exactly! Perfect Christmas fun :) Pisses all over Downtown Abbey and the BBC period dramas as far as enterteinment is concerned.
 
Exactly! Perfect Christmas fun :) Pisses all over Downtown Abbey and the BBC period dramas as far as enterteinment is concerned.

There's a point where suspension of disbelief ceases to be possible though, and it's just some very modern actors prancing about in costumes reading out their stupid lines.
 
can highly recommend Your Name Engraved Herein
but not if you want something light for xmas.

set in Taiwan in 87 just as martial law is falling, about a doomed romance between two teenage boys at a strict catholic boarding school.
the two leads are amazing, and the cinematography is beautiful. those make it one of those films you can become totally drawn into, and easily overlook any flaws (like the supporting cast lacking much depth).
 
Season 3 of Occupied is out now. You need to watch S1 and S2 first if you haven't already. Norwegian political thriller about a Russian invasion of Norway, resistance, etc.

Much better than it sounds.

Started watching today. First episode is very good. I read S3 is a bit of a let down, but I'll enjoy S1&S2.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LDC
I think Bridgerton may be my escapist nonsense solo watch. It takes me ages to get through a series on my own, so at a time like this it might as well be something frivolous and pretty to look at.
 
Death To 2020 was the best thing I've seen over the Christmas period.
I certainly rather liked it, and don’t get for the life of me the massive panning it’s received from critics. It’s a fucking satirical comedy programme ffs, and an undoubtedly decent one at that, and as good as most programmes in that type of genre. Is it because the critics saw the name Charlie Brooker and immediately expected something else?

I’m going to make the same statement I’ve made once or twice before (my apologies in advance, Reno ;) ), and say that in this case the critics are talking out of their fucking arse, and being as much in tune with the general public as an Eton-educated Tory MP.

It’s not superb, but it’s certainly good enough for its genre, and nowhere near as bad as the laughably dismal reviews it’s getting.
 
I don't mind Clooney in front of the camera (he's just an ok actor but an excellent movie star), but he should be kept well away from directing anything. I've found every film he directed an awards-baity snooze. I was hoping The Midnight Sky would be a change as I'm always up for apocalyptic sci-fi but reviews for this have been poor, most complaining that it's cliched and poorly paced.
 
Last edited:
I certainly rather liked it, and don’t get for the life of me the massive panning it’s received from critics. It’s a fucking satirical comedy programme ffs, and an undoubtedly decent one at that, and as good as most programmes in that type of genre. Is it because the critics saw the name Charlie Brooker and immediately expected something else?

I’m going to make the same statement I’ve made once or twice before (my apologies in advance, Reno ;) ), and say that in this case the critics are talking out of their fucking arse, and being as much in tune with the general public as an Eton-educated Tory MP.

It’s not superb, but it’s certainly good enough for its genre, and nowhere near as bad as the laughably dismal reviews it’s getting.

Considering he had to broaden the subject for the global audience Charlie still managed to make it very funny.

Without his monologues though the format was near identical to Time Trumpet. I would definitely watch a Netflix budgeted Time Trumpet
 
I don't actually like Charlie Brooker that much but thought his shoutiness might be a fitting end to 2020. Think I won't bother now.
 
I certainly rather liked it, and don’t get for the life of me the massive panning it’s received from critics. It’s a fucking satirical comedy programme ffs, and an undoubtedly decent one at that, and as good as most programmes in that type of genre. Is it because the critics saw the name Charlie Brooker and immediately expected something else?

I’m going to make the same statement I’ve made once or twice before (my apologies in advance, Reno ;) ), and say that in this case the critics are talking out of their fucking arse, and being as much in tune with the general public as an Eton-educated Tory MP.

It’s not superb, but it’s certainly good enough for its genre, and nowhere near as bad as the laughably dismal reviews it’s getting.

As you felt the need to mention me:

We all got that this is supposed to be satire, whether it's any good is where we diverge. If stating the bloody obvious over and over, preaching to the choir and celebrities straining to be anywhere near as absurd or funny than the types they impersonate is hilarious to you, then Death to 2020 is comedy gold.

You need to stop invalidating the opinions of others by speculating about what they were expecting or thinking, that's a strawman argument. Don't elect yourself to speak for "the general public", I too am the general public and you aren't speaking for me.

Just because the standards of critics for political satire aren't as low as yours, that doesn't make everybody who hated this dismal programme equal to an "Eton educated Tory MP". If anything, those most disappointed with the programme are likely agree with its politics, they just think that satire needs to do better than this.
 
Last edited:
As you felt the need to mention me:

Thanks, we all got that this is supposed to be satire, whether it's any good is where we diverge. If stating the bloody obvious over and over, preaching to the choir and celebrities straining to be anywhere near as absurd or funny than the types they impersonate is hilarious to you, then Death to 2020 is comedy gold.

You need to stop invalidating the opinions of others by speculating about what they were expecting or thinking, that's a strawman argument. It's a little presumptions to elect yourself to speak for "the general public". I too am the general public and you aren't speaking for me. Just because because the standards critics for satire aren't as low as yours, that doesn't make everybody who hated this dismal programme is equal to an "Eton educated Tory MP". What utter bollock.
You really need to lighten up a bit. I do find it highly amusing that you cannot tolerate a suggestion of a single failing (for I have never ever said that cinema critics are generally incompetent) in the professional reviewers' industry. For the most part they are either completely right or broadly right in my view.

And yet, the handful of times at most over the years when I have commented on what I believed to be a poorly judged critics consensus review of a particular film, you have pretty much invariably contested it, as if it was an affront that couldn't possibly ever be true and must be challenged. Out of the many tens of thousands of critic reviews of films and series in existence, apparently it is unconcievable that they might be wrong about even a single item, ever.. After thousands of years progressing as an evolving species, the human race has finally achieved infallibility in the form of the TV & cinema professional critic industry. Take that, God.

I could reference one or two of the other films or series that have used as an example of critics being well wide of the mark for incomprehensible reasons that got very high ratings from the general public (so not just me and my "low standards of satire"). But what would be the point? The critics must always, always be right, and even if the great majority of the viewing public think otherwise, the viewing public must unquestionably be in the wrong.

Anyways, this is far too silly a subject to argue or get angry about, so I'll leave it there. Happy New Year.
 
Back
Top Bottom