Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

More police brutality than you can shake a stick at.

I'm pretty sure he'd consider that hold to be something you use only if you intend to kill someone. I'm sure the prosecution could find an expert to testify to that.
I doubt it. Apparently it is a method of restraint that is taught to cops in Minnesota.
 
Chauvin was wearing a police body camera as well, the whole time. I didn't realise that. Which camera shows that he had his knee on Floyd's neck for 2mins 53 seconds after Floyd had 'become unresponsive' .
 
Chauvin was wearing a police body camera as well, the whole time. I didn't realise that. Which camera shows that he had his knee on Floyd's neck for 2mins 53 seconds after Floyd had 'become unresponsive' .
Chauvin's defence will most likely run along the lines of how he was taught in the academy that black men are at their most dangerous in the first two minutes after they have been murdered :mad:
 
Just imagine if he is acquitted of even third degree murder; that'd pretty much send the message that they don't even have to keep up the pretence of not being able to commit racist murders in public! Surely he can't walk from this, in the circumstances, with that footage. Surely.
 
2 week ago Trump was praising armed right winger for being on the streets of this state

what a difference a few weeks make
 
Just imagine if he is acquitted of even third degree murder; that'd pretty much send the message that they don't even have to keep up the pretence of not being able to commit racist murders in public! Surely he can't walk from this, in the circumstances, with that footage. Surely.

Say that to rodney king
 
I doubt it. Apparently it is a method of restraint that is taught to cops in Minnesota.

I'd have to see their manual. Most states ban choke holds of various types. If Minnesota doesn't ban it, that's highly irresponsible, at best.

Don't get me wrong here. I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if he and his buddies walk. People tend to side with the cops when an action is in question. There's a presumption of it being a tough job that requires quick decisions and that they should be given the benefit of the doubt. Sometimes there's people on the jury that wouldn't convict under any circumstances. We'll have to see how this plays out.
 
The cunt is in protective custody and Agent Orange, White supremacist in chief is calling for rioters to be shot.

You won't be surprised to learn that Trump is quoting a segregationist when he says that:

Trump didn’t credit the original author of his “When the looting starts” quote, but a simple Google search will tell you where it comes from. In 1967, the notorious racist and segregationist police chief of Miami, Walter Headley, declared “war” against what he claimed was a wave of Black criminals “taking advantage of the civil rights” movement.

Headley-newspaper-455x504.png


Miami’s segregationist police chief, Walter Headley, told the local paper in 1967 that he was declaring war on Black criminals, and that “When the looting starts, the shooting starts.” | Miami Herald, Dec. 27, 1967

Headley told the Miami Herald at the time that he intended to use shotguns, dogs, and a “get tough policy” that included the use of deadly force against Black people. “Felons,” Headley pledged, “will learn they can’t be bonded out from the morgue.”

He then boastfully claimed there wouldn’t be any problem with riots or civil uprisings in his city because, “When the looting starts, the shooting starts.” Those were Trump’s exact words from Friday morning.

 
Last edited:
I think I might already have commented on this video, but it is clearly a tall white man dressed in black in a face mask and carrying an opened black umbrella, who smashed the windows of the store and then walked away. Very odd, and quite suspicious.

trust fund anarchist perhaps?
 
Load of nonsense that video claiming umbrella man ‘started it’ as if people don’t have reason to rage and burn things and would’ve not thought of it if it wasn’t for that window. Just stupid.
 
Load of nonsense that video claiming umbrella man ‘started it’ as if people don’t have reason to rage and burn things and would’ve not thought of it if it wasn’t for that window. Just stupid.

it clear its in the middle of a riot


so ponder why it been painted as the flash point

more that likely just click bait
 
of course being arrested as a poor person just takes away your liberity, not your trust fund
 
Last edited:
But just how is this your first response? What is wrong with your thinking? Or you tell me what is wrong with mine?

Ye the video seemed weird to me, a guy fully covered up non chalantly smashing windows. Ye, trust fund anarchist was the first thing that came to my mind... what was the first thing you thought of?
 
Back
Top Bottom