Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Mocking an Eton boy's death is the worst politics of envy - Owen Jones

editor

hiraethified
I rather enjoyed this piece by Owen Jones in the Graniud:
Whoever wrote that Socialist Worker column thought they were being oh-so-revolutionary, so courageously and provocatively sticking it to the man. But all they were doing is laughing at a dead teenager, whose last moments were no less painful or terrifying because of his cosseted childhood. It is socialism with the heart cut out, devoid of the humanity and compassion that must surely underpin it. That might be their socialism. It certainly isn't mine.
http://www.theguardian.com/commenti...t-worker-article-polar-bear-attack?CMP=twt_gu
 
The Social Worker piece was in really crap taste. That's all.

"The politics of envy" is largely fiction. Leftists, would-be revolutionaries and the like are prone to certain faults, some of them serious, but in my experience of reading and talking to them over more than 30 years, they are not much prone to envy the rich. They may be angry at the rich, they may be outraged by the existence of the rich and the excesses of the rich, but they don't envy them.

I suspect someone else wrote the headline for Owen Jones' piece.
 
Last edited:
I suspect someone else wrote the headline for Owen Jones' piece.

Writers don't often get to choose their own titles. That's usually done by either an editor or sub-editor and, to boost it's chances of being read, they'll usually try and make it topical and link it to something that's happening on publication day. A writer might have a working title for a piece, but the final choice of the title that's used is generally out of their hands.
 
Writers don't often get to choose their own titles. That's usually done by either an editor or sub-editor and, to boost it's [<---a good sub-editor would change that to its] chances of being read, they'll usually try and make it topical and link it to something that's happening on publication day. A writer might have a working title for a piece, but the final choice of the title that's used is generally out of their hands.

Sure - and in some cases the sub-editor may write the headline without reading the article very carefully.
 
I pointed out to Owen Jones on his facebook thread shilling this piece that he told me that real socialists don't criticise other socialists, and he accused me of being a rape apologist.

so there you go people.

I expect that, among the cognoscenti, calling someone a "rape apologist" is just a fashionable way of accusing that person of being in the SWP.
 
I thought his twitter reaction was fair enough, I didn't much like the SW item either, but a whole column in the Guardian just seems gratuitous and sectarian.
 
Back
Top Bottom