Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Mick Lynch's time is up

I suppose it is revealing about his political currents, his China whataboutery in that article is quite something: Salam Hussein and slaves in Leicester.
Takes nothing away from his role as a union leader. Scargill was dubious on all sorts of issues, but he understood the political ramifications if the miners were defeated, and was proved 100% correct.
 
Has he considered that this is putin propaganda?
Not sure if you're being serious, but probably he hasn't, seeing as it isn't. There is absolutely nothing controversial about stating that Ukraine was/is a hugely corrupt place, where many flirted with fascist and Nazi imagery. They erect statues to fascist 'national heroes' and had at least one openly fascist minister in the first post-Yanukovich government.
 
Not sure if you're being serious, but probably he hasn't, seeing as it isn't. There is absolutely nothing controversial about stating that Ukraine was/is a hugely corrupt place, where many flirted with fascist and Nazi imagery. They erect statues to fascist 'national heroes' and had at least one openly fascist minister in the first post-Yanukovich government.
It is absolutely pro putin propaganda. The idea that Russia was pushed into this by the west is ridiculous.
 
I admire him and his delivery. I love the RMT. I think the indignation expressed here at his lack of adherence to gung ho capitalist driven war just make you look like dogs.
One can oppose the invasion while not believing Russia was provoked. They are not the victim, they are the aggressor. Conversely that doesn't vindicate nor justify corruption and nazism where it exists in Ukraine.
 
He’s the sort of bloke I’d listen to on just about anything tbh . He puts his points across in a calm and thoughtful manner that you can engage with imo .
I don’t have to agree with everything he says and neither do you however the idea that somehow he’s left his designated lane because he’s not does speaking about railways ( which if you’ve followed his activity will come as no surprise ) is patronising nonsense . Funnily enough his trade Union RMT have a policy on Ukraine and on other issues as well . Nobody played the ‘shut up Mick ‘ card when he said he was a Connolly supporter or when he talks about the need to build a working class movement .

Dunno if you have read the interview itself but if you have the terrain is ground that has been argued on here as well .

On the one hand he says in the interview “I don’t know if what I’m told by the Telegraph and by American policy writers [about China] is true,” which is fair enough, no one is calling him an expert on China. But then after going on about Saddam not actually having Scud missiles he says “we should stop being so belligerent towards countries” before refusing to address Uyghur slavery.

This is why I queried why anyone should listen to him on foreign affairs. He admits ignorance (or pretends to), but then goes on to push an apparently pro-China position. I’m not saying he ought to speak only on railways, but wouldn‘t his supporters rather he stuck to UK politics?
 
It is absolutely pro putin propaganda. The idea that Russia was pushed into this by the west is ridiculous.
Yawn, that again.

It isn't to support the Russian invasion to say that it was inevitable when Ukraine allowed itself to be sucked into the NATO and EU orbit.
 
Yawn, that again.

It isn't to support the Russian invasion to say that it was inevitable when Ukraine allowed itself to be sucked into the NATO and EU orbit.
Oh, bored are we? Tiny little attention span so you misrepresent what was said? Fuck's sake, grow up.
 
I spoke about Russia being forced to invade, you decided to interpret that as Ukraine being sucked into the EU's orbit. This alone ignores the fact that many in the country want membership.
It's the same thing. And what the Ukrainians may or may not have wanted is irrelevant when you consider that Russia begged to differ.
 
Are their interests served by a pro-China position? A Uyghur-whataboutery position?
You know what I mean. Those he represents are unlikely to care what he thinks about China or ukraine as long as they get what they want.

I doubt if that many miners endorsed Scargill's entire worldview.
 
Takes nothing away from his role as a union leader. Scargill was dubious on all sorts of issues, but he understood the political ramifications if the miners were defeated, and was proved 100% correct.
I got locked up at Grunwicks the day Scargill brought a load of miners down to the picket. One of the people in the same cell as me ( the local police cells were rammed ) was a miner from Yorkshire and as we got bored we spent some time on the issue of the ‘page 3 ‘ girl that was in the miners paper which Scargill at the time defended . Went for a pint with the lad after the fact that he came down to show solidarity meant far more than his views on page 3 tbh .
 
I got locked up at Grunwicks the day Scargill brought a load of miners down to the picket. One of the people in the same cell as me ( the local police cells were rammed ) was a miner from Yorkshire and as we got bored we spent some time on the issue of the ‘page 3 ‘ girl that was in the miners paper which Scargill at the time defended . Went for a pint with the lad after the fact that he came down to show solidarity meant far more than his views on page 3 tbh .
I got sent a young miner to speak at our LPYS group* soon after the outbreak of the '84 strike. His wider view of life raised some eyebrows, but to me he was just like the lads I worked with. Everyone had a great time with him in the pub later. He was a union activist, but different than most of the much more 'political' NUM activists who came to our local miners' support group.



*I wasn't in Militant, but we wrested control from them for a brief period; they flooded the branch and wrested it back. Looking back it was all good fun.
 
The defence of Ukraine by its citizens and the swelling of its armed forces through volunteers and the conscription of men has surely diluted the fascist threat and influence of the likes of the Azov Battalion. A little bit of support, goodwill and solidarity for this defence could go a long way towards marginalising their like, whereas abandoning a legitimate resistance would surely have the opposite effect.

Neither would there be much prospect for peace; which can only come about when Russia is forced to negotiate, concede and is driven back as far as possible to a point acceptable to Ukranians. Which it likely will be. I also wouldn't want a liberated Ukraine seeing itself as alone, friendless and with a fascist minority able to make hay with that narrative. That is, in the aftermath of an unprovoked war of aggression committed by a foreign country who talks about wiping Ukraine off the map among other things. One which sent in an army that is quite willing to murder, abuse and loot defenceless civilians en masse.

And that's before you get into the prospects for other states which could well be in the Russian Governments' sights in the future if their brutal war of aggression isn't checked. There's a mass of people willing to step up and do that, and they asked for help e.g. in terms of arms and equipment to be able to do it. And that vital support should continue. It's not about being 'gung-ho' or endorsing the nastier elements in Ukraine, but about offering support and solidarity during a dark time for Ukraine.
 
Back
Top Bottom