nino_savatte
No pasaran!
Prof Goodwin offers a mental contortion following the flying of a "White Lives Matter" banner over the Etihad last night, which thus provides a handy rationalisation for racists. He knows how to give comfort to scum.
Prof Goodwin offers a mental contortion following the flying of a "White Lives Matter" banner over the Etihad last night, which thus provides a handy rationalisation for racists. He knows how to give comfort to scum.
Prof Goodwin offers a mental contortion following the flying of a "White Lives Matter" banner over the Etihad last night, which thus provides a handy rationalisation for racists. He knows how to give comfort to scum.
There really don't seem to be that many people for whom posting on Twitter works well.When he sticks to stats and polling he's worth reading but some of his first thing that came into my head stuff is cringe worthy
Its a difficult environment as its easy to get drawn in on the tribalsim due to so many tweets.Loads of bots and posters who have about 12 followers butting in which you have to ignore. Danger of trying to reply to them all, narrative constantly needs to be repeated, pile ons from the right and the liberal left . Lisa McKenzie for example , who I have some time for , seems to have had a break after being chased down for suggesting that the statues weren't a priority for the working class and it was the 'left' contrarians who mourned her departure. Doesn't help with all these Americans on there either tbh.There really don't seem to be that many people for whom posting on Twitter works well.
Top down gestures that disempower many working class responses and create a well meaning but in fact resentful environment as anyone who has worked for a Labour Council . will know.NHS Trust CEOs talking the knee and sending round circulars about George Floyd and that (with capitalisation) Black Lives Matter
It’s not hard to imagine how that might be taken as a big fuck you to a diverse range of people
katie hopkins is much improved this past couple of daysThere really don't seem to be that many people for whom posting on Twitter works well.
Its a difficult environment as its easy to get drawn in on the tribalsim due to so many tweets.Loads of bots and posters who have about 12 followers butting in which you have to ignore. Danger of trying to reply to them all, narrative constantly needs to be repeated, pile ons from the right and the liberal left . Lisa McKenzie for example , who I have some time for , seems to have had a break after being chased down for suggesting that the statues weren't a priority for the working class and it was the 'left' contrarians who mourned her departure. Doesn't help with all these Americans on there either tbh.
Top down gestures that disempower many working class responses and create a well meaning but in fact resentful environment as anyone who has worked for a Labour Council . will know.
Theres loads of good stuff on there, it's just drowned out by the shouty dickheads and the smirking contrarians. Oh, and it's fine if you avoid the politics discussions too.There really don't seem to be that many people for whom posting on Twitter works well.
Quite right. It's Ambien .It's not Twitter or the atmosphere of Twitter that makes people make bad tweets that they shouldn't have made.
Yeah, I kind of meant from the political side. Just a terrible place to start any sort of political discussion.Theres loads of good stuff on there, it's just drowned out by the shouty dickheads and the smirking contrarians. Oh, and it's fine if you avoid the politics discussions too.
Prof Goodwin offers a mental contortion following the flying of a "White Lives Matter" banner over the Etihad last night, which thus provides a handy rationalisation for racists. He knows how to give comfort to scum.
People and posters from the IWCA have been saying something similar, though the banner was pathetic.
Isn't this it?But his argument, as I understand it, is that this is the logical outcome of identity politics - where culture and identity play a decisive role in how we define ourselves politically they become inevitable frameworks through which everyone begins to make sense of the world.
well the chap who organised the WLM banner was hardly pushed into it - but liberal ID politics does help feed all this white pride stuff doesn’t it?
Yes. It’s naive in the extreme to think that a contested hierarchy of victimhood wont be an inevitable long term consequence. Or that the more savvy elements on the far right wont increasingly intervene on that specific basis.
Outside of the twitter/middle class liberal bubble perceived differences in state/media/celeb responses to Reading in comparison to BLM protests and issues are becoming increasingly bitter.
Cut adrift from wider movements of social justice and with natural routes of solidarity eroded these are dangerous developments.
ETA: I think this is the point that Goodwin was trying to make.
Wind rush is white identity politics. The hostile environment is white identity politics. Police profiling is white identity politics. ‘Defend our slave holder statutes’ is white identity politics. But if you read this thread you’d fucking think BLM invented identity politics.
Impressively, for you, you are half right Jeff. Race, gender, class etc are indeed used by capital to code and organise society and to apportion resources and even to mobilise support for their interests. In that sense you could argue that it was the right that invented identity politics.
Those on the receiving end and their allies have a long history of challenging and fighting them over it. But a fight over the narrowest, most repressive forms of disparity correction is a dead end. Even you must get that?