Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Mark Duggan shooting inquest in London finally starts...

TopCat

Putin fanboy
"The mother of Mark Duggan, who was shot by police in north London, has said she hopes "the truth will finally come out" at his inquest.

Pam Duggan said that since the 29-year-old was shot dead in Tottenham, the family had been told "nothing but lies, misinformation, and delay".

Mr Duggan's death in 2011 sparked widespread riots in London.

The inquest has opened at the Royal Courts of Justice and is expected to last about eight weeks."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-24105858
 
Court reports:
Potential jurors in #Duggan inquest told firearms officers from scene of shooting will give evidence anonymously "for good reasons".
Duggan Jurors told Kevin Hutchinson-Foster who's alleged to have supplied Mark Duggan with a gun is a witness in case.
 
The Guardian's constructive relationship with Met on show again today:

Mark Duggan inquest jury to hear gun may have been planted
Local resident known as Miss J will say she saw suspicious activity by police after shooting, counsel tells jurors

I imagine there will be a fair few parking tickets handed out and 'random' breathalyser spot-checks undertaken around Kings Place in coming weeks.
 
So we still don't know what happened? Fuckinghell. Surely there where witnesses which is all you can go on. I don't know much about the lad but what was he killed FOR?
 
So we still don't know what happened? Fuckinghell. Surely there where witnesses which is all you can go on. I don't know much about the lad but what was he killed FOR?

According to police he produced a gun whether he decided to go out in a blaze of glory or he was trying to throw it away and it was misinterpreted. Or the police are lying who knows?
Eye witnesses are unreliable your mind will pray tricks on you under stressful situations. Got to do police judgement shoot training earlier this year. Situation happens you shoot or don't shoot and then justify your actions to the police. I saw blood stains where in reality it was a red scarf.
 
vikram dodd @VikramDodd
Taxi driver said one armed officer, w42, was in a rage "like someone who had lost their senses"

Interesting....report from court correspondent being given on R5 atm...mentioned all of that verbatim and added view of taxi driver that Duggan had been shot in the back.
 
It's more likely that he was shot in the back if feathers from a quilted jacket were seen coming from his back.

Well the Taxi driver did say that Duggan was attempting to run away from the vehicle, so that fits.
 
The Old Bailey heard the fatal shot was to the chest, entering the front right hand side and exiting the back of Mr Duggan on the left hand side.

So the witness who said he clearly saw plod shoot MD in the back, in fact didn't see plod shoot MD in the back.

The fatal shot is not necessarily the only shot.

Do we know how many shots were fired/how made distinct wounds there were? Presumably the C's report will contain the latter.
 
The fatal shot is not necessarily the only shot.

Do we know how many shots were fired/how made distinct wounds there were? Presumably the C's report will contain the latter.

According to TC's link he was hit by 2 shots. One to the upper arm and one to the chest.
 
can't wait to hear the explanation for the miracle gun found in a sock 10 feet away behind a wall. Theres going to be some bare faced lies coming out then.
 
According to TC's link he was hit by 2 shots. One to the upper arm and one to the chest.

The report in that link is about a previous trial in Jan, of someone charged with supplying a gun to MD.

I have to admit I can't quite get my head round the various conflicting descriptions there of angles of fire/entrance and exit wounds.

Presumably this will need to be gone through at some point during the current inquest - let's hope it's made a bit clearer.
 
Back
Top Bottom