Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Many dead in coordinated Paris shootings and explosions

Status
Not open for further replies.
Worth pointing out, I think, that these are recurring themes. Then the question becomes: how did such end-time nutters get their hands on such money and weaponry and power? Even al-qaeda think they go too far.

The extreme fuck-up that was the Iraq invasion clearly has a role in creating the space for them. Money from oil-rich Arab individuals much of the finance. But even then they still have to recruit. At what point do world leaders call Saudi Arabia on this? What more has to happen?
could you stop with this 2003 business. it's getting dull and leads nowhere. you show no signs of understsnding how or why such sunni alienation arose which limits the value of your analysis.
 
could you stop with this 2003 business. it's getting dull and leads nowhere. you show no signs of understsnding how or why such sunni alienation arose which limits the value of your analysis.

Go on then, explain. But you need not only to explain the process of alienation - you also need to explain how that alienation was turned towards an extreme end-of-the-world death cult. That took serious finance and effort and support.
 
I'd double like your post if i could but sadly ( as in x11 sadly) i think division & polarisation is most of the point of the action last night. :(

Yet, despite the various terrorist attacks this "polarisation and division" hasn't happened (with the exception of those already on this path)
Hopefully the OTT reaction these people long for won't happen.
 
littlebabyjesus
:facepalm: you have ignored the past eight years in iraq. you didn't notice the sectarian baghdad govt. they lost tribes which the us had had onside against aq. not going to spoonfeed you when you've shown no willingness to relieve your own ignorance and a worrying habit of pontificating from the position of ignorance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tim
Someone I know, who possibly reads the Mail, will now be saying "I told you so!" because their main concern with respect to the refugee crisis was that among the refugees could be terrorists and in their words, even if it is only 1 in 500 that is a lot of terrorists getting through.

Whatever your own or my own feelings on this, there will be sympathy with this view in sections of the country.
 
Someone I know, who possibly reads the Mail, will now be saying "I told you so!" because their main concern with respect to the refugee crisis was that among the refugees could be terrorists and in their words, even if it is only 1 in 500 that is a lot of terrorists getting through.

Whatever your own or my own feelings on this, there will be sympathy with this view in sections of the country.
But that's entirely illogical. There's no way that anyone recently arrived orchestrated something as big as last night. That's so obvious I can't believe anyone is even hinting at it.
 
But that's entirely illogical. There's no way that anyone recently arrived orchestrated something as big as last night. That's so obvious I can't believe anyone is even hinting at it.

Sadly, it isn't entirely illogical - all they would have needed is someone to house them, and for weapons to be supplied.
 
F# is a letter? (I do know midi btw, but let's forget humour for now)
No it is not a letter and if it were a simple code of swapping values would not be very complex. It would also not be very hidden which is the reason for the steganography tag. You say you know midi so, a midi message comprises One status byte and one , two or none data bytes. Control changes happen less frequently than note on/offs but still have a space allocated in the lower nibble of the next byte same as pitch control gizmos (portamentos), they can take the whole of the third byte, yet if the values are not there the code will still run as a a midi file.So now what we have is for every bass drum beat up to two bytes of data that can be filled with other values.
 
But that's entirely illogical. There's no way that anyone recently arrived orchestrated something as big as last night. That's so obvious I can't believe anyone is even hinting at it.
Well apparently one of the perpetrators was a recent arrival in Europe but I don't see how that's here nor there really. If he'd arrived on a plane travelling first class, he's still a scummy murdering fucker
 
But that's entirely illogical. There's no way that anyone recently arrived orchestrated something as big as last night. That's so obvious I can't believe anyone is even hinting at it.
Those orchestrating the barbarity required individuals willing to blow themselves up. Unfortunately for those of us striving to make refugees welcome, it is entirely possible that recently arrived jihadis presenting as refugees undertook last night's outrage. It is an unpalatable truth, but it was almost certainly one of ISIS' intents to fuel the right-wing, anti-refugee belief that jihadis radicalised in Syria/Iraq were able to eventually make their way to Paris using the refugee crisis as cover.
 
Last edited:
Sadly, it isn't entirely illogical - all they would have needed is someone to house them, and for weapons to be supplied.
Indeed. But the planners would have been in situ.

Who cares anyway. It doesn't matter. There will be a right wing narrative about it, and a Government (probably slightly less rightwing but still rightwing) narrative, both of which have more to do with propaganda than reality. Logic and facts won't make a dent in the way the story is told.
 
Sadly, it isn't entirely illogical - all they would have needed is someone to house them, and for weapons to be supplied.
The AK47s would have been simple, the Balkans are swimming in them but the suicide vests would have needed some expertise in explosives, I doubt the person(s) who supplied them took part in the raid, so they are still at large. And thinking back to the Charlie Hebdo attack, back then they didn't have vests, so this operation was more complex in that regard.
 
Indeed. But the planners would have been in situ.

Who cares anyway. It doesn't matter. There will be a right wing narrative about it, and a Government (probably slightly less rightwing but still rightwing) narrative, both of which have more to do with propaganda than reality. Logic and facts won't make a dent in the way the story is told.
The ability to sway public opinion on this issue does matter.
 
Someone I know, who possibly reads the Mail, will now be saying "I told you so!" because their main concern with respect to the refugee crisis was that among the refugees could be terrorists and in their words, even if it is only 1 in 500 that is a lot of terrorists getting through.

Whatever your own or my own feelings on this, there will be sympathy with this view in sections of the country.
Someone you know? " "my own feelings of this" "possibly reads the mail"
Wanted to give a balanced reply, but the ongoing news and half a bottle of wine says "fuck off you two faced twat"
 
The AK47s would have been simple, the Balkans are swimming in them but the suicide vests would have needed some expertise in explosives, I doubt the person(s) who supplied them took part in the raid, so they are still at large. And thinking back to the Charlie Hebdo attack, back then they didn't have vests, so this operation was more complex in that regard.

I suspect the football stadium bombers were equipped with suicide vests with preprogrammed timers, whether they were aware of this and thought they could control the explosions will probably become evident in the coming days.
 
I always enjoy your well thought out replies, I imagine you as a Pickman's model aged 13/and a half;)
Though,you have the opportunity to avoid that particular course of development;)
So what about that balanced reply then, assuming you are not too drunk?

And the person whose views I was mentioning is ex military, definitely not me!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom