ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
Your example is of Paratroopers. So-called "Special Forces" who are assault troops. To use them as an example of the average soldier or infantryman misses the pointYes. Of course they are.
I take no issue with the fact that red mists exists. I take no issue with the fact that soldiers are trained not to let it take them over. And that for the most part their training works, the more so the more highly trained the particular unit and their supervisors.
It works so well that we have far more examples of police succumbing to the red mist under pressure than we do of soldiers, even when the soldiers are in situations that are far more dangerous.But I also claim that the police are trained not to let it take them over too. And that for the most part their training works, the more so the more highly trained the particular unit and their supervisors. And that sometimes both soldiers and police succumb to it.
Anyone who's familiar with my posting history knows that I'm critical of the military, and even you know that I've never attributed 100% reliability to the military (although, in your usual slap-dash way, I'm sure you've inferred it), and that you have indeed made an assumption and are attempting to dress it up as a fact.It is your absolute failure to acknowledge that soldiers ever fuck up and you constant comparison of their 100% reliability with the police who you plainly consider a bunch of amateur fuckwits that leads to me concluding that you are (a) pro-military and (b) anti-police. Not any "assumption" on my part - the fact of what you write.
If it's a fact rather than an inference on your part, post up some proof. If you can't, then be quiet.