Serge Forward
Just enjoyin' my coffee.
Luxury! When I were a lad we had to make do with just speed, an eighth of leb and some glue.I always thought gen X was because we all necked pills. Was there another reason?
Luxury! When I were a lad we had to make do with just speed, an eighth of leb and some glue.I always thought gen X was because we all necked pills. Was there another reason?
Definitely would make your mind go boomer.Luxury! When I were a lad we had to make do with just speed, an eighth of leb and some glue.
No, that was the Watneys Party Seven.Definitely would make your mind go boomer.
This doesn’t make sense. I’m Gen X and my first prime minister was Heath!One thing I will say about Gen X, your first three PMs have been doozies: Cameron, Johnson and Truss.
Generation X?
And this is where it all breaks down. I don’t think I’ve got anything at all in common with any of those people except we were born within made up boundaries.One thing I will say about Gen X, your first three PMs have been doozies: Cameron, Johnson and Truss.
Ah! Gen X prime ministers! Ruling class consistency.As in PMs born of your generation
here is the thread on the hell site
It’s no longer possible for non subscribers to see threads on TwiX. It’s one of Space Karen’s killer ideas.Thanks, but I'm not on twitter and my (boomer ) IT skills can't find a way to get to the comments. Probably best.
One thing I will say about Gen X, your first three PMs have been doozies: Cameron, Johnson and Truss.
Yup, ignorance is bliss.You can get around it by using nitter, like so. But then you can read the comments, so double-edged sword at best.
We-e-ll <takes deep breath>, I’ll no doubt regret this, but I suspect what has happened is that short hands have emerged, partly encouraged by character-count-limits, and assumptions are made as a result. But the short hands mean different things to different people, and wires get crossed.Realise I'm falling into the trap of responding to some random on twitter, but the idea that rejecting id pols is inherently transphobic is quite something. Quite a few things that should exist independently of each other have been glued together if you can end up thinking that.
In this spirit of healing, I feel I should also point out that the characters, organisations and events portrayed in the short story Bookfair! are for entertainment purposes only. They should not be confused with any actually existing bookfairs or revolutionary groupuscules.Fwiw, as the person who originally posted the relevant Musksite screenshots, I wasn't particularly trying to drop Bristol in it, just to illustrate the weirdness of the original accuser making the claim in extremely vague terms and then immediately switching to "well, I can't remember but I think someone said that anyway" as soon as there was an attempt to clarify.
...the idea that rejecting id pols is inherently transphobic is quite something. Quite a few things that should exist independently of each other have been glued together if you can end up thinking that.
Very generous of you. I thought they just came across as wrecking cunts.Those ACN twitter threads are fucking such bollocks, people clearly don't have a fucking clue what they're talking about.
And I look at their Twitter feeds and profiles and they look at best completely erratic and confused.
Yeah, in so far as anyone's coming close to engaging with the actual ACG/N are actually saying I think you had a point here:That's something I've come across a fair bit tbh, as well as people saying it's racist.... Some of all this is obviously people using the same terms and not agreeing on them, and some of it is this ongoing common confusion around class and capitalism.
Very weird seeing this mash-up of trans and Ukraine stuff.
I think there is an extent to which, as far as people can be said to have an understandable critique, it seems to be people convinced that the class-based perspective focusing on exploitation is inherently, what's the word, dismissive of oppression and people being bad to each other. But then you do get people just being utterly bonkers as well, like the person who seems convinced that the Manchester bookfair organisers are now essentially indistinguishable from the tories and so on.With the Ukraine support stuff I do think there's something going on with the emphasis that identity politics has on 'oppression' rather than 'exploitation' as a political cornerstone, and the same goes for some bits of the anarchist movement as well. The politics around 'exploitation' tends to lead one into a more class based perspective, the focus on 'oppression' a much more individualist position on people being 'bad' to one another which in turn leads to things like support for people suffering these 'bad' things, more uncritical support for national liberation struggles for example.
For many of us, it’s the return to normality, the prospect of another year of the grinding everyday, that makes the end of a political sequence unbearable. Through the experience of defeat we realize that the quotidian is constituted by defeat; the normal functioning of capitalism is continuous counter-revolution. Depression and anxiety are forms through which this victory is secured, through which people are rendered compliant, isolated, but only when these moods are modulated by brief moments of hopefulness, relief, imagination, ambition. What capitalism wants is a continuous, low-level unhappiness. They want people engaged in a continuous process of emotional management – with images, with work, with sex, with commodities. Anything more extreme makes people unpredictable, and it’s no surprise that communities that define themselves in opposition to the status quo are filled with the most wounded and miserable types. Once such feelings get politicized, once their political origins are disclosed, all sorts of problems result. Because these affects are the one thing that people in such communities are guaranteed to share, they tend to be valorized as a mark of authenticity; they become markers of an identity, something to hold onto, burnish, aestheticize, worship. Our feelings become not the motivation for our politics, not their energy source, but their object. The result is miserabilism, a community formed by a shared unhappiness, whose reproduction secretly depends upon the continuous provision of more sources of unhappiness.