flypanam
Sausage to fortune
Fuck that I want to see where this baphomet thing is going.I'm waiting for people to watch the highlights and then report back on here.
Fuck that I want to see where this baphomet thing is going.I'm waiting for people to watch the highlights and then report back on here.
i think you'll find it goes back much further than frederick the great, at least to the roman king numa, as machiavelli points out in the discourses (which are freely available online) where he says that religion justifies the state. but there is religion and religion, as anyone who has read the pursuit of the millennium (among other books) will tell you.Quite. Here are we are getting excited by the usual state propaganda (myths), remembering, as Fred the Great of Prussia remarked (in essence), that religion is an invention of the state.
this may be the longest tory leader's speech in history thenHaven't seen or read the speech but she seems to have been naming names, a list of her enemies, the anti-growth coalition, which seems to be very numerous.
There’s no such thing as the devil and no such thing as Baphomet. They both exist only as ideas, representations, moral lessons. As such, if the Christians want to decide their devil is Satan is Baphomet, they are no more or less correct about that than they are about any other myth they make up.
M People are the enemies of the M People.
Oh yeah sorry, I meant beelzebod.
This is like the markets responding to the mini-budget.there is no theological status of baphomet
A misquote AND a misattribution. Well done internet.
You really think they’d have learnt by now what people can do given a solid colour backgroundView attachment 345883
Neckline of her dress cut in the shape of Baphomet himself. Definitely killed the queen.
The Anti-Woke Brigade in full effect:
Maybe she isn't, but those are not the grounds on which we should hate her.Just to remind everyone, this is the person in charge of the public healthcare system. A picture of health herself.
to be fair i don't think the health secretary needs to be a picture of health. they just shouldn't trample over the health of everyone else, and in her brief time at the department of health dr coffey has shown how she doesn't give a fuck about the health of the people, scrapping eg the work that had been done on obesity. she does look pretty much the same now as when i was briefly acquainted with her many years ago. but back then she didn't have the power to damage people's health that she now enjoys.Just to remind everyone, this is the person in charge of the public healthcare system. A picture of health herself.
Just to remind everyone, this is the person in charge of the public healthcare system. A picture of health herself.
Apparently the guy who wrote this song aint pleased. I never understand why artists dont get asked if politicians can use their songs (trump/rolling stones etc)
Apparently the guy who wrote this song aint pleased. I never understand why artists dont get asked if politicians can use their songs (trump/rolling stones etc)
A misquote AND a misattribution. Well done internet.
It's not even moralistic really is it, not even that complex. It's just 'look at this gross fat bitch'Oh fuck off with that shit moralistic bollocks.
She'd be the same cunt if she lived on kale and quinoa and ran every morning.
Basically licensing agreements. It's pretty complex. I've done some work helping out a friend's band and have completely forgotten most of it. But somewhere between agents, PR, lawyers, management and artists, they will draft an agreement on what the music can be licensed for. Usually that's going to be an exclusive list, and it's a bit difficult to comprehensively work that out. I imagine more established management will be used to working that out, but obviously every artist has different requirements, and every artist wants to keep that list as expansive as possible (money) without compromising too much on their values. Once that agreement is reached the artist probably isn't going to hear about any of the decisions, simply because they're a muso, and would rather be doing other shit. And these things usually have to be worked out very quickly (production schedules). This sounds like someone ballsed up, or possibly there er... hmm. It is possible, though certainly only one of a number of possibilities and no-one should be accused of anything, this is pure speculation... it is possible that an omission of the full nature of the conference to be licensed to could have occurred. Because 'political purposes' is probably something I'd slap in there by default as 'artist should be consulted'.
n.b again, just have kind of tangential experience, not a professional opinion, please don't sue me.
Don't these people just decide to use what they like and fuck the consequences. Then they get a cease and desist and at that point its too late. Conference overBasically licensing agreements. It's pretty complex. I've done some work helping out a friend's band and have completely forgotten most of it. But somewhere between agents, PR, lawyers, management and artists, they will draft an agreement on what the music can be licensed for. Usually that's going to be an exclusive list, and it's a bit difficult to comprehensively work that out. I imagine more established management will be used to working that out, but obviously every artist has different requirements, and every artist wants to keep that list as expansive as possible (money) without compromising too much on their values. Once that agreement is reached the artist probably isn't going to hear about any of the decisions, simply because they're a muso, and would rather be doing other shit. And these things usually have to be worked out very quickly (production schedules). This sounds like someone ballsed up, or possibly there er... hmm. It is possible, though certainly only one of a number of possibilities and no-one should be accused of anything, this is pure speculation... it is possible that an omission of the full nature of the conference to be licensed to could have occurred. Because 'political purposes' is probably something I'd slap in there by default as 'artist should be consulted'.
n.b again, just have kind of tangential experience, not a professional opinion, please don't sue me.