Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Liz Truss’s time is up

No he’s not. Baphomet isn’t the devil.

One of the problems with this entity /symbol is that it’s fairly recent, and a kind of invention.
Not the devil although used by Satanists. Who, incidentally, are not devil worshipers.
Well that's me told. :)
 
Well that's me told. :)

You don’t have to take my word for it Frieda. There’s a whole world of internet out there where you can easily check :)


Baphomet was originally a Christian representation of Muhammad. Just sharing knowledge.


That‘s one of the possible sources of the name but Baphomet isn’t a representsrion of Muhammed. And isn’t a Christian symbol.
 
I did like the bit when she said something along the lines of 'I've lived in Leeds and Paisley and have seen what damage government can do."

Naturally, she lived in these places in the 80s, and the government was the Conservatives.
So fucking what!

Well, I've been to Hastings and I've been to Brighton
I've been to Eastbourne too
So what, so what
And I've been here, I've been there
I've been every fucking where
So what, so what
So what, so what, you boring little cunt
Well, who cares, who cares what you do
Yeah, who cares, who cares about you, you, you, you, you

 
You don’t have to take my word for it Frieda. There’s a whole world of internet out there where you can easily check :)





That‘s one of the presumed sources of the name but Baphomet is t a representsrion of Muhammed.
No I do take your word for it mate. I try to stay off that Internet thingy. Its full of loonies who see Benzema in everything. He's the devil yeah?
 
how's about you produce some actual evidence for this
Baphomet - Wikipedia
Raymond of Aguilers, a chronicler of the First Crusade, reports that the troubadours used the term Bafomet for Muhammad, and Bafumaria for a mosque. The name Bafometz later appeared around 1195 in the Occitan poems Senhors, per los nostres peccatz by the troubadour Gavaudan. Around 1250 a poem bewailing the defeat of the Seventh Crusade by Austorc d’Aorlhac again uses Bafomet for Muhammad.

'tis but hearsay evidence, but so is all evidence from so long ago.
 
There’s no such thing as the devil and no such thing as Baphomet. They both exist only as ideas, representations, moral lessons. As such, if the Christians want to decide their devil is Satan is Baphomet, they are no more or less correct about that than they are about any other myth they make up.
 
yeh i saw that. now, since you've taken on this task how about you produce some actual evidence for it being not a term for or mishearing of mohammed but baphomet being a christian representation of mohammed.
There’s no such thing as the devil and no such thing as Baphomet. They both exist only as ideas, representations, moral lessons. As such, if the Christians want to decide their devil is Satan is Baphomet, they are no more or less correct about that than they are about any other myth they make up
Quite. Here are we are getting excited by the usual state propaganda (myths), remembering, as Fred the Great of Prussia remarked (in essence), that religion is an invention of the state.
 
Back
Top Bottom