Karl Masks
Birds Angel Delight
The look of a person haunted by the ghost of Christmas Kwarteng
Truss is clearly not backtracking on her &Kwarteng's ludicrous tax cut mini budget maximum carnage, so am I right in thinking that the mini-budget goes to a vote in the commons?
Tweet: Truss suggests Nicola Sturgeon announce the same tax cuts as she has
It does still have to be voted on before it can go into force.There’s only a vote after an ‘actual’ budget. Which this wasn’t, it was a Special Economic Operation.
I'm going to invest mine in gin as reckon at this rate I'm going to need as much as I can get my hands on.Now is the time to invest your money in deckchairs and popcorn futures.
this is all great developments for Scottish Independence' I want to work with nicola' !
Same lizz truss that said Nicola is best ignored? Fucking hell
Yes, it does rather hole below the waterline any 'fiscal responsibility' line of attack. I presume the only reason the laughter isn't louder at Holyrood is that Scotland is still fully shackled to the shitshow.this is all great developments for Scottish Independence
Mini-Budget & Mini-ResponsibilityThere going to need a whole new department called the Office of Mini-Budget Responsibility.
It's hilarious and absolutely fucking terrifying all at the same time.
Part of me wonders if one of the reasons they won't back down is the thought that we're all getting blown up next week anyway.It's actually quite terrifying. They're clearly hoping to 'ride it out' the next days and weeks and count on much of the media settling down/moving on. But if the government aren't forced to back down, and ideally got rid of, it seems the years ahead are going to be a absolutely brutal round of cuts, including things we thought were pretty safe and 'untouchable'. Unless nuclear conflagration gets us first.
It's actually quite terrifying. They're clearly hoping to 'ride it out' the next days and weeks and count on much of the media settling down/moving on. But if the government aren't forced to back down, and ideally got rid of, it seems the years ahead are going to be a absolutely brutal round of cuts, including things we thought were pretty safe and 'untouchable'. Unless nuclear conflagration gets us first.
I have a theory that Truss's process with this budget was pretty much the same at Putin's for invading Ukraine.
She surrounded herself with a small group of people, liable to tell her anything she wanted hear, excluded any non-barmy advisors, and allowed herself to be convinced that the ridiculous thing she wanted to achieve (massively cut taxes without also cutting spending) could be easily achieved with a single stealthy act of genius.
All she had to do was have KK announce the massive tax cuts and then sit back as the FTSE soared. By the time it came to setting out spending plans, five weeks later, the massive boost in projected growth would mean only modest spending cuts would be needed, or none at all probably.
Then, it didn't work, because it was an obviously stupid plan. And now she's decided she has has to lay waste to an entire country rather than admit fallibility.
Betcha.
It's actually quite terrifying. They're clearly hoping to 'ride it out' the next days and weeks and count on much of the media settling down/moving on. But if the government aren't forced to back down, and ideally got rid of, it seems the years ahead are going to be a absolutely brutal round of cuts, including things we thought were pretty safe and 'untouchable'. Unless nuclear conflagration gets us first.
this is all great developments for Scottish Independence
Yes, it does rather hole below the waterline any 'fiscal responsibility' line of attack. I presume the only reason the laughter isn't louder at Holyrood is that Scotland is still fully shackled to the shitshow.
There’s a point at which spending can’t be cut without it destroying the fabric of society, at which point it also becomes its own input to an economic death spiral. If the population are starving, they can’t buy things. A company would rather pay 30% tax on £100m of profit than 20% tax on £10m of profit. Or, for that matter, no tax at all because it has made a loss.
This isn’t just an angry “something must be done”. It’s an implacable fact that inevitably plays out. Governments usually fear failing to protect the population from ruin because they can’t survive that.
What does this mean in practice, though? Because you can believe in shrinking the state all you want, but reality doesn’t tend to share your belief beyond a certain point. And I think we must be pretty close to that pointEvery single person in Liz cabinet is of the ingrained belief that the state shouldn't exist.
It's almost religious in its devotion to shrinking the state
What does this mean in practice, though? Because you can believe in shrinking the state all you want, but reality doesn’t tend to share your belief beyond a certain point. And I think we must be pretty close to that point
Arab diplomats urge Liz Truss not to move British embassy to Jerusalem
Private letter says ‘illegal” plan could jeopardise free trade deal between UK and Gulf Cooperation Councilwww.theguardian.com
Obviously I’m not up to date on all things truss, but where did this gem of an idea come from ?